Can we really use design-free hydroacoustic data from fishing vessels for assessing abundance and distribution of marine species? A proof of concept analysis on Antarctic krill

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113284
J.A. Canseco , E.J. Niklitschek , G. Skaret
{"title":"Can we really use design-free hydroacoustic data from fishing vessels for assessing abundance and distribution of marine species? A proof of concept analysis on Antarctic krill","authors":"J.A. Canseco ,&nbsp;E.J. Niklitschek ,&nbsp;G. Skaret","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Euphausia superba</em> is a well-known Antarctic crustacean of great economic and ecological importance, whose management requires accurate and precise abundance and distribution estimates. Such estimates are difficult to achieve given the remoteness, extension, and large spatio-temporal variability of its geographic distribution. Acoustic data collected on board krill fishing vessels during normal fishing operation has a great potential to enhance such abundance and distribution estimates. In the present work we test the hypothesis that design-free hydroacoustic data collected during regular fishing operations can be used to produce abundance and distribution estimates with similar accuracy and precision than design-based scientific surveys. Thus, we produced and compared distribution and abundance estimates produced using either design-free hydroacoustic data collected during regular fishing operations or design-based data from scientific surveys conducted off the South Orkney Islands during summer 2017 and 2019. Following a Bayesian geostatistical approach that considered and fitted simultaneously the spatial and temporal correlation of the data, we tested different auto-correlation structures and selected the most informative models. The comparison included the means and coefficients of variation (CV) of the probability of presence (p), conditional density (d) and relative abundance index (RAI) estimates. In addition, we also simulated scenarios of parallel and orthogonal transects and obtained RAI estimates from each scenario to compare with design-based and design-free estimates for each year. In 2017, the mean RAI estimated using design-free data (94 421 m<sup>2</sup>; CV: 14 %) was ∼ 50 % higher than the one estimated with design-based data (60 232 m<sup>2</sup>; CV: 42 %), both within the fishing area. In 2019, the mean RAI estimated using design-free data (509 413 m<sup>2</sup> CV: 6 %) was ∼ 5-fold higher than the one obtained using design-based data (113 654 m<sup>2</sup>; CV: 33 %) in the same area. Design-free RAI estimates were highly sensitive to extrapolating the inference area from fishing to the high-density sub-area. On the other hand, changing from an hourly-resolved spatio-temporal model to a purely spatial model resulted in neglectable changes. Despite observed differences in mean estimates, both methods identified similar areas of high presence and density of Antarctic krill north and north-west of the South Orkney Islands. The 2017 estimate from design-free data was probably affected by a larger dispersion of krill, and a less observed effective area during regular fishing operations. Our results show that despite using state-of-the-art methods for processing and analyzing design-free, acoustic data collected by the fishing fleet, it still yielded unreliable RAI estimates. The bias and uncertainty related to design-free data were reduced when parallel or orthogonal transects were applied although orthogonal transects yielded results with increased accuracy as they were only 21 % lower and 0.02 % higher than the true value in 2017 and 2019, respectively. Other possible approach to minimize bias would be integrating hydroacoustic information from multiple vessels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 113284"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25002158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Euphausia superba is a well-known Antarctic crustacean of great economic and ecological importance, whose management requires accurate and precise abundance and distribution estimates. Such estimates are difficult to achieve given the remoteness, extension, and large spatio-temporal variability of its geographic distribution. Acoustic data collected on board krill fishing vessels during normal fishing operation has a great potential to enhance such abundance and distribution estimates. In the present work we test the hypothesis that design-free hydroacoustic data collected during regular fishing operations can be used to produce abundance and distribution estimates with similar accuracy and precision than design-based scientific surveys. Thus, we produced and compared distribution and abundance estimates produced using either design-free hydroacoustic data collected during regular fishing operations or design-based data from scientific surveys conducted off the South Orkney Islands during summer 2017 and 2019. Following a Bayesian geostatistical approach that considered and fitted simultaneously the spatial and temporal correlation of the data, we tested different auto-correlation structures and selected the most informative models. The comparison included the means and coefficients of variation (CV) of the probability of presence (p), conditional density (d) and relative abundance index (RAI) estimates. In addition, we also simulated scenarios of parallel and orthogonal transects and obtained RAI estimates from each scenario to compare with design-based and design-free estimates for each year. In 2017, the mean RAI estimated using design-free data (94 421 m2; CV: 14 %) was ∼ 50 % higher than the one estimated with design-based data (60 232 m2; CV: 42 %), both within the fishing area. In 2019, the mean RAI estimated using design-free data (509 413 m2 CV: 6 %) was ∼ 5-fold higher than the one obtained using design-based data (113 654 m2; CV: 33 %) in the same area. Design-free RAI estimates were highly sensitive to extrapolating the inference area from fishing to the high-density sub-area. On the other hand, changing from an hourly-resolved spatio-temporal model to a purely spatial model resulted in neglectable changes. Despite observed differences in mean estimates, both methods identified similar areas of high presence and density of Antarctic krill north and north-west of the South Orkney Islands. The 2017 estimate from design-free data was probably affected by a larger dispersion of krill, and a less observed effective area during regular fishing operations. Our results show that despite using state-of-the-art methods for processing and analyzing design-free, acoustic data collected by the fishing fleet, it still yielded unreliable RAI estimates. The bias and uncertainty related to design-free data were reduced when parallel or orthogonal transects were applied although orthogonal transects yielded results with increased accuracy as they were only 21 % lower and 0.02 % higher than the true value in 2017 and 2019, respectively. Other possible approach to minimize bias would be integrating hydroacoustic information from multiple vessels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
Integrating multi-model frameworks to unravel the spatiotemporal dynamics of flash floods in the Tianshan Mountain, China Intelligent identification of flood risks and resilience planning in piedmont areas with nature-based solutions Can we really use design-free hydroacoustic data from fishing vessels for assessing abundance and distribution of marine species? A proof of concept analysis on Antarctic krill eDNA-based approaches advance ecotoxicology: Insights and best practices from eDNA metabarcoding studies in evaluating stress-induced aquatic (macro-) invertebrate community composition Research on restorative perception mechanisms in rural landscapes based on structural equation modelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1