Dependent and independent sampling techniques for modeling radiation and failure data

IF 1.7 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101377
Fatimah A. Almulhim , Dalia Kamal Alnagar , ELsiddig Idriss Mohamed , Nuran M. Hassan
{"title":"Dependent and independent sampling techniques for modeling radiation and failure data","authors":"Fatimah A. Almulhim ,&nbsp;Dalia Kamal Alnagar ,&nbsp;ELsiddig Idriss Mohamed ,&nbsp;Nuran M. Hassan","doi":"10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ordered set sampling techniques are among the most popular current techniques used in estimation, especially for small sample sizes, and their efficiency has been proven in many articles as the best estimators for unknown parameters for several distributions. Systematic ranked set sampling and centralized ranked set sampling are two recently developed techniques in ranked set sampling that fall under dependent sampling techniques. The probability density function for each using the inverse Lomax distribution is extracted. Furthermore, the maximum likelihood method is used to estimate the values of the Inverse Lomax distribution parameters using several ordered set sampling techniques. Several of these techniques are new and have not been used in various distributions. There are two types of ranked set sampling techniques that were used: independent set sampling includes ranked set sampling (RSS), and dependent set sampling includes neoteric ranked set sampling (NRSS), extended neoteric ranked set sampling (ENRSS), systematic ranked set sampling (SRSS), and centralized ranked set sampling (CRSS) In the Monto Carlo simulation with varying sample sizes, the NRSS, ENRSS, SRSS, and CRSS estimators outperformed the RSS estimator. Additionally, the ENRSS method is more effective than competing RSS-based techniques. It has also been demonstrated that CRSS is not as effective as other techniques, particularly for large mean square errors. Finally, two real datasets related to radiation and failure rate show how the distribution can change depending on the sampling techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","volume":"18 2","pages":"Article 101377"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850725000895","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ordered set sampling techniques are among the most popular current techniques used in estimation, especially for small sample sizes, and their efficiency has been proven in many articles as the best estimators for unknown parameters for several distributions. Systematic ranked set sampling and centralized ranked set sampling are two recently developed techniques in ranked set sampling that fall under dependent sampling techniques. The probability density function for each using the inverse Lomax distribution is extracted. Furthermore, the maximum likelihood method is used to estimate the values of the Inverse Lomax distribution parameters using several ordered set sampling techniques. Several of these techniques are new and have not been used in various distributions. There are two types of ranked set sampling techniques that were used: independent set sampling includes ranked set sampling (RSS), and dependent set sampling includes neoteric ranked set sampling (NRSS), extended neoteric ranked set sampling (ENRSS), systematic ranked set sampling (SRSS), and centralized ranked set sampling (CRSS) In the Monto Carlo simulation with varying sample sizes, the NRSS, ENRSS, SRSS, and CRSS estimators outperformed the RSS estimator. Additionally, the ENRSS method is more effective than competing RSS-based techniques. It has also been demonstrated that CRSS is not as effective as other techniques, particularly for large mean square errors. Finally, two real datasets related to radiation and failure rate show how the distribution can change depending on the sampling techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辐射和故障数据建模的依赖和独立采样技术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and applications of nuclear, radiation and isotopes in biology, medicine, drugs, biochemistry, microbiology, agriculture, entomology, food technology, chemistry, physics, solid states, engineering, environmental and applied sciences.
期刊最新文献
Thermally radiative flow of non-Newtonian Rabinowitsch fluid through a permeable artery with multiple stenoses of varying shapes Applications to medical and failure time data: Using a new extension of the extended exponential model Assessment of radiobiological impacts of threshold doses of alpha particles on A549 human lung cancer cells following direct irradiation exposure Irreversibility analysis and thermal performance of quadratic radiation and Darcy-Forchheimer flow over non-isothermal needle with velocity slip: Effects of aggregation and non-aggregation dynamics Robust estimator for estimation of population mean under PPS sampling: Application to radiation data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1