Winter wheat straw and grain production in response to trinexapac-ethyl and nitrogen fertilizer

IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1002/cft2.70029
Larissa Correia, Ronald Hoover, Daniela R. Carrijo
{"title":"Winter wheat straw and grain production in response to trinexapac-ethyl and nitrogen fertilizer","authors":"Larissa Correia,&nbsp;Ronald Hoover,&nbsp;Daniela R. Carrijo","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managing winter wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) for both grain and straw production is a common practice, especially where cropping and animal systems are integrated, with wheat straw being used for animal bedding. Trinexapac-ethyl (TE) is a common plant growth regulator used in winter wheat and has been studied for its potential to mitigate lodging risk and improve grain yield but its influence on straw yield and quality still needs to be elucidated. Here, we evaluated the effect of TE (control, single, and split application) in combination with three spring nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates for a total of nine treatments over two growing seasons in Pennsylvania. Compared to the control, the application of TE reduced plant height without increasing basal internode diameter, which led to an 8% decrease in straw yield when TE was split applied and a 5% decrease (although not significant at <i>p </i>= 0.05) in straw yield when TE was applied in a single dose. TE did not affect straw water holding capacity, thus preserving its value for animal bedding. No lodging was observed across both growing seasons, and grain yield was not affected by treatments, similar to other studies where TE did not provide a grain yield benefit in the absence of lodging. Grain protein concentration increased with increasing N fertilizer rates, which were achieved through late spring N applications. When considering the use of TE, winter wheat producers must weigh the potential tradeoff between grain and straw yield, although grain and straw quality are maintained.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.70029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for both grain and straw production is a common practice, especially where cropping and animal systems are integrated, with wheat straw being used for animal bedding. Trinexapac-ethyl (TE) is a common plant growth regulator used in winter wheat and has been studied for its potential to mitigate lodging risk and improve grain yield but its influence on straw yield and quality still needs to be elucidated. Here, we evaluated the effect of TE (control, single, and split application) in combination with three spring nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates for a total of nine treatments over two growing seasons in Pennsylvania. Compared to the control, the application of TE reduced plant height without increasing basal internode diameter, which led to an 8% decrease in straw yield when TE was split applied and a 5% decrease (although not significant at = 0.05) in straw yield when TE was applied in a single dose. TE did not affect straw water holding capacity, thus preserving its value for animal bedding. No lodging was observed across both growing seasons, and grain yield was not affected by treatments, similar to other studies where TE did not provide a grain yield benefit in the absence of lodging. Grain protein concentration increased with increasing N fertilizer rates, which were achieved through late spring N applications. When considering the use of TE, winter wheat producers must weigh the potential tradeoff between grain and straw yield, although grain and straw quality are maintained.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management is a peer-reviewed, international, electronic journal covering all aspects of applied crop, forage and grazinglands, and turfgrass management. The journal serves the professions related to the management of crops, forages and grazinglands, and turfgrass by publishing research, briefs, reviews, perspectives, and diagnostic and management guides that are beneficial to researchers, practitioners, educators, and industry representatives.
期刊最新文献
Tar spot impacts silage corn yield and forage nutritive value Low soybean plant population: Is replanting necessary? Soybean overcome differences in row spacing and seeding rate to maintain stable yield Winter wheat straw and grain production in response to trinexapac-ethyl and nitrogen fertilizer Optimizing late winter plantings of cool-season annual forages in the southern United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1