Improving Knowledge and Attitudes About Palliative Care Through Community Collaborations: A Mixed Methods Intervention Evaluation.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0363
Grant M Smith, Samantha M R Kling, Ashley Bragg, Ann Cao-Nasalga, Kelly Towey, Olivia Tigre Nerimora, Laura M Holdsworth
{"title":"Improving Knowledge and Attitudes About Palliative Care Through Community Collaborations: A Mixed Methods Intervention Evaluation.","authors":"Grant M Smith, Samantha M R Kling, Ashley Bragg, Ann Cao-Nasalga, Kelly Towey, Olivia Tigre Nerimora, Laura M Holdsworth","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Limited knowledge and negative perceptions of palliative care (PC) can result in missed opportunities to access specialty PC. Patient, caregiver, and community education may improve knowledge and attitudes about PC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Pre- and post-session surveys along with qualitative interivews assessed whether participation in a novel 60-minute webinar about specialty PC changed participants' PC knowledge and attitudes. Participants were recruited in collaboration with community based organizations and included self-identified patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, and other individuals interested in the topic. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 118 participants completed pre- and post-session surveys. Participants demonstrated a significant increase in PC knowledge on the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (10.6 vs. 12.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Pre-session attitudes were positive and further improved after the educational session. Qualitative interviews demonstrated that participants learned that PC provides more services than previously thought and could ask for a PC referral. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> We conclude that a 60-minute webinar improved knowledge and attitudes about specialty PC, including a willingness to ask for and accept a referral to PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"931-939"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0363","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limited knowledge and negative perceptions of palliative care (PC) can result in missed opportunities to access specialty PC. Patient, caregiver, and community education may improve knowledge and attitudes about PC. Methods: Pre- and post-session surveys along with qualitative interivews assessed whether participation in a novel 60-minute webinar about specialty PC changed participants' PC knowledge and attitudes. Participants were recruited in collaboration with community based organizations and included self-identified patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, and other individuals interested in the topic. Results: A total of 118 participants completed pre- and post-session surveys. Participants demonstrated a significant increase in PC knowledge on the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (10.6 vs. 12.5, p < 0.001). Pre-session attitudes were positive and further improved after the educational session. Qualitative interviews demonstrated that participants learned that PC provides more services than previously thought and could ask for a PC referral. Conclusion: We conclude that a 60-minute webinar improved knowledge and attitudes about specialty PC, including a willingness to ask for and accept a referral to PC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过社区合作提高对姑息治疗的认识和态度:一种混合方法干预评估。
背景:有限的知识和消极的看法姑息治疗(PC)可能导致错过机会获得专业PC。患者、护理者和社区教育可以提高对PC的认识和态度。方法:通过事前和事后的调查以及定性访谈来评估参加一个新颖的60分钟关于专业PC的网络研讨会是否改变了参与者的PC知识和态度。参与者是与社区组织合作招募的,包括自我认定的患者、护理人员、医疗保健提供者和其他对该主题感兴趣的个人。结果:共有118名参与者完成了会前和会后调查。参与者在姑息治疗知识量表上的PC知识显著增加(10.6 vs. 12.5, p < 0.001)。课程前的态度是积极的,在教育课程后进一步改善。定性访谈表明,参与者了解到PC提供的服务比以前想象的要多,并且可以要求PC推荐。结论:我们得出的结论是,一个60分钟的网络研讨会提高了专业PC的知识和态度,包括愿意要求和接受转介到PC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
Psychotherapeutically Informed Serious Illness Communication: Series Introduction. A Buprenorphine Pocket Card and Tool Kit Tailored to Palliative Care Clinicians: An Education and Implementation Cohort Study. Avoidance: Exposure Therapy Informed Communication for Serious Illness Care. Ultrasound-Derived Muscle Biomarkers as a Gateway toward Quantitative Pediatric Frailty in Palliative Care. Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Caring for People with Postintensive Care Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1