Enhanced object detection in remote sensing images by applying metaheuristic and hybrid metaheuristic optimizers to YOLOv7 and YOLOv8.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Scientific Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-89124-8
Khaled Mohammed Elgamily, M A Mohamed, Ahmed Mohamed Abou-Taleb, Mohamed Maher Ata
{"title":"Enhanced object detection in remote sensing images by applying metaheuristic and hybrid metaheuristic optimizers to YOLOv7 and YOLOv8.","authors":"Khaled Mohammed Elgamily, M A Mohamed, Ahmed Mohamed Abou-Taleb, Mohamed Maher Ata","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-89124-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Developments in object detection algorithms are critical for urban planning, environmental monitoring, surveillance, and many other applications. The primary objective of the article was to improve detection precision and model efficiency. The paper compared the performance of six different metaheuristic optimization algorithms including Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Remora Optimization Algorithm (ROA), Aquila Optimizer (AO), and Hybrid PSO-GWO (HPSGWO) combined with YOLOv7 and YOLOv8. The study included two distinct remote sensing datasets, RSOD and VHR-10. Many performance measures as precision, recall, and mean average precision (mAP) were used during the training, validation, and testing processes, as well as the fit score. The results show significant improvements in both YOLO variants following optimization using these strategies. The GWO-optimized YOLOv7 with 0.96 mAP 50, and 0.69 mAP 50:95, and the HPSGWO-optimized YOLOv8 with 0.97 mAP 50, and 0.72 mAP 50:95 had the best performance in the RSOD dataset. Similarly, the GWO-optimized versions of YOLOv7 and YOLOv8 had the best performance on the VHR-10 dataset with 0.87 mAP 50, and 0.58 mAP 50:95 for YOLOv7 and with 0.99 mAP 50, and 0.69 mAP 50:95 for YOLOv8, indicating greater performance. The findings supported the usefulness of metaheuristic optimization in increasing the precision and recall rates of YOLO algorithms and demonstrated major significance in improving object recognition tasks in remote sensing imaging, opening up a viable route for applications in a variety of disciplines.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"7226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89124-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developments in object detection algorithms are critical for urban planning, environmental monitoring, surveillance, and many other applications. The primary objective of the article was to improve detection precision and model efficiency. The paper compared the performance of six different metaheuristic optimization algorithms including Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Remora Optimization Algorithm (ROA), Aquila Optimizer (AO), and Hybrid PSO-GWO (HPSGWO) combined with YOLOv7 and YOLOv8. The study included two distinct remote sensing datasets, RSOD and VHR-10. Many performance measures as precision, recall, and mean average precision (mAP) were used during the training, validation, and testing processes, as well as the fit score. The results show significant improvements in both YOLO variants following optimization using these strategies. The GWO-optimized YOLOv7 with 0.96 mAP 50, and 0.69 mAP 50:95, and the HPSGWO-optimized YOLOv8 with 0.97 mAP 50, and 0.72 mAP 50:95 had the best performance in the RSOD dataset. Similarly, the GWO-optimized versions of YOLOv7 and YOLOv8 had the best performance on the VHR-10 dataset with 0.87 mAP 50, and 0.58 mAP 50:95 for YOLOv7 and with 0.99 mAP 50, and 0.69 mAP 50:95 for YOLOv8, indicating greater performance. The findings supported the usefulness of metaheuristic optimization in increasing the precision and recall rates of YOLO algorithms and demonstrated major significance in improving object recognition tasks in remote sensing imaging, opening up a viable route for applications in a variety of disciplines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 YOLOv7 和 YOLOv8 中应用元启发式和混合元启发式优化器增强遥感图像中的目标检测。
目标检测算法的发展对城市规划、环境监测、监视和许多其他应用至关重要。本文的主要目的是提高检测精度和模型效率。本文比较了灰狼优化算法(GWO)、粒子群优化算法(PSO)、遗传算法(GA)、Remora优化算法(ROA)、Aquila优化算法(AO)以及混合PSO-GWO (HPSGWO)结合YOLOv7和YOLOv8等6种元启发式优化算法的性能。该研究包括两个不同的遥感数据集,RSOD和VHR-10。在训练、验证和测试过程中使用了许多性能度量,如精度、召回率和平均精度(mAP),以及拟合分数。结果显示,在使用这些策略进行优化后,两种YOLO变体都有显著改善。在RSOD数据集中,gwo优化的YOLOv7 (0.96 mAP 50, 0.69 mAP 50:95)和hpsgwo优化的YOLOv8 (0.97 mAP 50, 0.72 mAP 50:95)的性能最好。同样,gwo优化版本的YOLOv7和YOLOv8在VHR-10数据集上的性能最好,分别为0.87 mAP 50和0.58 mAP 50:95, YOLOv7和0.99 mAP 50和0.69 mAP 50:95,表明性能更好。研究结果支持了元启发式优化在提高YOLO算法的准确率和召回率方面的有效性,并对改善遥感成像中的目标识别任务具有重要意义,为各种学科的应用开辟了一条可行的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
期刊最新文献
AI learning dependence and interpersonal incompetence in EFL contexts: The moderating role of ethical awareness. An improved sinh cosh optimizer for optimal scheduling of a microgrid with multi-energy resources and storage considering different weather conditions. Anticancer potential of radioactively activated zinc: mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Advancing early detection of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a Bayesian optimization approach to machine learning models. Advanced website fingerprinting for detecting VPN-based censorship evasion: a transformer-based approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1