Clinical comparison of modified sinus tarsi approach and L-shaped approach in open reduction and internal fixation for Sanders typeIII-IV intra-articular calcaneal fractures: Complications, security, effectiveness analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Science Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2025.02.004
Yang Bin, Zhang Xingguo, Li Hua, Wang Decheng
{"title":"Clinical comparison of modified sinus tarsi approach and L-shaped approach in open reduction and internal fixation for Sanders typeIII-IV intra-articular calcaneal fractures: Complications, security, effectiveness analysis.","authors":"Yang Bin, Zhang Xingguo, Li Hua, Wang Decheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>L-shaped incision is the most widely used approach for treating calcaneal fracture; however, it has been associated with various complications, such as wound infection, skin edge necrosis, postoperative fracture malunion, and traumatic arthritis. Accordingly, this surgical approach should be re-examined. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect and safety of the modified sinus tarsi approach in open reduction and internal fixation for Sanders type III-IV calcaneal fractures and compare it with the traditional L-shaped approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled 72 patients with unilateral closed Sanders type III-IV calcaneal fractures treated with a modified sinus tarsi approach (38 patients) and L-shaped approach (34 patients) from May 2018 to June 2020. Postoperative complications and changes in calcaneal Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and Varus angle were observed and compared between the two groups before and 3 days, and 12 months after the operation. At 12 months after the operation, the Maryland foot function score, AOFAS score, and VAS score were used to evaluate the recovery of foot function in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified tarsal sinus approach group had significantly shorter incision healing time (9.8 ± 1.9 d) and operation time (75.53 ± 21.12 min), as well as fewer wound-healing complications (2.6 %) compared to the L-shaped approach group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the Böhler, Gissane, and Varus angles between the two groups after the operation. At 12 months after the operation, no significant differences were observed in Maryland, AOFAS, and VAS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified sinus tarsi and L-shaped approaches had similar clinical effects in the treatment of Sanders type III-IV calcaneal fractures. However, the treatment of modified sinus tarsi approaches in open reduction and internal fixation for Sanders type III-IV calcaneal fractures implies small incision, low degree of soft tissue injury, and low wound-healing complications, thus resulting in an effective minimally invasive treatment for Sanders type III-IV calcaneal fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.02.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: L-shaped incision is the most widely used approach for treating calcaneal fracture; however, it has been associated with various complications, such as wound infection, skin edge necrosis, postoperative fracture malunion, and traumatic arthritis. Accordingly, this surgical approach should be re-examined. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect and safety of the modified sinus tarsi approach in open reduction and internal fixation for Sanders type III-IV calcaneal fractures and compare it with the traditional L-shaped approach.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 72 patients with unilateral closed Sanders type III-IV calcaneal fractures treated with a modified sinus tarsi approach (38 patients) and L-shaped approach (34 patients) from May 2018 to June 2020. Postoperative complications and changes in calcaneal Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and Varus angle were observed and compared between the two groups before and 3 days, and 12 months after the operation. At 12 months after the operation, the Maryland foot function score, AOFAS score, and VAS score were used to evaluate the recovery of foot function in both groups.

Results: The modified tarsal sinus approach group had significantly shorter incision healing time (9.8 ± 1.9 d) and operation time (75.53 ± 21.12 min), as well as fewer wound-healing complications (2.6 %) compared to the L-shaped approach group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the Böhler, Gissane, and Varus angles between the two groups after the operation. At 12 months after the operation, no significant differences were observed in Maryland, AOFAS, and VAS scores.

Conclusion: The modified sinus tarsi and L-shaped approaches had similar clinical effects in the treatment of Sanders type III-IV calcaneal fractures. However, the treatment of modified sinus tarsi approaches in open reduction and internal fixation for Sanders type III-IV calcaneal fractures implies small incision, low degree of soft tissue injury, and low wound-healing complications, thus resulting in an effective minimally invasive treatment for Sanders type III-IV calcaneal fractures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
期刊最新文献
Association between central sensitization and multisite pain in the general population: A cross-sectional analysis of The Wakayama Health Promotion Study. Clinical comparison of modified sinus tarsi approach and L-shaped approach in open reduction and internal fixation for Sanders typeIII-IV intra-articular calcaneal fractures: Complications, security, effectiveness analysis. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of lateral meniscus extrusion likely indicates posterior root tear in anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees. Efficacy and safety of microendoscopic anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Compared with conventional open surgery. Intradiscal treatment with recombinant human MMP-7 for patients with lumbar disc herniation: A sham-controlled multicenter, single-blind, dose-escalation, single-dose, phase I/IIa study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1