Optimizing Wound Culture Ordering in Electronic Health Records: A Case Report.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1055/a-2546-5868
John J Hanna, Jenny L Weon, Kathryn Kelton, Ellis Haskell, Mary J Ramirez, Bonnie Greene, Marcus Kouma, Donald F Storey, Shelby D Melton, Toby Gray, William Scott, Rafael Ortiz-Colberg, David Truong, James Blaine, Richard J Medford, Christoph U Lehmann, Bishnu Devkota, Jeffrey Hastings
{"title":"Optimizing Wound Culture Ordering in Electronic Health Records: A Case Report.","authors":"John J Hanna, Jenny L Weon, Kathryn Kelton, Ellis Haskell, Mary J Ramirez, Bonnie Greene, Marcus Kouma, Donald F Storey, Shelby D Melton, Toby Gray, William Scott, Rafael Ortiz-Colberg, David Truong, James Blaine, Richard J Medford, Christoph U Lehmann, Bishnu Devkota, Jeffrey Hastings","doi":"10.1055/a-2546-5868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At a large quaternary health system, tissue specimens were frequently sent to the microbiology laboratory with an incorrect wound culture order meant for swab specimens due to poor electronic health record (EHR) menu design. Wound cultures were also requested in chronic wound cases with a low index of suspicion for acute infection.This study aimed to present a case report on specific changes to the design of the electronic test menu that resulted in higher numbers of appropriate ordering practices.\"Wound Culture\" test was renamed to \"Wound Swab Culture\" to distinguish it from tissue specimens, and \"Tissue Culture\" was added as a new available quick order in the microbiology menu alongside the existing wound culture quick order. In addition, a diagnostic questionnaire was added to \"Wound Swab Culture\" quick orders that inquired about the presence of pus/exudate and erythema and if the wound was a surgical wound to guide and assess the appropriateness of the culture order.The number of tissue specimens erroneously submitted with a wound culture order decreased from 6.6% in July 2022 (preintervention) to 0% in July 2023 (postintervention). The diagnostic questionnaire was utilized in 27.5% of wound culture orders. In 6 out of 98 orders (6.1%), the wound was not surgical, and there was an absence of pus/exudate and erythema (<i>p</i> = 0.038). Conversely, 92 out of 98 orders (93.9%) had at least one \"Yes\" response. The total numbers of tests 6 months before and after the test menu design interventions showed that tissue culture orders increased from 228 prior to the intervention to 349 postintervention. Wound culture orders decreased from 575 to 460 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).Our case report underscores how targeted EHR optimization can be associated with more appropriate microbiology test ordering practices for potential wound infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"569-574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2546-5868","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At a large quaternary health system, tissue specimens were frequently sent to the microbiology laboratory with an incorrect wound culture order meant for swab specimens due to poor electronic health record (EHR) menu design. Wound cultures were also requested in chronic wound cases with a low index of suspicion for acute infection.This study aimed to present a case report on specific changes to the design of the electronic test menu that resulted in higher numbers of appropriate ordering practices."Wound Culture" test was renamed to "Wound Swab Culture" to distinguish it from tissue specimens, and "Tissue Culture" was added as a new available quick order in the microbiology menu alongside the existing wound culture quick order. In addition, a diagnostic questionnaire was added to "Wound Swab Culture" quick orders that inquired about the presence of pus/exudate and erythema and if the wound was a surgical wound to guide and assess the appropriateness of the culture order.The number of tissue specimens erroneously submitted with a wound culture order decreased from 6.6% in July 2022 (preintervention) to 0% in July 2023 (postintervention). The diagnostic questionnaire was utilized in 27.5% of wound culture orders. In 6 out of 98 orders (6.1%), the wound was not surgical, and there was an absence of pus/exudate and erythema (p = 0.038). Conversely, 92 out of 98 orders (93.9%) had at least one "Yes" response. The total numbers of tests 6 months before and after the test menu design interventions showed that tissue culture orders increased from 228 prior to the intervention to 349 postintervention. Wound culture orders decreased from 575 to 460 (p < 0.0001).Our case report underscores how targeted EHR optimization can be associated with more appropriate microbiology test ordering practices for potential wound infections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在电子健康记录中优化伤口培养排序:一个案例报告。
背景:在一家大型四级医疗系统中,由于电子健康记录菜单设计不当,组织标本经常被错误地发送到微生物实验室,而伤口培养订单本应是拭子标本。对于急性感染可疑指数较低的慢性伤口病例,也要求进行伤口培养:提交一份病例报告,说明对电子检验菜单设计的具体修改,从而提高了正确下单的数量:方法:将 "伤口培养 "检验更名为 "伤口拭子培养",以区别于组织标本,并在微生物学菜单中新增 "组织培养 "快速订单,与现有的伤口培养快速订单并列。此外,还在 "伤口拭子培养 "快速订单中添加了诊断问卷,询问是否存在脓液/渗出物和红斑,以及伤口是否为手术伤口,以指导和评估培养订单的适当性:结果:错误提交伤口培养单的组织标本数量从 2022 年 7 月(干预前)的 6.6% 降至 2023 年 7 月(干预后)的 0%。27.5%的伤口培养订单使用了诊断问卷。在 98 份订单中,有 6 份(6.1%)的伤口未进行手术,没有脓液/渗出物和红斑(p = 0.038)。相反,98 份医嘱中有 92 份(93.9%)至少有一个回答为 "是"。检测菜单设计干预前后六个月的检测总数显示,组织培养订单从干预前的 228 份增加到干预后的 349 份。伤口培养订单从 575 份减少到 460 份(p < 0.0001):我们的病例报告强调了有针对性的电子健康记录优化如何与针对潜在伤口感染的更适当微生物检验订单实践相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Industry Electives in Clinical Informatics Fellowship: Early Experiences from a Multi-Institution Survey. Crossover Evaluation of Two Ambient AI Scribe Tools in the Emergency Department. Evaluation of ChatGPT and Gemini in Answering Patient Questions after Gynecologic Surgery. Leveraging 10 Days of Alert Malfunction to Improve Mature Organizational Clinical Decision Support Processes. EHR Workflows Contribute to Disparities by Language Preference in Parent Patient Portal Access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1