Enablers and barriers to implementing effective disaster risk management according to good governance principles: Lessons from Central Vietnam

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105344
Bien Thanh Vu , Olabisi S. Obaitor , Lena C. Grobusch , Dominic Sett , Michael Hagenlocher , Ulrike Schinkel , Linh Khanh Hoang Nguyen , Felix Bachofer , Son Thanh Ngo , Matthias Garschagen
{"title":"Enablers and barriers to implementing effective disaster risk management according to good governance principles: Lessons from Central Vietnam","authors":"Bien Thanh Vu ,&nbsp;Olabisi S. Obaitor ,&nbsp;Lena C. Grobusch ,&nbsp;Dominic Sett ,&nbsp;Michael Hagenlocher ,&nbsp;Ulrike Schinkel ,&nbsp;Linh Khanh Hoang Nguyen ,&nbsp;Felix Bachofer ,&nbsp;Son Thanh Ngo ,&nbsp;Matthias Garschagen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the increasing frequency and intensity of natural hazard-induced disasters, global disaster risk governance predominantly focuses on theoretical frameworks and broad policies, with a noticeable gap in the effective local implementation of strategies grounded in good governance principles. This research aims to address this gap by evaluating the alignment of local disaster risk management policies with key good governance principles including: accountability, collaboration, transparency, information sharing, decentralization and autonomy, responsiveness and flexibility. Using Thua Thien Hue province in Central Vietnam, a region highly vulnerable to natural hazards, as a case study, this research combines legal document analysis and expert interviews to assess both enablers and barriers in disaster risk management. The findings identify several enablers, including clear legal frameworks, public transparency in resource allocation, active multi-stakeholder collaboration, and localized governance approaches that empower community involvement. However, persistent barriers include accountability gaps due to the lack of enforceable sanctions and incentives for proactive disaster prevention. Collaborative efforts remain predominantly government-led, with limited engagement from the private sector. Challenges in information sharing arise from insufficient dissemination of risk maps and hazard assessments at the community level. Decentralization and autonomy efforts struggle with personnel shortages and inadequate training. Responsiveness and flexibility suffer from the failure to adequately integrate vulnerability scenarios into legal frameworks. These findings highlight the importance of addressing barriers while leveraging existing enablers to strengthen governance frameworks in hazard-prone regions, providing valuable lessons that can be adapted to other disaster-prone areas globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 105344"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925001682","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the increasing frequency and intensity of natural hazard-induced disasters, global disaster risk governance predominantly focuses on theoretical frameworks and broad policies, with a noticeable gap in the effective local implementation of strategies grounded in good governance principles. This research aims to address this gap by evaluating the alignment of local disaster risk management policies with key good governance principles including: accountability, collaboration, transparency, information sharing, decentralization and autonomy, responsiveness and flexibility. Using Thua Thien Hue province in Central Vietnam, a region highly vulnerable to natural hazards, as a case study, this research combines legal document analysis and expert interviews to assess both enablers and barriers in disaster risk management. The findings identify several enablers, including clear legal frameworks, public transparency in resource allocation, active multi-stakeholder collaboration, and localized governance approaches that empower community involvement. However, persistent barriers include accountability gaps due to the lack of enforceable sanctions and incentives for proactive disaster prevention. Collaborative efforts remain predominantly government-led, with limited engagement from the private sector. Challenges in information sharing arise from insufficient dissemination of risk maps and hazard assessments at the community level. Decentralization and autonomy efforts struggle with personnel shortages and inadequate training. Responsiveness and flexibility suffer from the failure to adequately integrate vulnerability scenarios into legal frameworks. These findings highlight the importance of addressing barriers while leveraging existing enablers to strengthen governance frameworks in hazard-prone regions, providing valuable lessons that can be adapted to other disaster-prone areas globally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据善治原则实施有效灾害风险管理的有利因素和障碍:越南中部的经验教训
尽管自然灾害的频率和强度不断增加,但全球灾害风险治理主要侧重于理论框架和广泛的政策,在有效实施基于善治原则的战略方面存在明显差距。本研究旨在通过评估地方灾害风险管理政策与关键善治原则的一致性来解决这一差距,这些原则包括:问责制、协作、透明度、信息共享、权力下放和自治、响应能力和灵活性。本研究以越南中部极易遭受自然灾害的化天顺化省为例,结合法律文件分析和专家访谈来评估灾害风险管理的促进因素和障碍。研究结果确定了若干推动因素,包括明确的法律框架、资源分配的公共透明度、多方利益相关者的积极合作以及促进社区参与的本地化治理方法。然而,持续存在的障碍包括问责制的差距,这是由于缺乏可执行的制裁和激励措施来积极预防灾害。合作努力仍然主要由政府主导,私营部门的参与有限。信息共享方面的挑战是由于在社区一级没有充分传播风险图和危害评估。权力下放和自治努力与人员短缺和培训不足作斗争。响应性和灵活性因未能将脆弱性情景充分整合到法律框架中而受到影响。这些发现强调了解决障碍的重要性,同时利用现有的促进因素加强易发灾害地区的治理框架,提供可适用于全球其他易发灾害地区的宝贵经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Where do evacuees go? Understanding evacuation destinations in Georgia during Hurricane Milton The influence of builders on seismic strengthening of housing Efficacy of prompt evacuation and route selection for tsunamis considering building collapse: A case study of the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake Influence of modeling assumptions on pedestrian evacuation success for non-eruptive lahar hazards at Mount Rainier, Washington A new multidimensional framework for risk assessment in multi-hazard context: the Hazards-Impacts matrix
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1