Machine learning analysis of cortical activity in visual associative learning tasks with differing stimulus complexity.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Physiology international Pub Date : 2025-02-27 Print Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1556/2060.2025.00475
Ádám Kiss, Kálmán Tót, Noémi Harcsa-Pintér, Zoltán Juhász, Gabriella Eördegh, Attila Nagy, András Kelemen
{"title":"Machine learning analysis of cortical activity in visual associative learning tasks with differing stimulus complexity.","authors":"Ádám Kiss, Kálmán Tót, Noémi Harcsa-Pintér, Zoltán Juhász, Gabriella Eördegh, Attila Nagy, András Kelemen","doi":"10.1556/2060.2025.00475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Associative learning tests are cognitive assessments that evaluate the ability of individuals to learn and remember relationships between pairs of stimuli. The Rutgers Acquired Equivalence Test (RAET) is an associative learning test that utilizes images (cartoon faces and colored fish) as stimuli. RAET exists in various versions that differ in the degree of the complexity of the stimuli used in the given version. It has been observed that differences in stimulus complexity can lead to marked differences in test performance, but the related cortical functional differences remain to be elucidated. In the present study, we introduce a Machine Learning- and Independent Component Analysis-based EEG signal processing pipeline, which can detect such differences. RAET and its reduced stimulus complexity variant, Polygon was administered to 32 healthy volunteers and EEG recordings were made with a 64-channel system. The most remarkable differences between RAET and Polygon were detected in the frontal regions, which can be connected to decision making. On the other hand, the parietal regions showed the lowest number of differences between RAET and Polygon. Some task-related activity in the temporo-occipital region was identified, which shows different dynamics depending on visual stimulus complexity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20058,"journal":{"name":"Physiology international","volume":" ","pages":"40-55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2060.2025.00475","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Associative learning tests are cognitive assessments that evaluate the ability of individuals to learn and remember relationships between pairs of stimuli. The Rutgers Acquired Equivalence Test (RAET) is an associative learning test that utilizes images (cartoon faces and colored fish) as stimuli. RAET exists in various versions that differ in the degree of the complexity of the stimuli used in the given version. It has been observed that differences in stimulus complexity can lead to marked differences in test performance, but the related cortical functional differences remain to be elucidated. In the present study, we introduce a Machine Learning- and Independent Component Analysis-based EEG signal processing pipeline, which can detect such differences. RAET and its reduced stimulus complexity variant, Polygon was administered to 32 healthy volunteers and EEG recordings were made with a 64-channel system. The most remarkable differences between RAET and Polygon were detected in the frontal regions, which can be connected to decision making. On the other hand, the parietal regions showed the lowest number of differences between RAET and Polygon. Some task-related activity in the temporo-occipital region was identified, which shows different dynamics depending on visual stimulus complexity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同刺激复杂性下视觉联想学习任务皮层活动的机器学习分析。
联想学习测试是评估个人学习和记忆刺激物对之间关系的能力的认知评估。罗格斯获得性等效性测试(RAET)是一种利用图像(卡通面孔和彩色鱼)作为刺激的联想学习测试。RAET存在于不同的版本,在给定版本中使用的刺激的复杂程度不同。刺激复杂性的差异会导致测试表现的显著差异,但相关的皮质功能差异仍有待阐明。在本研究中,我们引入了一种基于机器学习和独立分量分析的脑电信号处理管道,可以检测这种差异。对32名健康志愿者进行RAET及其减少刺激复杂性的变体Polygon,并使用64通道系统进行脑电图记录。RAET和Polygon在与决策相关的额叶区差异最显著。另一方面,顶叶区域在RAET和Polygon之间的差异最少。在颞枕区发现了一些与任务相关的活动,这些活动根据视觉刺激的复杂性表现出不同的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiology international
Physiology international Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The journal provides a forum for important new research papers written by eminent scientists on experimental medical sciences. Papers reporting on both original work and review articles in the fields of basic and clinical physiology, pathophysiology (from the subcellular organization level up to the oranizmic one), as well as related disciplines, including history of physiological sciences, are accepted.
期刊最新文献
Virtual reality in pulmonary rehabilitation: A systematic review of clinical outcomes in COPD and post-COVID conditions. Pre-landing quadriceps vibration improves single-leg landing mechanics under fresh conditions but fails after combined cognitive-physical fatigue. Proprioceptive training reduces headache burden and center of pressure path length in patients with cervicogenic headache: A randomized controlled trial. Exercise intervention for obesity via modulating metabolic flexibility: A molecular perspective (review). The role of adrenergic receptors and sex steroid hormones in takotsubo syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1