Exploring the spatial effect of China's carbon emission trading scheme on green total factor productivity: An SBM-MML measurement and its decomposition

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2025.135269
Zhengzhong Wang , Shuihan Liu , Yunjie Wei , Shouyang Wang
{"title":"Exploring the spatial effect of China's carbon emission trading scheme on green total factor productivity: An SBM-MML measurement and its decomposition","authors":"Zhengzhong Wang ,&nbsp;Shuihan Liu ,&nbsp;Yunjie Wei ,&nbsp;Shouyang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.135269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To obtain a detailed evaluation of green total factor productivity (GTFP), a novel measurement, Slack Based Measure-Meta-frontier Malmquist Luenberger (SBM-MML) model, is proposed in this paper. Instead of decomposing the growth rate of GTFP, it can directly decompose the GTFP into three components representing technical efficiency, technological innovation and technical leadership, respectively. Taking the provincial data of China from 2005 to 2020, it is found that eastern China, followed by central China, northeast China and western China, has the highest level of GTFP, efficiency, technological innovation and technical leadership. Moreover, the technological level of eastern China is far ahead of the national average level. In 2013, to explore the mechanism of carbon emission reduction, the Chinese government launched a carbon emissions trading scheme (CETS) in seven pilot regions. In this paper, the spatial difference-in-differences (SDID) model is used to measure the direct effect and the spatial effect of the CETS pilot policy on the GTFP and its components. It is found that the CETS pilot policy has a positive effect and a positive spillover effect on the GTFP, whereas a negative siphon effect on technological innovation is also indicated. Finally, based on the results, several policy implications are put forward.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 135269"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225009119","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To obtain a detailed evaluation of green total factor productivity (GTFP), a novel measurement, Slack Based Measure-Meta-frontier Malmquist Luenberger (SBM-MML) model, is proposed in this paper. Instead of decomposing the growth rate of GTFP, it can directly decompose the GTFP into three components representing technical efficiency, technological innovation and technical leadership, respectively. Taking the provincial data of China from 2005 to 2020, it is found that eastern China, followed by central China, northeast China and western China, has the highest level of GTFP, efficiency, technological innovation and technical leadership. Moreover, the technological level of eastern China is far ahead of the national average level. In 2013, to explore the mechanism of carbon emission reduction, the Chinese government launched a carbon emissions trading scheme (CETS) in seven pilot regions. In this paper, the spatial difference-in-differences (SDID) model is used to measure the direct effect and the spatial effect of the CETS pilot policy on the GTFP and its components. It is found that the CETS pilot policy has a positive effect and a positive spillover effect on the GTFP, whereas a negative siphon effect on technological innovation is also indicated. Finally, based on the results, several policy implications are put forward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
期刊最新文献
Permeating hydrogen effect on the protective performance of a composite film consisting of corrosion inhibitors and iron oxides used in CO2 utilization related environment Numerical investigation of thermal energy storage in wavy enclosures with nanoencapsulated phase change materials using deep learning Adaptive distribution topology learning on distributed source energisation and islanding The low-carbon transition of rotary engines: Potential and challenges of alcohol fuels A techno-enviro-economic framework for optimal operation of a battery-driven hybrid energy system with biomass: A risk-averse approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1