The EU project Real4Reg: unlocking real-world data with AI.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Research Policy and Systems Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1186/s12961-025-01287-y
Jonas Peltner, Cornelia Becker, Julia Wicherski, Silja Wortberg, Mohamed Aborageh, Inês Costa, Vera Ehrenstein, Joana Fernandes, Steffen Heß, Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó, Monika Roberta Korcinska Handest, Manuel Lentzen, Peggy Maguire, Niels Henrik Meedom, Rebecca Moore, Vanessa Moore, Dávid Nagy, Hillary McNamara, Anne Paakinaho, Kerstin Pfeifer, Liisa Pylkkänen, Blair Rajamaki, Evy Reviers, Christoph Röthlein, Martin Russek, Célia Silva, Dirk De Valck, Thuan Vo, Elvira Bräuner, Holger Fröhlich, Cláudia Furtado, Sirpa Hartikainen, Aleksi Kallio, Anna-Maija Tolppanen, Britta Haenisch
{"title":"The EU project Real4Reg: unlocking real-world data with AI.","authors":"Jonas Peltner, Cornelia Becker, Julia Wicherski, Silja Wortberg, Mohamed Aborageh, Inês Costa, Vera Ehrenstein, Joana Fernandes, Steffen Heß, Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó, Monika Roberta Korcinska Handest, Manuel Lentzen, Peggy Maguire, Niels Henrik Meedom, Rebecca Moore, Vanessa Moore, Dávid Nagy, Hillary McNamara, Anne Paakinaho, Kerstin Pfeifer, Liisa Pylkkänen, Blair Rajamaki, Evy Reviers, Christoph Röthlein, Martin Russek, Célia Silva, Dirk De Valck, Thuan Vo, Elvira Bräuner, Holger Fröhlich, Cláudia Furtado, Sirpa Hartikainen, Aleksi Kallio, Anna-Maija Tolppanen, Britta Haenisch","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01287-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of real-world data is established in post-authorization regulatory processes such as pharmacovigilance of drugs and medical devices, but is still frequently challenged in the pre-authorization phase of medicinal products. In addition, the use of real-world data, even in post-authorization steps, is constrained by the availability and heterogeneity of real-world data and by challenges in analysing data from different settings and sources. Moreover, there are emerging opportunities in the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare research, but also a lack of knowledge on its appropriate application to heterogeneous real-world data sources to increase evidentiary value in the regulatory decision-making and health technology assessment context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Real4Reg project aims to enable the use of real-world data by developing user-friendly solutions for the data analytical needs of health regulatory and health technology assessment bodies across the European Union. These include artificial intelligence algorithms for the effective analysis of real-world data in regulatory decision-making and health technology assessment. The project aims to investigate the value of real-world data from different sources to generate high-quality, accessible, population-based information relevant along the product life cycle. A total of four use cases are used to provide good practice examples for analyses of real-world data for the evaluation and pre-authorization stage, the improvement of methods for external validity in observational data, for post-authorization safety studies and comparative effectiveness using real-world data. This position paper introduces the objectives and structure of the Real4Reg project and discusses its important role in the context of existing European projects focussing on real-world data.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Real4Reg focusses on the identification and description of benefits and risks of new and optimized methods in real-world data analysis including aspects of safety, effectiveness, interoperability, appropriateness, accessibility, comparative value creation and sustainability. The project's results will support better decision-making about medicines and benefit patients' health. Trial registration Real4Reg is registered in the HMA-EMA Catalogues of real-world data sources and studies (EU PAS number EUPAS105544).</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01287-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of real-world data is established in post-authorization regulatory processes such as pharmacovigilance of drugs and medical devices, but is still frequently challenged in the pre-authorization phase of medicinal products. In addition, the use of real-world data, even in post-authorization steps, is constrained by the availability and heterogeneity of real-world data and by challenges in analysing data from different settings and sources. Moreover, there are emerging opportunities in the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare research, but also a lack of knowledge on its appropriate application to heterogeneous real-world data sources to increase evidentiary value in the regulatory decision-making and health technology assessment context.

Methods: The Real4Reg project aims to enable the use of real-world data by developing user-friendly solutions for the data analytical needs of health regulatory and health technology assessment bodies across the European Union. These include artificial intelligence algorithms for the effective analysis of real-world data in regulatory decision-making and health technology assessment. The project aims to investigate the value of real-world data from different sources to generate high-quality, accessible, population-based information relevant along the product life cycle. A total of four use cases are used to provide good practice examples for analyses of real-world data for the evaluation and pre-authorization stage, the improvement of methods for external validity in observational data, for post-authorization safety studies and comparative effectiveness using real-world data. This position paper introduces the objectives and structure of the Real4Reg project and discusses its important role in the context of existing European projects focussing on real-world data.

Discussion: Real4Reg focusses on the identification and description of benefits and risks of new and optimized methods in real-world data analysis including aspects of safety, effectiveness, interoperability, appropriateness, accessibility, comparative value creation and sustainability. The project's results will support better decision-making about medicines and benefit patients' health. Trial registration Real4Reg is registered in the HMA-EMA Catalogues of real-world data sources and studies (EU PAS number EUPAS105544).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟项目Real4Reg:用人工智能解锁现实世界的数据。
背景:真实数据的使用是在批准后的监管过程中建立的,例如药物和医疗器械的药物警戒,但在药品的预授权阶段仍然经常受到挑战。此外,即使在授权后的步骤中,真实数据的使用也受到真实数据的可用性和异质性以及分析来自不同设置和来源的数据的挑战的限制。此外,在医疗保健研究中使用人工智能出现了新的机会,但也缺乏将其适当应用于异构现实世界数据源以增加监管决策和卫生技术评估背景下的证据价值的知识。方法:Real4Reg项目旨在通过开发用户友好的解决方案,满足整个欧盟卫生监管和卫生技术评估机构的数据分析需求,从而使用真实世界的数据。其中包括在监管决策和卫生技术评估中有效分析真实世界数据的人工智能算法。该项目旨在调查来自不同来源的真实世界数据的价值,以生成高质量、可访问的、基于人群的产品生命周期相关信息。总共使用了四个用例,为评估和预授权阶段的真实数据分析、观察数据外部有效性方法的改进、授权后安全性研究和使用真实数据的比较有效性提供了良好的实践示例。本立场文件介绍了Real4Reg项目的目标和结构,并讨论了其在现有欧洲项目中关注现实世界数据的重要作用。讨论:real4regg侧重于识别和描述现实世界数据分析中新的和优化的方法的收益和风险,包括安全性、有效性、互操作性、适当性、可访问性、相对价值创造和可持续性等方面。该项目的结果将支持更好的药物决策,并有利于患者的健康。试验注册real4regg在HMA-EMA真实世界数据源和研究目录中注册(EU PAS号EUPAS105544)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
期刊最新文献
Method for and potential value of reflexive stakeholder mapping of a policy evaluation team: the example of the national evaluation of the NHS Pharmacy First scheme. Barriers and opportunities for participation in health policy decision-making by civil society groups organized for cancer in Chile: a qualitative study. Cross-national variations and demographic disparities in health surveillance system performance: a comparative analysis of OECD member countries. Towards socially robust policy modelling: scoping review of public involvement in computational policy modelling. Participatory systems mapping: a review of population health research practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1