The Analysis of Controlled Flight Into Terrain Incidents From Flight Crew Perspective Using Named Entity Recognition and Bayesian Networks

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Advanced Transportation Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1155/atr/8225597
Junjie Liu, Wenzheng Yi, Aihua Zhang, Pengcheng Tian
{"title":"The Analysis of Controlled Flight Into Terrain Incidents From Flight Crew Perspective Using Named Entity Recognition and Bayesian Networks","authors":"Junjie Liu,&nbsp;Wenzheng Yi,&nbsp;Aihua Zhang,&nbsp;Pengcheng Tian","doi":"10.1155/atr/8225597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) can result in significant aircraft damage and human casualties. Analyzing incident factors and their evolutionary relationships in aviation safety reports helps explore the inherent mechanisms of CFIT, thereby potentially reducing their occurrence. This study proposes a methodology combining named entity recognition (NER) and Bayesian network (BN) to address the challenges of efficiently extracting incident factors from textual reports from the crew’s perspective and analyzing the overall evolution process of CFIT incidents to better prevent accidents. First, this study collected 354 CFIT incident reports in the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) for the period November 2021 to August 2023. Second, important concepts from Threat and Error Management (TEM) were referenced to determine principles for extracting factor types and their evolutionary relationships. Third, NER was applied using the BERT–BiLSTM–MHA–CRF model to extract incident factors, followed by model comparison. Experimental results demonstrated good performance with precision, recall, and <i>F</i>1 score of 0.97, 0.90, and 0.90, respectively. Last, BN was then employed to analyze the CFIT evolution process. Results indicate that if factors such as Terrain (0.04) and Unfamiliarity/Inexperience (0.036) are present, CFIT risk will increase. Conversely, if protective factors such as Perfect Weather/Great Visibility (0.397) and Perform the Escape Maneuver (0.341) are present, CFIT risk will decrease. The analysis reveals that Airline Operational Pressure, Fatigue (57%), Lack of Situational Awareness (21%), Automation Errors (45%), Aircraft Handling Deviations (34%), Aviation System–Based Countermeasures (72%), Perform the Escape Maneuver (75%), and Make a Stabilized Approach (89%) form the highest probability evolution pathway for CFIT incidents. This study concludes that reducing these identified risk factors and increasing protective factors can contribute to reducing CFIT accidents.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/atr/8225597","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/atr/8225597","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) can result in significant aircraft damage and human casualties. Analyzing incident factors and their evolutionary relationships in aviation safety reports helps explore the inherent mechanisms of CFIT, thereby potentially reducing their occurrence. This study proposes a methodology combining named entity recognition (NER) and Bayesian network (BN) to address the challenges of efficiently extracting incident factors from textual reports from the crew’s perspective and analyzing the overall evolution process of CFIT incidents to better prevent accidents. First, this study collected 354 CFIT incident reports in the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) for the period November 2021 to August 2023. Second, important concepts from Threat and Error Management (TEM) were referenced to determine principles for extracting factor types and their evolutionary relationships. Third, NER was applied using the BERT–BiLSTM–MHA–CRF model to extract incident factors, followed by model comparison. Experimental results demonstrated good performance with precision, recall, and F1 score of 0.97, 0.90, and 0.90, respectively. Last, BN was then employed to analyze the CFIT evolution process. Results indicate that if factors such as Terrain (0.04) and Unfamiliarity/Inexperience (0.036) are present, CFIT risk will increase. Conversely, if protective factors such as Perfect Weather/Great Visibility (0.397) and Perform the Escape Maneuver (0.341) are present, CFIT risk will decrease. The analysis reveals that Airline Operational Pressure, Fatigue (57%), Lack of Situational Awareness (21%), Automation Errors (45%), Aircraft Handling Deviations (34%), Aviation System–Based Countermeasures (72%), Perform the Escape Maneuver (75%), and Make a Stabilized Approach (89%) form the highest probability evolution pathway for CFIT incidents. This study concludes that reducing these identified risk factors and increasing protective factors can contribute to reducing CFIT accidents.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受控飞行进入地形(CFIT)可导致严重的飞机损坏和人员伤亡。分析航空安全报告中的事故因素及其演变关系有助于探索受控飞行进入地形(CFIT)的内在机制,从而有可能减少事故的发生。本研究提出了一种结合命名实体识别(NER)和贝叶斯网络(BN)的方法,以解决从机组人员视角高效提取文本报告中的事故因素并分析 CFIT 事故整体演变过程的难题,从而更好地预防事故的发生。首先,本研究从航空安全报告系统(ASRS)中收集了 354 份 2021 年 11 月至 2023 年 8 月期间的 CFIT 事故报告。其次,参考威胁与错误管理(TEM)的重要概念,确定提取因素类型及其演变关系的原则。第三,使用 BERT-BiLSTM-MHA-CRF 模型提取事件因素,然后进行模型比较。实验结果表明,精确度、召回率和 F1 分数分别为 0.97、0.90 和 0.90,表现良好。最后,利用 BN 对 CFIT 演化过程进行分析。结果表明,如果存在地形(0.04)和不熟悉/无经验(0.036)等因素,CFIT 风险就会增加。相反,如果存在完美天气/良好能见度(0.397)和执行逃生演习(0.341)等保护因素,则 CFIT 风险会降低。分析表明,航空公司运营压力、疲劳(57%)、缺乏态势感知(21%)、自动化错误(45%)、飞机操纵偏差(34%)、基于航空系统的应对措施(72%)、执行逃生操纵(75%)和稳定进近(89%)构成了 CFIT 事故的最高概率演变途径。本研究的结论是,减少这些已确定的风险因素并增加保护因素有助于减少 CFIT 事故。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Transportation
Journal of Advanced Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Transportation (JAT) is a fully peer reviewed international journal in transportation research areas related to public transit, road traffic, transport networks and air transport. It publishes theoretical and innovative papers on analysis, design, operations, optimization and planning of multi-modal transport networks, transit & traffic systems, transport technology and traffic safety. Urban rail and bus systems, Pedestrian studies, traffic flow theory and control, Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) and automated and/or connected vehicles are some topics of interest. Highway engineering, railway engineering and logistics do not fall within the aims and scope of JAT.
期刊最新文献
Simulation Optimization of Shovel-Truck System in Open-Pit Mines Considering Rockmass Parameters Familial Aggregation of High-Risk Driving Behaviors in Northwestern Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study Investigating Factors Contributing to Urban Traffic Incident Risk Using High-Resolution Heterogeneous Data The Analysis of Controlled Flight Into Terrain Incidents From Flight Crew Perspective Using Named Entity Recognition and Bayesian Networks Influence of Vehicular Flow Instability in a Transport Network on Risk Reduction: Test in a Two-Link Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1