A comprehensive review of integrating behavioral drivers of technology adoption and energy service use in energy system models

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115520
H.S. Galster , A.J. Van der Wal , A.E. Batenburg , V. Koning , A.P.C. Faaij
{"title":"A comprehensive review of integrating behavioral drivers of technology adoption and energy service use in energy system models","authors":"H.S. Galster ,&nbsp;A.J. Van der Wal ,&nbsp;A.E. Batenburg ,&nbsp;V. Koning ,&nbsp;A.P.C. Faaij","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy System Models (ESMs) that aim at describing and exploring pathways towards a decarbonized future energy system currently account insufficiently for the behavior of households and individuals. To address this shortcoming, this study evaluates models' existing approaches to incorporate behavior considering social science insights to advance the models' behavioral realism. A structured literature review and expert interviews were employed, selecting sixteen ESMs and two sectoral energy models for further investigation. Main data sources for the analysis were model descriptions and interview notes. The results show a predominant focus of models on financial aspects of adoption decisions and energy service use, while there is less consideration of non-economic behavioral drivers. Models also often rely on a weak empirical foundation for behavioral drivers. Based on these findings, advancing the representation of behavior in ESMs is needed to strengthen the realism of models’ explorative and descriptive insights. This analysis outlines concrete strategies to guide such an endeavor. It is recommended to consider relevant drivers of energy-related behavior, to employ a data-driven approach which relates behavioral outcomes to these drivers, and to define actor heterogeneity according to meaningful behavioral differences. In comparison to optimization approaches, the flexibility of simulation modelling provides a wider range of options for incorporating and analyzing behavioral aspects in ESMs. Future interdisciplinary research should further align social science insights with energy system modelling, building on the suggested strategies, to improve the accuracy of model predictions and to facilitate the consideration of behavioral aspects in the energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 115520"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001935","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy System Models (ESMs) that aim at describing and exploring pathways towards a decarbonized future energy system currently account insufficiently for the behavior of households and individuals. To address this shortcoming, this study evaluates models' existing approaches to incorporate behavior considering social science insights to advance the models' behavioral realism. A structured literature review and expert interviews were employed, selecting sixteen ESMs and two sectoral energy models for further investigation. Main data sources for the analysis were model descriptions and interview notes. The results show a predominant focus of models on financial aspects of adoption decisions and energy service use, while there is less consideration of non-economic behavioral drivers. Models also often rely on a weak empirical foundation for behavioral drivers. Based on these findings, advancing the representation of behavior in ESMs is needed to strengthen the realism of models’ explorative and descriptive insights. This analysis outlines concrete strategies to guide such an endeavor. It is recommended to consider relevant drivers of energy-related behavior, to employ a data-driven approach which relates behavioral outcomes to these drivers, and to define actor heterogeneity according to meaningful behavioral differences. In comparison to optimization approaches, the flexibility of simulation modelling provides a wider range of options for incorporating and analyzing behavioral aspects in ESMs. Future interdisciplinary research should further align social science insights with energy system modelling, building on the suggested strategies, to improve the accuracy of model predictions and to facilitate the consideration of behavioral aspects in the energy transition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合能源系统模型中技术采用和能源服务使用的行为驱动因素的综述
能源系统模型(ESMs)旨在描述和探索通往脱碳未来能源系统的途径,目前不足以解释家庭和个人的行为。为了解决这一缺陷,本研究评估了模型的现有方法,以考虑社会科学见解纳入行为,以提高模型的行为现实性。采用结构化文献综述和专家访谈,选择16个esm和两个部门能源模型进行进一步调查。分析的主要数据来源是模型描述和访谈笔记。结果表明,模型主要关注采用决策和能源服务使用的财务方面,而对非经济行为驱动因素的考虑较少。对于行为驱动因素,模型往往依赖于薄弱的经验基础。基于这些发现,需要推进esm中的行为表征,以加强模型探索性和描述性见解的现实性。本分析概述了指导这一努力的具体战略。建议考虑能源相关行为的相关驱动因素,采用数据驱动的方法,将行为结果与这些驱动因素联系起来,并根据有意义的行为差异定义行为者异质性。与优化方法相比,仿真建模的灵活性为esm中行为方面的整合和分析提供了更广泛的选择。未来的跨学科研究应进一步将社会科学见解与能源系统建模结合起来,以建议的策略为基础,提高模型预测的准确性,并促进对能源转型行为方面的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Collective decision-making in energy transitions: A systematic review and a way forward Advancements in superstructures design and solver approaches for heat and mass exchange network synthesis Recent advances for thermal management of electronic devices: A state-of-the-art review A state-of-the-art review on decarbonizing aerospace manufacturing with life cycle sustainability assessment Power-to-protein: Convergent carbon capture, renewable energy, and microbial biomanufacturing for sustainable food security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1