Jian Li, Bing Yang, Lei Guo, Wenqi Huang, Qiong Hu, Hongting Yan, Changpu Du, Rong Tan, Dongxin Tang
{"title":"SFRP2 mediates Epstein-Barr virus and bladder cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization study and colocalization analysis.","authors":"Jian Li, Bing Yang, Lei Guo, Wenqi Huang, Qiong Hu, Hongting Yan, Changpu Du, Rong Tan, Dongxin Tang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-91594-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies suggest a possible association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and bladder cancer (BCa) risk, though this remains unclear. Secreted frizzled-related protein (sFRP) is also linked to BCa, with some DNA viruses potentially regulating its expression. This study used Mendelian randomization (MR) and colocalization analysis to explore the causal relationship between EBV infection, BCa risk, and the mediating role of sFRP. We first performed a two-sample MR study to assess the causal relationship between 5 EBV-related antibodies (AEB-IgG, EA-D, EBNA-1, VCA-p18, ZEBRA) and BCa using the Finnish Consortium's R11 dataset, validated with R10. Reverse MR analysis followed. For significant results, multivariable MR (MVMR) was applied to adjust for confounding risk factors. A two-step MR explored the potential mediating role of 3 sFRPs (sFRP1, sFRP2, sFRP3) between positive exposures and BCa. Colocalization analysis were conducted for positive exposures, mediators, and BCa, with multiple sensitivity analyses confirming the robustness of the results. The two-sample Mendelian randomization study found that EBNA-1 (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01-1.30; p = 0.039) and VCA-p18 (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13-1.64; p = 0.001) may increase BCa risk, with only VCA-p18 (P_fdr = 0.006) showing a significant effect after False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction. The Finnish Consortium R10 replication study yielded similar results, and reverse MR analysis did not suggest reverse causality. After MVMR adjusted for relevant confounders, VCA-p18 (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.13-1.74; p = 0.002) still significantly increased BCa risk. Two-step MR identified sFRP2 as a mediator, with VCA-p18 down-regulating sFRP2 expression to elevate BCa risk. Colocalization analysis suggested a shared causal variant (nearby gene HLA-DQA1) between VCA-p18 and BCa (PPH4 = 65.44%). Multiple sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Our study suggests that EBV infection (VCA-p18 antibody) may increase the risk of BCa by lowering sFRP2 levels. Additionally, EBNA-1 antibodies may also contribute to an elevated risk of BCa. We hope these findings will provide new insights for future research on the association between EBV and BCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"7118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11868617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91594-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Studies suggest a possible association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and bladder cancer (BCa) risk, though this remains unclear. Secreted frizzled-related protein (sFRP) is also linked to BCa, with some DNA viruses potentially regulating its expression. This study used Mendelian randomization (MR) and colocalization analysis to explore the causal relationship between EBV infection, BCa risk, and the mediating role of sFRP. We first performed a two-sample MR study to assess the causal relationship between 5 EBV-related antibodies (AEB-IgG, EA-D, EBNA-1, VCA-p18, ZEBRA) and BCa using the Finnish Consortium's R11 dataset, validated with R10. Reverse MR analysis followed. For significant results, multivariable MR (MVMR) was applied to adjust for confounding risk factors. A two-step MR explored the potential mediating role of 3 sFRPs (sFRP1, sFRP2, sFRP3) between positive exposures and BCa. Colocalization analysis were conducted for positive exposures, mediators, and BCa, with multiple sensitivity analyses confirming the robustness of the results. The two-sample Mendelian randomization study found that EBNA-1 (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01-1.30; p = 0.039) and VCA-p18 (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13-1.64; p = 0.001) may increase BCa risk, with only VCA-p18 (P_fdr = 0.006) showing a significant effect after False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction. The Finnish Consortium R10 replication study yielded similar results, and reverse MR analysis did not suggest reverse causality. After MVMR adjusted for relevant confounders, VCA-p18 (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.13-1.74; p = 0.002) still significantly increased BCa risk. Two-step MR identified sFRP2 as a mediator, with VCA-p18 down-regulating sFRP2 expression to elevate BCa risk. Colocalization analysis suggested a shared causal variant (nearby gene HLA-DQA1) between VCA-p18 and BCa (PPH4 = 65.44%). Multiple sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Our study suggests that EBV infection (VCA-p18 antibody) may increase the risk of BCa by lowering sFRP2 levels. Additionally, EBNA-1 antibodies may also contribute to an elevated risk of BCa. We hope these findings will provide new insights for future research on the association between EBV and BCa.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.