Clinical Application of Intelligent Pain Management Program in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia Patients.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.014
Huaxiu Xu, Liyun Kong, Huichen Yang, Ting Huang, Fenfen Liu, Lili Zhang, Fei Zheng, Zhiyong Wu, Xulin Wang, Xinhong Zhang
{"title":"Clinical Application of Intelligent Pain Management Program in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia Patients.","authors":"Huaxiu Xu, Liyun Kong, Huichen Yang, Ting Huang, Fenfen Liu, Lili Zhang, Fei Zheng, Zhiyong Wu, Xulin Wang, Xinhong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective pain management is crucial for treating and caring for individuals with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). A systematic pain management program for this condition has not been established.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the clinical effectiveness of an intelligent pain management (IPM) program for patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling 92 PHN inpatients from January 2022 to January 2023. The control group (45 patients) received conventional pain management, while the experimental group (47 patients) underwent an IPM program. The study compared the impact of these approaches on clinical symptoms, sleep quality, and pain-catastrophizing cognition between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the experimental group, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores were, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores were significantly lower than those in the control group on the 7th and 10th days of hospitalization. The differences in NRS scores, both in terms of treatment effects and time effects, as well as the interaction effect between treatment and time, were statistically significant (p < .05). The experimental group also exhibited a lower average daily frequency of breakthrough pain, a higher total pain relief rate, and better sleep index scores compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences (p < .05). However, the pain catastrophizing scores in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPM programs can enhance patient pain outcomes and improve sleep quality. Nevertheless, the effect on pain catastrophizing cognition did not reach statistical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective pain management is crucial for treating and caring for individuals with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). A systematic pain management program for this condition has not been established.

Purpose: To assess the clinical effectiveness of an intelligent pain management (IPM) program for patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling 92 PHN inpatients from January 2022 to January 2023. The control group (45 patients) received conventional pain management, while the experimental group (47 patients) underwent an IPM program. The study compared the impact of these approaches on clinical symptoms, sleep quality, and pain-catastrophizing cognition between the two groups.

Results: In the experimental group, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores were, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores were significantly lower than those in the control group on the 7th and 10th days of hospitalization. The differences in NRS scores, both in terms of treatment effects and time effects, as well as the interaction effect between treatment and time, were statistically significant (p < .05). The experimental group also exhibited a lower average daily frequency of breakthrough pain, a higher total pain relief rate, and better sleep index scores compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences (p < .05). However, the pain catastrophizing scores in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: IPM programs can enhance patient pain outcomes and improve sleep quality. Nevertheless, the effect on pain catastrophizing cognition did not reach statistical significance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Application of Intelligent Pain Management Program in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia Patients. Effects of Ethnic Medicinal Plant Extracts Versus Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Menstrual Pain in Women With Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study. Romancing With Pain: A Survey Study of Young Adults With Chronic Pain. Impact of BMI and Work Environment Circumstances on Prevalence and Severity of Chronic Pain among Nurses. Pain Acceptance in Chronic Postoperative Pain: Concept Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1