Temporal associations between interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance in cognitive behavioral therapy.

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1037/pst0000566
Flavio Iovoli, Juan Martín Gómez Penedo, Wolfgang Lutz, Julian A Rubel
{"title":"Temporal associations between interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance in cognitive behavioral therapy.","authors":"Flavio Iovoli, Juan Martín Gómez Penedo, Wolfgang Lutz, Julian A Rubel","doi":"10.1037/pst0000566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interpersonal problems have been identified as a potential risk factor for a weaker therapeutic alliance during psychotherapy, yet their temporal relationship and underlying dynamics remain unclear. To address this, the present study explores these associations during the first 20 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy. The data from 2,123 patients undergoing treatment in an outpatient clinic were analyzed. Interpersonal problems were assessed every fifth session with the 12-item version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-12, while therapeutic alliance was measured after every session with the Session Rating Scale. Temporal associations were modeled using both a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model and an autoregressive latent trajectory model with structured residuals, as they allow the differentiation of within- and between-patient components. The random-intercept cross-lagged panel model produced more reliable and interpretable estimates. At the within-patient level, contemporaneous associations were significant, indicating that higher-than-usual interpersonal problems within a session were associated with lower-than-usual experienced therapeutic alliance at the same time point (β = -.067 to -.074, <i>p</i> = .005). Over time, higher-than-usual interpersonal problems negatively influenced therapeutic alliance at the next assessment (β = -.052 to -.063, <i>p</i> = .032), while higher-than-usual therapeutic alliance predicted reductions in interpersonal problems five sessions later (β = -.051 to -.083, <i>p</i> = .002). These findings suggest a reciprocal dynamic between interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance, where improvements in one construct are associated with beneficial changes in the other over time, highlighting the importance of addressing interpersonal difficulties to strengthen the therapeutic alliance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000566","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpersonal problems have been identified as a potential risk factor for a weaker therapeutic alliance during psychotherapy, yet their temporal relationship and underlying dynamics remain unclear. To address this, the present study explores these associations during the first 20 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy. The data from 2,123 patients undergoing treatment in an outpatient clinic were analyzed. Interpersonal problems were assessed every fifth session with the 12-item version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-12, while therapeutic alliance was measured after every session with the Session Rating Scale. Temporal associations were modeled using both a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model and an autoregressive latent trajectory model with structured residuals, as they allow the differentiation of within- and between-patient components. The random-intercept cross-lagged panel model produced more reliable and interpretable estimates. At the within-patient level, contemporaneous associations were significant, indicating that higher-than-usual interpersonal problems within a session were associated with lower-than-usual experienced therapeutic alliance at the same time point (β = -.067 to -.074, p = .005). Over time, higher-than-usual interpersonal problems negatively influenced therapeutic alliance at the next assessment (β = -.052 to -.063, p = .032), while higher-than-usual therapeutic alliance predicted reductions in interpersonal problems five sessions later (β = -.051 to -.083, p = .002). These findings suggest a reciprocal dynamic between interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance, where improvements in one construct are associated with beneficial changes in the other over time, highlighting the importance of addressing interpersonal difficulties to strengthen the therapeutic alliance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
期刊最新文献
Temporal associations between interpersonal problems and therapeutic alliance in cognitive behavioral therapy. Development of an artificial intelligence-based measure of therapists' skills: A multimodal proof of concept. Leveraging natural language processing to enhance feedback-informed group therapy: A proof of concept. Therapist affect focus and patient outcomes in psychodynamic therapy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Preliminary investigation of an artificial intelligence-based cognitive behavioral therapy training tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1