Sanitation Interventions for Reducing Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella on Canvas and Cordura® Harvest Bags.

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of food protection Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100472
Cyril A Etaka, Daniel L Weller, Alexis M Hamilton, Faith Critzer, Laura K Strawn
{"title":"Sanitation Interventions for Reducing Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella on Canvas and Cordura® Harvest Bags.","authors":"Cyril A Etaka, Daniel L Weller, Alexis M Hamilton, Faith Critzer, Laura K Strawn","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Food contact surfaces, including harvest bags, are potential vectors for cross-contamination in produce operations, yet recommendations for their sanitation are limited. This study evaluated the efficacy of wet- and dry-based sanitizers in reducing Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella on two harvest bag materials, canvas, and Cordura®. Coupons (25cm<sup>2</sup>) were inoculated with 5-strain cocktails of L. monocytogenes or Salmonella (∼7 log CFU/coupon) before treatment. Treatments included chlorine (200 ppm; pH 7), peroxyacetic acid (PAA; 200 ppm), isopropyl alcohol with quaternary ammonium compounds (IPAQuats; ready-to-use), steam, and water. Sanitizers were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions for a 1-minute contact time. After treatment, pathogen concentrations were enumerated on selective (Modified Oxford, Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate) and non-selective (Tryptic Soy Agar) media. Duplicate experiments were conducted with five replicates per treatment (n=10) and pathogen reductions were evaluated using log-linear mixed-effects models. IPAQuats observed the highest reductions with L. monocytogenes reductions of 5.16±0.93 log CFU/coupon and 6.01±0.49 log CFU/coupon, and Salmonella reductions of 4.61 ± 1.03 log CFU/coupon and 5.90 ± 0.57 log CFU/coupon on canvas and Cordura®, respectively. PAA resulted in L. monocytogenes reductions of 2.63±0.56 and 3.92±0.81 log CFU/coupon and Salmonella reductions of 3.68±0.79 and 3.21±1.14 log CFU/coupon on canvas and Cordura®, respectively. Chlorine and steam were less effective with reductions of <3 log CFU/coupon for both pathogens and materials. While no difference in L. monocytogenes reduction was observed between materials by treatment, Salmonella reductions on Cordura® were significantly higher than reductions on canvas after treatments with IPAQuats (1.62 log CFU/coupon; 95% CI=1.19, 2.05) and steam (0.84 log CFU/coupon; 95% CI=0.42, 1.28). Results provide recommendations for produce growers on effective sanitation of harvest bags.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food contact surfaces, including harvest bags, are potential vectors for cross-contamination in produce operations, yet recommendations for their sanitation are limited. This study evaluated the efficacy of wet- and dry-based sanitizers in reducing Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella on two harvest bag materials, canvas, and Cordura®. Coupons (25cm2) were inoculated with 5-strain cocktails of L. monocytogenes or Salmonella (∼7 log CFU/coupon) before treatment. Treatments included chlorine (200 ppm; pH 7), peroxyacetic acid (PAA; 200 ppm), isopropyl alcohol with quaternary ammonium compounds (IPAQuats; ready-to-use), steam, and water. Sanitizers were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions for a 1-minute contact time. After treatment, pathogen concentrations were enumerated on selective (Modified Oxford, Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate) and non-selective (Tryptic Soy Agar) media. Duplicate experiments were conducted with five replicates per treatment (n=10) and pathogen reductions were evaluated using log-linear mixed-effects models. IPAQuats observed the highest reductions with L. monocytogenes reductions of 5.16±0.93 log CFU/coupon and 6.01±0.49 log CFU/coupon, and Salmonella reductions of 4.61 ± 1.03 log CFU/coupon and 5.90 ± 0.57 log CFU/coupon on canvas and Cordura®, respectively. PAA resulted in L. monocytogenes reductions of 2.63±0.56 and 3.92±0.81 log CFU/coupon and Salmonella reductions of 3.68±0.79 and 3.21±1.14 log CFU/coupon on canvas and Cordura®, respectively. Chlorine and steam were less effective with reductions of <3 log CFU/coupon for both pathogens and materials. While no difference in L. monocytogenes reduction was observed between materials by treatment, Salmonella reductions on Cordura® were significantly higher than reductions on canvas after treatments with IPAQuats (1.62 log CFU/coupon; 95% CI=1.19, 2.05) and steam (0.84 log CFU/coupon; 95% CI=0.42, 1.28). Results provide recommendations for produce growers on effective sanitation of harvest bags.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包括采摘袋在内的食品接触表面是农产品生产过程中交叉污染的潜在媒介,但对其进行消毒的建议却很有限。本研究评估了湿基和干基消毒剂在两种收获袋材料(帆布和 Cordura®)上减少李斯特菌和沙门氏菌的效果。在处理前,将单核细胞增生李斯特氏菌或沙门氏菌的 5 株混合菌株(∼7 log CFU/coupon)接种到小袋(25cm2)上。处理方法包括氯(200 ppm;pH 7)、过氧乙酸(PAA;200 ppm)、含季铵化合物的异丙醇(IPAQuats;即用型)、蒸汽和水。消毒剂按照制造商的说明使用,接触时间为 1 分钟。处理后,在选择性(改良牛津、木糖赖氨酸脱氧胆酸盐)和非选择性(胰蛋白酶大豆琼脂)培养基上对病原体浓度进行计数。每种处理进行 5 次重复实验(n=10),并使用对数线性混合效应模型评估病原体的减少情况。IPAQuats 的单核细胞增生症菌落减少率最高,分别为 5.16±0.93 log CFU/coupon 和 6.01±0.49 log CFU/coupon,沙门氏菌在帆布和 Cordura® 上的减少率分别为 4.61 ± 1.03 log CFU/coupon 和 5.90 ± 0.57 log CFU/coupon。PAA 可使帆布和 Cordura® 上的单核细胞增多症菌落总数分别减少 2.63±0.56 和 3.92±0.81 log CFU/coupon,沙门氏菌分别减少 3.68±0.79 和 3.21±1.14 log CFU/coupon。氯气和蒸汽的效果较差,分别减少了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
期刊最新文献
Exploration of shrimp and their environments for the detection of antibiotic resistance genes of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and spectrophotometry of shrimp muscles for heavy metals and their human health risk assessment in Bangladesh. Inactivation Kinetics of Alicylobacillus acidoterrestris Spores and Determination of Spore Germicidal Fluences Under UV-C Treatment. A Systematic Review on Preharvest Interventions Used to Control Salmonella in Poultry Rearing in the United States. Sanitation Interventions for Reducing Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella on Canvas and Cordura® Harvest Bags. Impact of Material Type and Relative Humidity on the Survival of E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella enterica on Harvest Bags.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1