FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING AMONG HISPANIC MEN: RESULTS FROM HISPANIC COMMUNITY HEALTH STUDY/STUDY OF LATINOS (HCHS/SOL)

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.029
Aysswarya Manoharan, Blanca Noriega Esquives, Frank Penedo, Helen Hougen
{"title":"FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING AMONG HISPANIC MEN: RESULTS FROM HISPANIC COMMUNITY HEALTH STUDY/STUDY OF LATINOS (HCHS/SOL)","authors":"Aysswarya Manoharan,&nbsp;Blanca Noriega Esquives,&nbsp;Frank Penedo,&nbsp;Helen Hougen","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Known disparities exist in prostate cancer (PCa) treatment and outcome among Hispanic men. Hispanic men are significantly more likely to present with more advanced prostate cancer than non-Hispanic whites. Unequal access to early prostate cancer detection may result in higher rates of prostate cancer diagnoses at an advanced stage. Currently, little is known regarding the pattern of prostate cancer screening among Hispanic men. We aimed to determine the prostate cancer screening rate among Hispanic men and identify sociodemographic, cultural, psychosocial, medical, and healthcare access predictors associated with prostate cancer screening.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) is a prospective, population-based multicenter observational study of Hispanic adults recruited from four US metropolitan areas (Bronx, NY; Miami, FL; San Diego, CA; Chicago, IL). We included Hispanic men 40+ years who participated in the study between 2014-2017. Our primary outcome was self-reported receipt of a PSA blood test. We excluded those with a prior prostate cancer diagnosis or a missing value for the outcome variable. All analyses were stratified by age categories (ages 40-54, 55-69, and 70+) and incorporated weights for sampling, stratification, and clustering to account for the HCHS/SOL complex survey design. Associations between participant characteristics and PSA screening rates were examined using t-tests and chi-squared tests. Weighted logistic regression models were used to examine the rates of PSA screening along with odds of having a PSA test given demographic, cultural, psychosocial, medical, and healthcare utilization factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our cohort included 3,484 diverse Hispanic men (Table 1) whose PSA screening rates were analyzed by race/nationality (Figure 1). PSA screening increased with age (40-54 years: 20%, 55-69 years: 46%, and 70+ years: 56%, <em>p</em>&lt;0.001). Black Hispanic men have the lowest odds of screening (OR 0.24 95%CI: 0.07-0.86, <em>p</em>=0.028 for ages 40-54 and OR 0.31 95%CI: 0.11-0.91, <em>p</em>=0.033 for ages 55-69). Cuban men had the lowest odds of screening (OR 0.41 for ages 55-69 and OR 0.32 for ages 70+). For men aged 40-54, lower family cohesion, lower chronic stress, and not having a primary doctor predicted lack of PSA screening. For men aged 55-69, lower BMI, low social support, not having a personal doctor, and remote check-up predicted lack of PSA screening. For men aged 70+, odds of screening decreased with low education attainment and not having a personal doctor.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among Hispanic men, a low rate of guideline-appropriate PSA screening and significant heterogeneity exist. Black Hispanics consistently have the lowest rate of PSA screening in our population. Men of Cuban heritage ages 55-69 had the lowest screening rates. Poor primary health access is also strongly associated with low PSA screening rates. Furthermore, being employed, increased family cohesion, and social support were associated with higher rates of screening. Disparities in PSA screening practices may contribute to downstream effects of more advanced disease presentation in this population.</div><div>This is one of the first studies to assess prevalence and predictors of PSA screening within the Hispanic population. These findings underscore the within-population screening heterogeneity in this diverse community and highlights areas of targeted intervention in community health screenings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"43 3","pages":"Page 11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143924008093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Known disparities exist in prostate cancer (PCa) treatment and outcome among Hispanic men. Hispanic men are significantly more likely to present with more advanced prostate cancer than non-Hispanic whites. Unequal access to early prostate cancer detection may result in higher rates of prostate cancer diagnoses at an advanced stage. Currently, little is known regarding the pattern of prostate cancer screening among Hispanic men. We aimed to determine the prostate cancer screening rate among Hispanic men and identify sociodemographic, cultural, psychosocial, medical, and healthcare access predictors associated with prostate cancer screening.

Methods

The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) is a prospective, population-based multicenter observational study of Hispanic adults recruited from four US metropolitan areas (Bronx, NY; Miami, FL; San Diego, CA; Chicago, IL). We included Hispanic men 40+ years who participated in the study between 2014-2017. Our primary outcome was self-reported receipt of a PSA blood test. We excluded those with a prior prostate cancer diagnosis or a missing value for the outcome variable. All analyses were stratified by age categories (ages 40-54, 55-69, and 70+) and incorporated weights for sampling, stratification, and clustering to account for the HCHS/SOL complex survey design. Associations between participant characteristics and PSA screening rates were examined using t-tests and chi-squared tests. Weighted logistic regression models were used to examine the rates of PSA screening along with odds of having a PSA test given demographic, cultural, psychosocial, medical, and healthcare utilization factors.

Results

Our cohort included 3,484 diverse Hispanic men (Table 1) whose PSA screening rates were analyzed by race/nationality (Figure 1). PSA screening increased with age (40-54 years: 20%, 55-69 years: 46%, and 70+ years: 56%, p<0.001). Black Hispanic men have the lowest odds of screening (OR 0.24 95%CI: 0.07-0.86, p=0.028 for ages 40-54 and OR 0.31 95%CI: 0.11-0.91, p=0.033 for ages 55-69). Cuban men had the lowest odds of screening (OR 0.41 for ages 55-69 and OR 0.32 for ages 70+). For men aged 40-54, lower family cohesion, lower chronic stress, and not having a primary doctor predicted lack of PSA screening. For men aged 55-69, lower BMI, low social support, not having a personal doctor, and remote check-up predicted lack of PSA screening. For men aged 70+, odds of screening decreased with low education attainment and not having a personal doctor.

Conclusions

Among Hispanic men, a low rate of guideline-appropriate PSA screening and significant heterogeneity exist. Black Hispanics consistently have the lowest rate of PSA screening in our population. Men of Cuban heritage ages 55-69 had the lowest screening rates. Poor primary health access is also strongly associated with low PSA screening rates. Furthermore, being employed, increased family cohesion, and social support were associated with higher rates of screening. Disparities in PSA screening practices may contribute to downstream effects of more advanced disease presentation in this population.
This is one of the first studies to assess prevalence and predictors of PSA screening within the Hispanic population. These findings underscore the within-population screening heterogeneity in this diverse community and highlights areas of targeted intervention in community health screenings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙裔男性前列腺癌筛查相关因素:西班牙裔社区健康研究/拉丁裔研究(hchs / sol)的结果
西班牙裔男性前列腺癌(PCa)治疗和预后存在已知差异。西班牙裔男性比非西班牙裔白人更有可能出现晚期前列腺癌。早期前列腺癌检测机会的不平等可能导致前列腺癌晚期诊断率较高。目前,对西班牙裔男性前列腺癌筛查模式知之甚少。我们的目的是确定西班牙裔男性的前列腺癌筛查率,并确定与前列腺癌筛查相关的社会人口学、文化、社会心理、医学和医疗保健获取预测因素。方法西班牙裔社区健康研究/拉丁裔研究(HCHS/SOL)是一项前瞻性、基于人群的多中心观察性研究,从美国四个大都市地区(Bronx, NY;佛罗里达州迈阿密,;圣地亚哥,加州;芝加哥,IL)。我们纳入了2014-2017年间参与研究的40岁以上的西班牙裔男性。我们的主要结果是接受PSA血液测试的自我报告。我们排除了既往有前列腺癌诊断或结果变量缺失值的患者。所有分析均按年龄类别(40-54岁、55-69岁和70岁以上)分层,并纳入抽样、分层和聚类的权重,以解释HCHS/SOL复杂的调查设计。使用t检验和卡方检验检验参与者特征与PSA筛查率之间的关系。使用加权逻辑回归模型来检查PSA筛查率以及在人口统计学、文化、社会心理、医学和医疗保健利用因素下进行PSA检测的几率。结果:我们的队列包括3,484名不同的西班牙裔男性(表1),他们的PSA筛查率按种族/国籍进行了分析(图1)。PSA筛查随着年龄的增长而增加(40-54岁:20%,55-69岁:46%,70岁以上:56%,p<0.001)。西班牙裔黑人男性的筛查几率最低(40-54岁OR 0.24 95%CI: 0.07-0.86, p=0.028; 55-69岁OR 0.31 95%CI: 0.11-0.91, p=0.033)。古巴男性的筛查几率最低(55-69岁的OR为0.41,70岁以上的OR为0.32)。对于40-54岁的男性,较低的家庭凝聚力,较低的慢性压力,没有主治医生预测缺乏PSA筛查。对于55-69岁的男性,较低的身体质量指数、较低的社会支持、没有私人医生和远程检查预示着缺乏PSA筛查。对于70岁以上的男性,受教育程度低和没有私人医生的男性,接受筛查的几率会降低。结论:在西班牙裔男性中,适合指南的PSA筛查率较低,且存在显著的异质性。在我们的人群中,拉美裔黑人的PSA筛查率一直最低。55-69岁的古巴裔男性筛查率最低。初级卫生服务可及性差也与PSA筛查率低密切相关。此外,就业、家庭凝聚力增强和社会支持与更高的筛查率有关。PSA筛查实践的差异可能会导致该人群中更晚期疾病表现的下游影响。这是评估西班牙裔人群中PSA筛查的患病率和预测因素的首批研究之一。这些发现强调了在这个多样化的社区中人群内筛查的异质性,并强调了在社区健康筛查中有针对性干预的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Spatial immunophenotyping of tumor-associated macrophages predicts prognostic outcomes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma Combined and individual effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node dissection on survival in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy Is More Better? Evaluating Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Cycles Before Surgery for High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Real-world treatment sequences and overall survival in metastatic bladder cancer: The STATES-Bladder study Real-world functional and oncologic outcomes of prostate gland ablation vs. standard of care therapies for localized prostate: A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1