A Scoping Review of Protective Factors That Contribute to Posttraumatic Wellbeing for Trauma-Exposed Military Service Members and Veterans.

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Trauma Violence & Abuse Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1177/15248380241309385
Marcela C Weber, Sheila Hanson, Brittany N Hampton, Travis N Ray, Rebecca Kitchens, Brandon J Griffin, Leah Tobey-Moore, Lauren Tong, Ellen P Fischer, Sherry Hamby, Michael A Cucciare, Natalie Hundt, Jeffrey M Pyne
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Protective Factors That Contribute to Posttraumatic Wellbeing for Trauma-Exposed Military Service Members and Veterans.","authors":"Marcela C Weber, Sheila Hanson, Brittany N Hampton, Travis N Ray, Rebecca Kitchens, Brandon J Griffin, Leah Tobey-Moore, Lauren Tong, Ellen P Fischer, Sherry Hamby, Michael A Cucciare, Natalie Hundt, Jeffrey M Pyne","doi":"10.1177/15248380241309385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Military service members experience higher levels of cumulative trauma than the general population, increasing their risk of mental health problems. This scoping review synthesizes evidence on protective factors that contribute to posttraumatic wellbeing among military service members and veterans. <i>PubMed</i> and <i>PsycINFO</i> databases were searched using keywords for military/veterans, traumatic event exposure, posttraumatic stress, and wellbeing outcomes (e.g., quality of life [QoL]). Article abstracts and full texts were screened by two reviewers, with a third reviewer resolving conflicts. Inclusion criteria consisted of the following: (a) empirical study, (b) military/veteran sample, (c) exposed to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criterion A event, (d) ≥1 protective factor examined, (e) ≥1 wellbeing outcome examined. After data extraction, Bibliometric Network Analysis was used to visualize the topics covered. Literature searches yielded 1,341 articles. Of these, 104 articles were retained after screening. Of the wellbeing outcomes studied, QoL, functioning, and posttraumatic growth were well-researched. Across intervention types (CBT-based, third wave, and complementary), some interventions were efficacious for wellbeing outcomes (mainly QoL), but many had negligible or nonsignificant effects. Other than social support, external resources, and systemic supports were understudied. Intensive interventions and those involving daily practice most effectively promoted wellbeing. Protective factors such as social support, executive functioning, optimism, and system-level resources should be better incorporated into PTSD care for service members/veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"26 2","pages":"235-250"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241309385","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Military service members experience higher levels of cumulative trauma than the general population, increasing their risk of mental health problems. This scoping review synthesizes evidence on protective factors that contribute to posttraumatic wellbeing among military service members and veterans. PubMed and PsycINFO databases were searched using keywords for military/veterans, traumatic event exposure, posttraumatic stress, and wellbeing outcomes (e.g., quality of life [QoL]). Article abstracts and full texts were screened by two reviewers, with a third reviewer resolving conflicts. Inclusion criteria consisted of the following: (a) empirical study, (b) military/veteran sample, (c) exposed to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criterion A event, (d) ≥1 protective factor examined, (e) ≥1 wellbeing outcome examined. After data extraction, Bibliometric Network Analysis was used to visualize the topics covered. Literature searches yielded 1,341 articles. Of these, 104 articles were retained after screening. Of the wellbeing outcomes studied, QoL, functioning, and posttraumatic growth were well-researched. Across intervention types (CBT-based, third wave, and complementary), some interventions were efficacious for wellbeing outcomes (mainly QoL), but many had negligible or nonsignificant effects. Other than social support, external resources, and systemic supports were understudied. Intensive interventions and those involving daily practice most effectively promoted wellbeing. Protective factors such as social support, executive functioning, optimism, and system-level resources should be better incorporated into PTSD care for service members/veterans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对有助于遭受创伤的现役军人和退伍军人创伤后福祉的保护性因素进行范围界定。
与普通人相比,军人经历的累积性创伤程度更高,从而增加了他们出现心理健康问题的风险。本范围界定综述综述了有助于军人和退伍军人创伤后健康的保护性因素的相关证据。使用军人/退伍军人、创伤事件暴露、创伤后应激和健康结果(如生活质量 [QoL])等关键词对 PubMed 和 PsycINFO 数据库进行了检索。文章摘要和全文由两名审稿人筛选,第三名审稿人负责解决冲突。纳入标准包括以下内容:(a) 实证研究,(b) 军队/退伍军人样本,(c) 暴露于创伤后应激障碍 (PTSD) 标准 A 事件,(d) 研究的保护因素≥1 个,(e) 研究的幸福结果≥1 个。数据提取后,使用文献计量学网络分析来直观显示所涵盖的主题。文献检索共获得 1,341 篇文章。其中 104 篇文章经过筛选后被保留下来。在所研究的健康结果中,QoL、功能和创伤后成长的研究较多。在各种干预类型(基于 CBT 的干预、第三波干预和补充性干预)中,有些干预对幸福感结果(主要是 QoL)有效,但许多干预的效果微乎其微或不显著。除社会支持外,外部资源和系统支持也未得到充分研究。强化干预和涉及日常实践的干预最有效地促进了幸福感。应将社会支持、执行功能、乐观主义和系统级资源等保护因素更好地纳入对军人/退伍军人的创伤后应激障碍护理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
期刊最新文献
A Scoping Review of Protective Factors That Contribute to Posttraumatic Wellbeing for Trauma-Exposed Military Service Members and Veterans. Collective Violence, Strengths, and Perceived Posttraumatic Growth: A Scoping Review. Community-Level Characteristics Associated With Resilience After Adversity: A Scoping Review of Research in Urban Locales. Factors Enhancing Resilience Among Youth Exposed to Macro-Level Violence in Spanish-Speaking Countries in Latin America. Psychosocial Strengths and Resilience Among Sexual and Gender Minority Youth Experiencing Homelessness: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1