Transradial cerebral angiography: predicting left ICA selective angiography success using pre-diagnostic aortic arch factors.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI:10.1136/jnis-2024-022842
Jin Eun, Seung Yoon Song, Sang Hyuk Im, Hae Kwan Park
{"title":"Transradial cerebral angiography: predicting left ICA selective angiography success using pre-diagnostic aortic arch factors.","authors":"Jin Eun, Seung Yoon Song, Sang Hyuk Im, Hae Kwan Park","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transradial cerebral angiography (TRA) is a convenient but challenging procedure, particularly for selecting the left internal carotid artery (ICA) and vertebral artery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To predict the selection of the left ICA using CT and MR images acquired before TRA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 306 patients with TRA were enrolled and divided into either the group with success (264 patients) or the failure (42 patients) group. The following anatomical factors were measured: A1 (subclavian artery angle), A2 (right subclavian-innominate artery angle), A3 (innominate-left common carotid artery angle), D1 (aorta to right subclavian artery length), and D2 (innominate-to-left common carotid artery length).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median values for A1, A2, A3, D1, and D2 were 81.57° (IQR 69.26-94.14), 147.03° (125.73-161.09), 24.73 (15.85-37.72°), 34.73 mm (29.68-38.48), and 13.15 mm (11.33-15.64), respectively, with significant differences observed between the successful and failure groups in A3 (26.88° vs 15.50°; P<0.001), D1 (34.24 mm vs 37.62 mm; P<0.001), and D2 (12.78 mm vs 14.91 mm; P<0.001). The aortic arch type did not affect success (P=0.134), while patients in the failure group were significantly older (P<0.001). A predictive logistic regression model was developed, revealing differing factor impacts when controlling variables. The model (area under the curve 0.87) highlights data complexity and enables user-friendly prediction of left ICA-selective TRA success (https://je0000000342227505.shinyapps.io/icatra/).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the success of left ICA selective angiography can be predicted using aortic arch images, providing a basis for the extension of TRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"508-512"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022842","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transradial cerebral angiography (TRA) is a convenient but challenging procedure, particularly for selecting the left internal carotid artery (ICA) and vertebral artery.

Objective: To predict the selection of the left ICA using CT and MR images acquired before TRA.

Methods: Overall, 306 patients with TRA were enrolled and divided into either the group with success (264 patients) or the failure (42 patients) group. The following anatomical factors were measured: A1 (subclavian artery angle), A2 (right subclavian-innominate artery angle), A3 (innominate-left common carotid artery angle), D1 (aorta to right subclavian artery length), and D2 (innominate-to-left common carotid artery length).

Results: The median values for A1, A2, A3, D1, and D2 were 81.57° (IQR 69.26-94.14), 147.03° (125.73-161.09), 24.73 (15.85-37.72°), 34.73 mm (29.68-38.48), and 13.15 mm (11.33-15.64), respectively, with significant differences observed between the successful and failure groups in A3 (26.88° vs 15.50°; P<0.001), D1 (34.24 mm vs 37.62 mm; P<0.001), and D2 (12.78 mm vs 14.91 mm; P<0.001). The aortic arch type did not affect success (P=0.134), while patients in the failure group were significantly older (P<0.001). A predictive logistic regression model was developed, revealing differing factor impacts when controlling variables. The model (area under the curve 0.87) highlights data complexity and enables user-friendly prediction of left ICA-selective TRA success (https://je0000000342227505.shinyapps.io/icatra/).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the success of left ICA selective angiography can be predicted using aortic arch images, providing a basis for the extension of TRA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经桡动脉脑血管造影:利用诊断前主动脉弓因素预测左ICA选择性血管造影成功。
背景:经桡动脉脑血管造影(TRA)是一种方便但具有挑战性的手术,特别是在选择左颈内动脉(ICA)和椎动脉时。目的:利用TRA前CT和MR图像预测左侧ICA的选择。方法:共纳入306例TRA患者,分为成功组(264例)和失败组(42例)。测量以下解剖因子:A1(锁骨下动脉角)、A2(右锁骨下-无名动脉角)、A3(无名-左颈总动脉角)、D1(主动脉至右锁骨下动脉长度)、D2(无名-左颈总动脉长度)。结果:A1、A2、A3、D1、D2的中位值分别为81.57°(IQR 69.26 ~ 94.14)、147.03°(IQR 125.73 ~ 161.09)、24.73°(IQR 15.85 ~ 37.72°)、34.73 mm (IQR 29.68 ~ 38.48)、13.15 mm (IQR 11.33 ~ 15.64), A3成功组与失败组间差异有统计学意义(IQR 26.88°vs 15.50°;结论:本研究可以通过主动脉弓图像预测左ICA选择性血管造影的成功与否,为TRA的延伸提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
期刊最新文献
Safety of endovascular shunting for normal pressure hydrocephalus from a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study. Reperfusion grade and clinical outcome following medium vessel occlusion thrombectomy in the Endovascular Treatment to Improve Outcomes for Medium Vessel Occlusions (ESCAPE-MeVO) trial. Development, image interpretation, clinical experience, and applications of optical coherence tomography in neurointerventional surgery. Mechanical thrombectomy versus medical management for pediatric ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Predictors and clinical correlates of stent fracture after rapamycin-eluting vertebral artery stenting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1