Advancing oil and gas emissions assessment through large language model data extraction

IF 9.6 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Energy and AI Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100481
Zhenlin Chen , Roujia Zhong , Wennan Long , Haoyu Tang , Anjing Wang , Zemin Liu , Xuelin Yang , Bo Ren , James Littlefield , Sanmi Koyejo , Mohammad S. Masnadi , Adam R. Brandt
{"title":"Advancing oil and gas emissions assessment through large language model data extraction","authors":"Zhenlin Chen ,&nbsp;Roujia Zhong ,&nbsp;Wennan Long ,&nbsp;Haoyu Tang ,&nbsp;Anjing Wang ,&nbsp;Zemin Liu ,&nbsp;Xuelin Yang ,&nbsp;Bo Ren ,&nbsp;James Littlefield ,&nbsp;Sanmi Koyejo ,&nbsp;Mohammad S. Masnadi ,&nbsp;Adam R. Brandt","doi":"10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The oil and gas industry strives to improve environmental stewardship and reduce its carbon footprint, but lacks comprehensive global operational data for accurate environmental assessment and decision-making. This challenge is compounded by dispersed information sources and the high costs of accessing proprietary databases. This paper presents an innovative framework using Large Language Models (LLMs) – specifically GPT-4 and GPT-4o – to extract critical oil and gas asset information from diverse literature sources.</div><div>Our framework employs iterative comparisons between GPT-4’s output and a dataset of 129 ground truth documents labeled by domain experts. Through 11 training and testing iterations, we fine-tuned prompts to optimize information extraction. The evaluation process assessed performance using true positive rate, precision, and F1 score metrics. The framework achieved strong results, with a true positive rate of 83.74% and an F1 score of 78.16% on the testing dataset.</div><div>The system demonstrated remarkable efficiency, processing 32 documents in 61.41 min with GPT-4o, averaging 7.09 s per extraction - a substantial improvement over the manual method. Cost-effectiveness was also achieved, with GPT-4o reducing extraction costs by a factor of 10 compared to GPT-4.</div><div>This research has significant implications for the oil and gas industry. By creating an organized, transparent, and accessible database, we aim to democratize access to critical information. The framework supports more accurate climate modeling efforts, enhances decision-making processes for operations and investments, and contributes to the sector’s ability to meet environmental commitments. These improvements particularly impact emissions reduction and energy transition strategies, potentially transforming how data is extracted and utilized in this field and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34138,"journal":{"name":"Energy and AI","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100481"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666546825000138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The oil and gas industry strives to improve environmental stewardship and reduce its carbon footprint, but lacks comprehensive global operational data for accurate environmental assessment and decision-making. This challenge is compounded by dispersed information sources and the high costs of accessing proprietary databases. This paper presents an innovative framework using Large Language Models (LLMs) – specifically GPT-4 and GPT-4o – to extract critical oil and gas asset information from diverse literature sources.
Our framework employs iterative comparisons between GPT-4’s output and a dataset of 129 ground truth documents labeled by domain experts. Through 11 training and testing iterations, we fine-tuned prompts to optimize information extraction. The evaluation process assessed performance using true positive rate, precision, and F1 score metrics. The framework achieved strong results, with a true positive rate of 83.74% and an F1 score of 78.16% on the testing dataset.
The system demonstrated remarkable efficiency, processing 32 documents in 61.41 min with GPT-4o, averaging 7.09 s per extraction - a substantial improvement over the manual method. Cost-effectiveness was also achieved, with GPT-4o reducing extraction costs by a factor of 10 compared to GPT-4.
This research has significant implications for the oil and gas industry. By creating an organized, transparent, and accessible database, we aim to democratize access to critical information. The framework supports more accurate climate modeling efforts, enhances decision-making processes for operations and investments, and contributes to the sector’s ability to meet environmental commitments. These improvements particularly impact emissions reduction and energy transition strategies, potentially transforming how data is extracted and utilized in this field and beyond.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and AI
Energy and AI Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Hybrid forecasting of demand flexibility: A top-down approach for thermostatically controlled loads Advancing oil and gas emissions assessment through large language model data extraction Hybrid transformer model with liquid neural networks and learnable encodings for buildings’ energy forecasting Metaheuristic multi-objective optimization with artificial neural networks surrogate modeling for optimal energy-economic performance for CSP technology Deciphering city-level residential AMI data: An unsupervised data mining framework and case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1