Weighted Blankets for Agitation in Hospitalized Patients with Dementia: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Research Protocols Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.2196/57264
Holly A Schenzel, Allyson K Palmer, Neel B Shah, Donna K Lawson, Karen M Fischer, Maria I Lapid, Ruth E DeFoster
{"title":"Weighted Blankets for Agitation in Hospitalized Patients with Dementia: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Holly A Schenzel, Allyson K Palmer, Neel B Shah, Donna K Lawson, Karen M Fischer, Maria I Lapid, Ruth E DeFoster","doi":"10.2196/57264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited therapies approved for the treatment of aggression and agitation in patients with dementia. While antipsychotics and benzodiazepines are commonly used, these medications have been associated with significant side effects and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) boxed warnings. Weighted blankets have been associated with decreased anxiety and improved sleep. Weighted blankets are potentially a nonpharmacologic option to reduce agitation in hospitalized patients with dementia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of weighted blankets on aggression and agitation in hospitalized patients with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot study will be conducted on a total of 30 hospitalized patients with a documented clinical diagnosis of dementia and ongoing agitated behaviors admitted to a medicine or psychiatry service. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either a weighted blanket for 3 nights or continued usual care. The primary outcome is the change in the observational version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI-O) over the course of the 3-night study period. The secondary outcomes are changes in Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised (ESAS-r) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores, hours of sleep, use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, and incidence of delirium. Identical study assessments will be completed for both the usual care and the weighted blanket study groups. At 5 study time points (baseline, postnight 1, postnight 2, postnight 3, and a final assessment 48-72 h after the last use of the weighted blanket), patients will be assessed with the CMAI-O, ESAS-r, and CGI tools. All assessments will be completed by the bedside nurse or patient care assistant caring for the patient each day. Within 2 to 4 weeks post discharge from the hospital, study coordinators will contact the patient's legally authorized representative (LAR) to assess for continued use of the weighted blanket.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enrollment of participants began on April 23, 2023. As of November 2024, a total of 24 participants have been enrolled in the study. Baseline characteristics of enrolled participants will be analyzed and reported upon completion of enrollment. We anticipate completing data collection by March 2026.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study will determine the effect of weighted blankets on agitation in hospitalized patients with dementia. Insights into the effect of weighted blankets on sleep will also be gained. The results of this study will be relevant in the setting of increasing numbers of older adults with dementia exhibiting agitation, leading to increased hospitalizations, caregiver burden, and health care costs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03643991; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03643991.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/57264.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e57264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are limited therapies approved for the treatment of aggression and agitation in patients with dementia. While antipsychotics and benzodiazepines are commonly used, these medications have been associated with significant side effects and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) boxed warnings. Weighted blankets have been associated with decreased anxiety and improved sleep. Weighted blankets are potentially a nonpharmacologic option to reduce agitation in hospitalized patients with dementia.

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of weighted blankets on aggression and agitation in hospitalized patients with dementia.

Methods: A pilot study will be conducted on a total of 30 hospitalized patients with a documented clinical diagnosis of dementia and ongoing agitated behaviors admitted to a medicine or psychiatry service. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either a weighted blanket for 3 nights or continued usual care. The primary outcome is the change in the observational version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI-O) over the course of the 3-night study period. The secondary outcomes are changes in Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised (ESAS-r) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores, hours of sleep, use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, and incidence of delirium. Identical study assessments will be completed for both the usual care and the weighted blanket study groups. At 5 study time points (baseline, postnight 1, postnight 2, postnight 3, and a final assessment 48-72 h after the last use of the weighted blanket), patients will be assessed with the CMAI-O, ESAS-r, and CGI tools. All assessments will be completed by the bedside nurse or patient care assistant caring for the patient each day. Within 2 to 4 weeks post discharge from the hospital, study coordinators will contact the patient's legally authorized representative (LAR) to assess for continued use of the weighted blanket.

Results: Enrollment of participants began on April 23, 2023. As of November 2024, a total of 24 participants have been enrolled in the study. Baseline characteristics of enrolled participants will be analyzed and reported upon completion of enrollment. We anticipate completing data collection by March 2026.

Conclusions: The study will determine the effect of weighted blankets on agitation in hospitalized patients with dementia. Insights into the effect of weighted blankets on sleep will also be gained. The results of this study will be relevant in the setting of increasing numbers of older adults with dementia exhibiting agitation, leading to increased hospitalizations, caregiver burden, and health care costs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03643991; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03643991.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/57264.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加重毛毯治疗住院痴呆患者躁动:一项随机对照试验方案
背景:有有限的治疗方法被批准用于治疗痴呆患者的攻击和躁动。虽然抗精神病药物和苯二氮卓类药物是常用的,但这些药物有明显的副作用,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)有黑框警告。加重毛毯与减少焦虑和改善睡眠有关。加重毛毯可能是减少住院痴呆患者躁动的一种非药物选择。目的:探讨加重毛毯对住院痴呆患者攻击和躁动行为的影响。方法:一项试点研究将对总共30名住院患者进行,这些患者的临床诊断为痴呆,并在医学或精神病学服务部门接受持续的激动行为。患者将被随机分配接受加重毛毯3晚或继续常规护理。主要结果是在3个晚上的研究期间Cohen-Mansfield躁动量表(CMAI-O)的观察版本的变化。次要结局是埃德蒙顿症状评估系统修订(ESAS-r)和临床总体印象(CGI)评分的变化、睡眠时间、抗精神病药物和苯二氮卓类药物的使用以及谵妄的发生率。将对常规护理和加权一揽子研究组完成相同的研究评估。在5个研究时间点(基线、第1晚、第2晚、第3晚以及最后一次使用加权毯后48-72小时的最终评估),将使用CMAI-O、ESAS-r和CGI工具对患者进行评估。所有的评估将由每天照顾病人的床边护士或病人护理助理完成。出院后2至4周内,研究协调员将与患者的法定授权代表(LAR)联系,评估是否继续使用加重毯。结果:受试者于2023年4月23日开始入组。截至2024年11月,共有24名参与者参加了这项研究。入组参与者的基线特征将在入组完成时进行分析和报告。我们预计在2026年3月之前完成数据收集。结论:本研究将确定加重毛毯对住院痴呆患者躁动的影响。加重毛毯对睡眠的影响也将得到进一步的了解。这项研究的结果将与越来越多的老年痴呆症患者表现出躁动的背景有关,这导致住院治疗、护理人员负担和医疗保健费用增加。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03643991;http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03643991.International注册报告标识符(irrid): DERR1-10.2196/57264。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Methods of Analysis in Randomized Noninferiority Trials: Methodological Survey Review Protocol. Evaluation of the Comparative Efficacy of an Ayurvedic Formulation (Nimba-Amalakyadi Powder) vs Metformin in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Protocol for a Pilot Study. Evaluation Models for Undergraduate Nursing Clinical Skills: A Scoping Review Protocol. Cardiovascular Health and Financial Hardship: Protocol for a Qualitative Citizen Science Study. Developing and Validating Measures of Structural Ableism to Improve Health Outcomes for the Disability Community: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1