Protein powders, painkillers, and pleasure: Reasons for exercise and the use of dietary supplements and analgesics among recreational half-marathoners

IF 3.7 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Performance enhancement and health Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.peh.2025.100332
Remco C. Havermans , Jos L.M.L. le Noble , Ilse van Lier
{"title":"Protein powders, painkillers, and pleasure: Reasons for exercise and the use of dietary supplements and analgesics among recreational half-marathoners","authors":"Remco C. Havermans ,&nbsp;Jos L.M.L. le Noble ,&nbsp;Ilse van Lier","doi":"10.1016/j.peh.2025.100332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The primary aim of the current study was to explore associations between reasons for running exercise and the use of nutritional supplements and analgesics among recreational half-marathoners. In a sample of 80 participants of the Venloop half marathon public running event, we determined the most important reason(s) for running exercise and assessed whether that reason is correlated with the use of analgesics and/or supplements. Further, we hypothesized that the degree of supplement use predicts the use of analgesics with running exercise. The most prominent reason for running was enjoyment and that did not correlate with either analgesic or supplement use. Overall supplement use incidence was high (93 %) but degree of supplement use did not predict the use of analgesics with exercise. We conclude that the widespread use of supplements is not analogous to using analgesics before/during a run. Nonetheless, recreational runners would benefit from more evidence-based information on safe and sensible use of both supplements and analgesics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19886,"journal":{"name":"Performance enhancement and health","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100332"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance enhancement and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211266925000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary aim of the current study was to explore associations between reasons for running exercise and the use of nutritional supplements and analgesics among recreational half-marathoners. In a sample of 80 participants of the Venloop half marathon public running event, we determined the most important reason(s) for running exercise and assessed whether that reason is correlated with the use of analgesics and/or supplements. Further, we hypothesized that the degree of supplement use predicts the use of analgesics with running exercise. The most prominent reason for running was enjoyment and that did not correlate with either analgesic or supplement use. Overall supplement use incidence was high (93 %) but degree of supplement use did not predict the use of analgesics with exercise. We conclude that the widespread use of supplements is not analogous to using analgesics before/during a run. Nonetheless, recreational runners would benefit from more evidence-based information on safe and sensible use of both supplements and analgesics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蛋白粉、止痛药和快乐:半程马拉松运动员运动和使用膳食补充剂和止痛药的原因
当前研究的主要目的是探索娱乐性半程马拉松运动员进行跑步运动的原因与营养补充剂和止痛药的使用之间的联系。在Venloop半程马拉松公共跑步活动的80名参与者的样本中,我们确定了跑步锻炼的最重要原因,并评估了这个原因是否与使用止痛药和/或补充剂有关。此外,我们假设补充使用的程度预测了镇痛药与跑步运动的使用。跑步最主要的原因是享受,这与止痛剂或补品的使用无关。总的补充剂使用发生率很高(93%),但补充剂使用程度并不能预测运动中止痛药的使用。我们的结论是,补充剂的广泛使用与在跑步前或跑步中使用止痛药不同。尽管如此,休闲跑步者将受益于更多关于安全、合理使用补充剂和止痛药的循证信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Performance enhancement and health
Performance enhancement and health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Performance, perception, and policy: Rethinking erythropoietin and the ethics of anti-doping Exploring daily affect, affect regulation and goal pursuit in a physical activity intervention: Effects of a cognitive and cognitive-affective physical activity intervention Impact of concussion on rugby players’ physical attributes and risk of re-injury: A scoping review Effective decision-making or affective? Affective learning design in sport officials’ training The case against performance framing of mental healthcare in elite sport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1