A comprehensive review of integrating behavioral drivers of technology adoption and energy service use in energy system models

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115520
H.S. Galster , A.J. Van der Wal , A.E. Batenburg , V. Koning , A.P.C. Faaij
{"title":"A comprehensive review of integrating behavioral drivers of technology adoption and energy service use in energy system models","authors":"H.S. Galster ,&nbsp;A.J. Van der Wal ,&nbsp;A.E. Batenburg ,&nbsp;V. Koning ,&nbsp;A.P.C. Faaij","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy System Models (ESMs) that aim at describing and exploring pathways towards a decarbonized future energy system currently account insufficiently for the behavior of households and individuals. To address this shortcoming, this study evaluates models' existing approaches to incorporate behavior considering social science insights to advance the models' behavioral realism. A structured literature review and expert interviews were employed, selecting sixteen ESMs and two sectoral energy models for further investigation. Main data sources for the analysis were model descriptions and interview notes. The results show a predominant focus of models on financial aspects of adoption decisions and energy service use, while there is less consideration of non-economic behavioral drivers. Models also often rely on a weak empirical foundation for behavioral drivers. Based on these findings, advancing the representation of behavior in ESMs is needed to strengthen the realism of models’ explorative and descriptive insights. This analysis outlines concrete strategies to guide such an endeavor. It is recommended to consider relevant drivers of energy-related behavior, to employ a data-driven approach which relates behavioral outcomes to these drivers, and to define actor heterogeneity according to meaningful behavioral differences. In comparison to optimization approaches, the flexibility of simulation modelling provides a wider range of options for incorporating and analyzing behavioral aspects in ESMs. Future interdisciplinary research should further align social science insights with energy system modelling, building on the suggested strategies, to improve the accuracy of model predictions and to facilitate the consideration of behavioral aspects in the energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 115520"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001935","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy System Models (ESMs) that aim at describing and exploring pathways towards a decarbonized future energy system currently account insufficiently for the behavior of households and individuals. To address this shortcoming, this study evaluates models' existing approaches to incorporate behavior considering social science insights to advance the models' behavioral realism. A structured literature review and expert interviews were employed, selecting sixteen ESMs and two sectoral energy models for further investigation. Main data sources for the analysis were model descriptions and interview notes. The results show a predominant focus of models on financial aspects of adoption decisions and energy service use, while there is less consideration of non-economic behavioral drivers. Models also often rely on a weak empirical foundation for behavioral drivers. Based on these findings, advancing the representation of behavior in ESMs is needed to strengthen the realism of models’ explorative and descriptive insights. This analysis outlines concrete strategies to guide such an endeavor. It is recommended to consider relevant drivers of energy-related behavior, to employ a data-driven approach which relates behavioral outcomes to these drivers, and to define actor heterogeneity according to meaningful behavioral differences. In comparison to optimization approaches, the flexibility of simulation modelling provides a wider range of options for incorporating and analyzing behavioral aspects in ESMs. Future interdisciplinary research should further align social science insights with energy system modelling, building on the suggested strategies, to improve the accuracy of model predictions and to facilitate the consideration of behavioral aspects in the energy transition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Informal economies and energy efficiency: Empirical evidence from African countries Impact of hydrogen on cement slurry: A review Product quality research in the industrialized preparation of electronic grade polysilicon: A review of impurity sources and control strategies An experimental study for improving performance of a cylindrical OWC WEC with a heave plate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1