Exploring the spatial effect of China's carbon emission trading scheme on green total factor productivity: An SBM-MML measurement and its decomposition

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2025.135269
Zhengzhong Wang , Shuihan Liu , Yunjie Wei , Shouyang Wang
{"title":"Exploring the spatial effect of China's carbon emission trading scheme on green total factor productivity: An SBM-MML measurement and its decomposition","authors":"Zhengzhong Wang ,&nbsp;Shuihan Liu ,&nbsp;Yunjie Wei ,&nbsp;Shouyang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.135269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To obtain a detailed evaluation of green total factor productivity (GTFP), a novel measurement, Slack Based Measure-Meta-frontier Malmquist Luenberger (SBM-MML) model, is proposed in this paper. Instead of decomposing the growth rate of GTFP, it can directly decompose the GTFP into three components representing technical efficiency, technological innovation and technical leadership, respectively. Taking the provincial data of China from 2005 to 2020, it is found that eastern China, followed by central China, northeast China and western China, has the highest level of GTFP, efficiency, technological innovation and technical leadership. Moreover, the technological level of eastern China is far ahead of the national average level. In 2013, to explore the mechanism of carbon emission reduction, the Chinese government launched a carbon emissions trading scheme (CETS) in seven pilot regions. In this paper, the spatial difference-in-differences (SDID) model is used to measure the direct effect and the spatial effect of the CETS pilot policy on the GTFP and its components. It is found that the CETS pilot policy has a positive effect and a positive spillover effect on the GTFP, whereas a negative siphon effect on technological innovation is also indicated. Finally, based on the results, several policy implications are put forward.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 135269"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225009119","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To obtain a detailed evaluation of green total factor productivity (GTFP), a novel measurement, Slack Based Measure-Meta-frontier Malmquist Luenberger (SBM-MML) model, is proposed in this paper. Instead of decomposing the growth rate of GTFP, it can directly decompose the GTFP into three components representing technical efficiency, technological innovation and technical leadership, respectively. Taking the provincial data of China from 2005 to 2020, it is found that eastern China, followed by central China, northeast China and western China, has the highest level of GTFP, efficiency, technological innovation and technical leadership. Moreover, the technological level of eastern China is far ahead of the national average level. In 2013, to explore the mechanism of carbon emission reduction, the Chinese government launched a carbon emissions trading scheme (CETS) in seven pilot regions. In this paper, the spatial difference-in-differences (SDID) model is used to measure the direct effect and the spatial effect of the CETS pilot policy on the GTFP and its components. It is found that the CETS pilot policy has a positive effect and a positive spillover effect on the GTFP, whereas a negative siphon effect on technological innovation is also indicated. Finally, based on the results, several policy implications are put forward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国碳排放交易机制对绿色全要素生产率的空间效应研究——基于SBM-MML的测度及其分解
为了对绿色全要素生产率(GTFP)进行详细的评价,本文提出了一种新的测量方法——基于Slack的测度-元前沿Malmquist - Luenberger (SBM-MML)模型。不分解GTFP的增长率,直接将GTFP分解为分别代表技术效率、技术创新和技术领先的三个组成部分。利用2005 - 2020年中国省际数据,发现中国东部地区的GTFP、效率、技术创新和技术领先水平最高,其次是中部、东北和西部地区。此外,中国东部地区的技术水平远高于全国平均水平。2013年,为探索碳减排机制,中国政府在7个试点地区启动了碳排放权交易机制。本文采用空间差中差(SDID)模型来测度cet试点政策对GTFP及其构成要素的直接效应和空间效应。研究发现,cts试点政策对GTFP具有正效应和正溢出效应,对技术创新具有负虹吸效应。最后,根据研究结果提出了几点政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
期刊最新文献
Super-long gravity heat pipe system for simultaneous heating and cooling in geothermal sites with non-linear temperature gradients Multi-scale weighted fusion network for hyperspectral and LiDAR data to identify stressed vegetation caused by natural gas storage microleakages Path-dependent energy transition optimization in district heating networks: A comparative study between Turku, Finland, and Gothenburg, Sweden Anomaly detection of rotating machinery in small modular reactors with accelerated life data augmentation Performance investigation of SrCl2/Al2O3 composite for thermal energy storage: Numerical modelling and experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1