{"title":"(Q)SAR Approaches to Predict the Extent of Nitrosation in Pharmaceutical Compounds.","authors":"Krystle Reiss, Roustem Saiakhov, Suman Chakravarti","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since their discovery as impurities in numerous pharmaceuticals beginning in 2018, there has been a strong push to predict and prevent the formation of mutagenic nitrosamines. Several experimental methods, particularly the Nitrosation Assay Procedure, have been developed to predict a molecule's susceptibility to nitrosation. Here, we have compiled the results of hundreds of these experiments from the literature to construct two structure-activity relationship models: a statistical model and an expert rule-based model. The statistical model has been built with graph neural networks and was trained on a dataset of 207 nitrogen-containing molecules. This model makes a binary call for each nitrogen center, predicting if it is likely to be nitrosated or not. Conversely, the rule-based model labels each possible nitrosamine product as one of four categories, ranging from \"unlikely\" to \"very likely\". It makes this determination based on 15 rules, which cover 12 deactivating (inhibit nitrosation) and 3 activating (favor nitrosation) features that have been drawn from the literature. Both models perform remarkably well, with accuracies of ∼80%. The rule-based model is generally biased toward favoring nitrosation while the statistical model is more likely to classify an amine as un-nitrosatable due to the makeup of the dataset. Using the models together can balance these biases and further improve the reliability of both.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since their discovery as impurities in numerous pharmaceuticals beginning in 2018, there has been a strong push to predict and prevent the formation of mutagenic nitrosamines. Several experimental methods, particularly the Nitrosation Assay Procedure, have been developed to predict a molecule's susceptibility to nitrosation. Here, we have compiled the results of hundreds of these experiments from the literature to construct two structure-activity relationship models: a statistical model and an expert rule-based model. The statistical model has been built with graph neural networks and was trained on a dataset of 207 nitrogen-containing molecules. This model makes a binary call for each nitrogen center, predicting if it is likely to be nitrosated or not. Conversely, the rule-based model labels each possible nitrosamine product as one of four categories, ranging from "unlikely" to "very likely". It makes this determination based on 15 rules, which cover 12 deactivating (inhibit nitrosation) and 3 activating (favor nitrosation) features that have been drawn from the literature. Both models perform remarkably well, with accuracies of ∼80%. The rule-based model is generally biased toward favoring nitrosation while the statistical model is more likely to classify an amine as un-nitrosatable due to the makeup of the dataset. Using the models together can balance these biases and further improve the reliability of both.
期刊介绍:
Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.