Health literacy interventions and health literacy-related outcomes for older adults: a systematic review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12457-7
Neil Marshall, Michelle Butler, Veronica Lambert, Claire M Timon, David Joyce, Austin Warters
{"title":"Health literacy interventions and health literacy-related outcomes for older adults: a systematic review.","authors":"Neil Marshall, Michelle Butler, Veronica Lambert, Claire M Timon, David Joyce, Austin Warters","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12457-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults, identified as 65 years and over, a population for which low health literacy is prevalent, represented most people attending primary health care services provided by the Health Service Executive (HSE) in Ireland in 2019. Any limitation in a person's health literacy, specifically their ability to access, understand and use health information, can affect their ability to make healthcare related decisions. Information on the evidence for health literacy interventions is also required by healthcare providers and policy makers to inform decision-making and service development to improve outcomes for older people. This review aimed to synthesise the evidence on health literacy interventions and health literacy-related outcomes for older adults. The specific objectives were to (1) identify what health literacy interventions exist in relation to older adults' ability to access, understand, and use health information, (2) determine the health literacy-related outcomes of these interventions, and (3) identify any trends or patterns which may exist between intervention type and outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted by following PRISMA guidelines. The electronic databases PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched for relevant studies concerning health literacy interventions for older persons. Study data were subsequently analysed using a narrative thematic approach in the context of the three key health literacy characteristics; the ability to access, understand and use health information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. The findings show a potential link between individual-focussed health literacy interventions and positive health literacy-related outcomes in relation to older persons' ability to understand and use health information. The review also found that use of health literacy level assessment tools varied with studies either using different tools for the same older adult cohort, or failing to assess pre-intervention health literacy levels altogether.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The potential trend found between individual-focused interventions and positive health literacy outcomes suggests that implementing health literacy-related interventions directly to the individual is key. Furthermore, our study found an inconsistency amongst the included studies in relation to the implementation of health literacy assessment tools, with different tools used across most studies, and some studies choosing not to utilise any assessment tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"319"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12457-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older adults, identified as 65 years and over, a population for which low health literacy is prevalent, represented most people attending primary health care services provided by the Health Service Executive (HSE) in Ireland in 2019. Any limitation in a person's health literacy, specifically their ability to access, understand and use health information, can affect their ability to make healthcare related decisions. Information on the evidence for health literacy interventions is also required by healthcare providers and policy makers to inform decision-making and service development to improve outcomes for older people. This review aimed to synthesise the evidence on health literacy interventions and health literacy-related outcomes for older adults. The specific objectives were to (1) identify what health literacy interventions exist in relation to older adults' ability to access, understand, and use health information, (2) determine the health literacy-related outcomes of these interventions, and (3) identify any trends or patterns which may exist between intervention type and outcome.

Methods: This review was conducted by following PRISMA guidelines. The electronic databases PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched for relevant studies concerning health literacy interventions for older persons. Study data were subsequently analysed using a narrative thematic approach in the context of the three key health literacy characteristics; the ability to access, understand and use health information.

Results: Thirty-four studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. The findings show a potential link between individual-focussed health literacy interventions and positive health literacy-related outcomes in relation to older persons' ability to understand and use health information. The review also found that use of health literacy level assessment tools varied with studies either using different tools for the same older adult cohort, or failing to assess pre-intervention health literacy levels altogether.

Conclusions: The potential trend found between individual-focused interventions and positive health literacy outcomes suggests that implementing health literacy-related interventions directly to the individual is key. Furthermore, our study found an inconsistency amongst the included studies in relation to the implementation of health literacy assessment tools, with different tools used across most studies, and some studies choosing not to utilise any assessment tool.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人健康素养干预措施和健康素养相关结果:系统综述
背景:2019年,65岁及以上的老年人(健康素养普遍较低)代表了爱尔兰卫生服务管理局(HSE)提供的初级卫生保健服务的大多数人。个人卫生知识的任何限制,特别是他们获取、理解和使用卫生信息的能力的限制,都可能影响他们做出卫生保健相关决定的能力。卫生保健提供者和决策者还需要有关卫生扫盲干预措施证据的信息,以便为决策和服务开发提供信息,以改善老年人的结果。本综述旨在综合有关老年人健康素养干预措施和健康素养相关结果的证据。具体目标是:(1)确定存在哪些健康素养干预措施与老年人获取、理解和使用健康信息的能力有关,(2)确定这些干预措施与健康素养相关的结果,以及(3)确定干预类型与结果之间可能存在的任何趋势或模式。方法:本综述遵循PRISMA指南进行。在PubMed、Embase和Scopus电子数据库中搜索有关老年人健康素养干预措施的相关研究。随后,在三个关键卫生素养特征的背景下,使用叙事主题方法分析了研究数据;访问、理解和使用健康信息的能力。结果:34项研究符合纳入标准。研究结果表明,在老年人理解和使用健康信息的能力方面,以个人为重点的健康素养干预措施与积极的健康素养相关结果之间存在潜在联系。该综述还发现,健康素养水平评估工具的使用因研究的不同而异,这些研究要么对同一老年队列使用不同的工具,要么完全没有评估干预前的健康素养水平。结论:以个人为中心的干预措施与积极的健康素养结果之间的潜在趋势表明,直接对个人实施与健康素养相关的干预措施是关键。此外,我们的研究发现纳入的研究在实施健康素养评估工具方面存在不一致,大多数研究使用了不同的工具,有些研究选择不使用任何评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Impact of day-surgery on cancer treatment costs: a city-level case study in Ningxia, China. Organisational learning and the evolution of ischaemic stroke care in a resource-constrained public hospital: a seven-year case study. Determinants of sustainable quality improvement for operating room clean air systems: a two-phase sequential qualitative study in Dutch hospitals. Do publicly funded health insurance schemes reduce out-of-pocket expenditure?: Evidence from India. Psychosocial supports for staff in maternity hospitals and units following adverse events: a mapping study in the Republic of Ireland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1