Comparing Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Heated Tobacco Product Users, Cigarette Smokers, Former Smokers, and Never Smokers: Protocol for a Real-World Retrospective Study in Japan.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Research Protocols Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.2196/73437
Helene Karcher, Makoto Hibino, Shinichi Higashiue, Mohamad Haidar, Badrul Chowdhury, Patrick Picavet, Daniel Boakye, Adam Lenart
{"title":"Comparing Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Heated Tobacco Product Users, Cigarette Smokers, Former Smokers, and Never Smokers: Protocol for a Real-World Retrospective Study in Japan.","authors":"Helene Karcher, Makoto Hibino, Shinichi Higashiue, Mohamad Haidar, Badrul Chowdhury, Patrick Picavet, Daniel Boakye, Adam Lenart","doi":"10.2196/73437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoking is a known risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Despite widespread knowledge of the health risks of combustible cigarettes (CIG), many smokers continue to smoke. There have been efforts to provide alternatives, such as heated tobacco products (HTP), that may be less harmful than CIG.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of switching from CIG to HTP on the time to first subsequent major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) compared with continued CIG smoking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study will use health data from the Tokushukai Medical Database and tobacco exposure data from questionnaires and consumer databases in Japan. The study will include patients with a first cardiovascular event of non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, or urgent coronary revascularization between May 2016 and December 2020 (Index Event); patients will be observed until March 2025. The primary exposure of interest is HTP use, while the primary comparator is continued CIG smoking pre- and post-index. The primary outcome is first post-index MACE (a composite outcome of any of the following: non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, hospitalization for angina, hospitalization for heart failure, urgent revascularization for angina, or all-cause mortality). After accounting for potential confounding factors with a propensity score weighting method, weighted log-rank tests and a weighted non-proportional Cox model will be used to compare the primary outcome between the exposure groups. Dual use of CIG and HTP, quitting CIG, and never smoking will also be analyzed as ancillary exposure groups to address secondary objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study described in this protocol intends to assess whether there is a longer time to first MACE in HTP users as compared to CIG smokers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This protocol describes a large-scale study that intends to identify patients with CVD from a nationally representative healthcare database and utilizes multiple data sources to evaluate their history of tobacco product usage. This will be the first study to assess the effect of HTP use on CVD outcomes by sex. Given the limited evidence on the health impacts of HTP in relation to CVD, the results of this study will provide insights into the effect of switching to HTP use compared to continued CIG smoking in patients with a prior cardiovascular event.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/73437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Smoking is a known risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Despite widespread knowledge of the health risks of combustible cigarettes (CIG), many smokers continue to smoke. There have been efforts to provide alternatives, such as heated tobacco products (HTP), that may be less harmful than CIG.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of switching from CIG to HTP on the time to first subsequent major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) compared with continued CIG smoking.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study will use health data from the Tokushukai Medical Database and tobacco exposure data from questionnaires and consumer databases in Japan. The study will include patients with a first cardiovascular event of non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, or urgent coronary revascularization between May 2016 and December 2020 (Index Event); patients will be observed until March 2025. The primary exposure of interest is HTP use, while the primary comparator is continued CIG smoking pre- and post-index. The primary outcome is first post-index MACE (a composite outcome of any of the following: non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, hospitalization for angina, hospitalization for heart failure, urgent revascularization for angina, or all-cause mortality). After accounting for potential confounding factors with a propensity score weighting method, weighted log-rank tests and a weighted non-proportional Cox model will be used to compare the primary outcome between the exposure groups. Dual use of CIG and HTP, quitting CIG, and never smoking will also be analyzed as ancillary exposure groups to address secondary objectives.

Results: The study described in this protocol intends to assess whether there is a longer time to first MACE in HTP users as compared to CIG smokers.

Conclusions: This protocol describes a large-scale study that intends to identify patients with CVD from a nationally representative healthcare database and utilizes multiple data sources to evaluate their history of tobacco product usage. This will be the first study to assess the effect of HTP use on CVD outcomes by sex. Given the limited evidence on the health impacts of HTP in relation to CVD, the results of this study will provide insights into the effect of switching to HTP use compared to continued CIG smoking in patients with a prior cardiovascular event.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较加热烟草制品使用者、吸烟者、曾经吸烟者和从不吸烟者的心血管结局:日本一项真实世界回顾性研究的方案
背景:吸烟是已知的心血管疾病(CVD)危险因素。尽管人们普遍知道可燃香烟(CIG)对健康的危害,但许多吸烟者仍在继续吸烟。人们一直在努力提供替代品,例如加热烟草制品(HTP),它的危害可能比cigg小。目的:评价与继续吸烟相比,从cigg切换到HTP对首次发生重大心血管不良事件(MACE)时间的影响。方法:本回顾性队列研究将使用来自日本Tokushukai医学数据库的健康数据以及来自问卷调查和消费者数据库的烟草暴露数据。该研究将包括2016年5月至2020年12月期间首次心血管事件(非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、不稳定型心绞痛或紧急冠状动脉血运重建术)的患者;患者将被观察到2025年3月。主要关注的暴露是HTP使用,而主要比较者是指数前后持续吸烟。主要转归是第一次指数后MACE(以下任何一项的综合转归:非致死性心梗、非致死性卒中、心绞痛住院、心衰住院、心绞痛紧急血运重建术或全因死亡率)。在用倾向评分加权法考虑潜在的混杂因素后,将使用加权对数秩检验和加权非比例Cox模型来比较暴露组之间的主要结局。同时,还将分析CIG和HTP双重使用、戒烟和从不吸烟的辅助暴露组,以解决次要目标。结果:本方案中描述的研究旨在评估HTP使用者与cigg吸烟者相比是否有更长的时间出现第一次MACE。结论:本方案描述了一项大规模研究,旨在从具有全国代表性的医疗数据库中识别心血管疾病患者,并利用多种数据来源评估其烟草制品使用史。这将是第一个按性别评估HTP使用对CVD结果影响的研究。鉴于HTP与CVD相关的健康影响的证据有限,本研究的结果将为在既往心血管事件的患者中切换到使用HTP与继续吸烟的效果提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Efficacy Evaluation of Tuina Combined Medicated Oil in the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. International Clinical Practice Guidelines on Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapy for Dysmenorrhea: Development Protocol. A Supportive Group Intervention for Caregivers to Patients Diagnosed With Glioblastoma: Protocol for the SUGRI Study. The Use and Utility of Wearable Devices for Tracking Sleep and Activity in Inpatient Mental Health Settings: Protocol for a Rapid Review. Quality of Life of Patients With Multi-Organ Autoimmune Disease and Its Relationship to Patient-Centered Care: Protocol for a Longitudinal Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1