Real-time error correction of multiple-hour-ahead flash flood forecasting based on the sliding runoff-rain data and deep learning models

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132918
Xingyu Zhou , Xiaorong Huang , Xue Jiang , Jinming Jiang
{"title":"Real-time error correction of multiple-hour-ahead flash flood forecasting based on the sliding runoff-rain data and deep learning models","authors":"Xingyu Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaorong Huang ,&nbsp;Xue Jiang ,&nbsp;Jinming Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Real-time error correction of flood forecasting is a key method for improving forecast accuracy. However, due to the rapid and unpredictable rise of flash flood discharge and the limited availability of analysis data on short temporal scales, developing robust forecast error correction methods remains a challenge. In this study, we employed a physically-based distributed hydrological model combined with deep learning techniques to develop a real-time error correction method for continuous flash flood forecasting based on sliding runoff-rain data. Taking a typical mountainous river in southwestern China as the study area, we established three input schemes: “sliding runoff data only” (Scheme 1), “hydrological model outputs and sliding runoff data” (Scheme 2), and “hydrological model outputs and sliding runoff-rain data” (Scheme 3). We compared the real-time correction performance of three deep learning models with different architectures—CNN, LSTM, and Transformer—under different input schemes. The results indicate that: 1) LSTM performed the best and most consistently according to the three main evaluation metrics. Although the Transformer showed performance fluctuations, it demonstrated great potential in long forecast correction times, where the correlation between feature inputs and target values is relatively weak. 2) After adding sliding cumulative maximum precipitation data, CNN performance improved significantly, especially in correcting multi-peak floods. 3) The length of the forecast correction time has a significant impact on correction performance. When the forecast correction time approximates the basin’s lag time of runoff concentration, the corrected results have reached a relatively reliable level and entered a more stable phase. This method effectively improves the accuracy of real-time flash flood multiple-hour-ahead forecasting and could provide reliable references for disaster management authorities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"655 ","pages":"Article 132918"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425002562","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Real-time error correction of flood forecasting is a key method for improving forecast accuracy. However, due to the rapid and unpredictable rise of flash flood discharge and the limited availability of analysis data on short temporal scales, developing robust forecast error correction methods remains a challenge. In this study, we employed a physically-based distributed hydrological model combined with deep learning techniques to develop a real-time error correction method for continuous flash flood forecasting based on sliding runoff-rain data. Taking a typical mountainous river in southwestern China as the study area, we established three input schemes: “sliding runoff data only” (Scheme 1), “hydrological model outputs and sliding runoff data” (Scheme 2), and “hydrological model outputs and sliding runoff-rain data” (Scheme 3). We compared the real-time correction performance of three deep learning models with different architectures—CNN, LSTM, and Transformer—under different input schemes. The results indicate that: 1) LSTM performed the best and most consistently according to the three main evaluation metrics. Although the Transformer showed performance fluctuations, it demonstrated great potential in long forecast correction times, where the correlation between feature inputs and target values is relatively weak. 2) After adding sliding cumulative maximum precipitation data, CNN performance improved significantly, especially in correcting multi-peak floods. 3) The length of the forecast correction time has a significant impact on correction performance. When the forecast correction time approximates the basin’s lag time of runoff concentration, the corrected results have reached a relatively reliable level and entered a more stable phase. This method effectively improves the accuracy of real-time flash flood multiple-hour-ahead forecasting and could provide reliable references for disaster management authorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Geomorphological evolution in a medium macrotidal estuary across 88 years: shift from natural to human-influenced states Real-time error correction of multiple-hour-ahead flash flood forecasting based on the sliding runoff-rain data and deep learning models Applicability of three remote sensing based soil moisture variables for mapping soil organic matter in areas with different vegetation densities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1