Healthcare accessibility, utilization, and quality of life among internally displaced people during the Sudan war: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Conflict and Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1186/s13031-025-00655-3
Hind Elmukashfi ShamsEldin Elobied, Muhannad Bushra Masaad Ahmed, Ahmed Balla M Ahmed, Romaysa Abdelrahman Hassan Salih, Sohaib Mohammed Mokhtar Ahmed, Abdulhadi M A Mahgoub, Abdelmoula Hashim Abdelmagid Mohamed, Eman Hamid Abdallah Elamin, Al-Romaysa M Osman Khalafalla El-Haj, Mohamed Al-Hadi Hamed Abd-Allah, Arwa Yagoub Elmadani Ibrahim, Yousuf Alnoor Younis Mohamed, Arig Elias Shabo
{"title":"Healthcare accessibility, utilization, and quality of life among internally displaced people during the Sudan war: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Hind Elmukashfi ShamsEldin Elobied, Muhannad Bushra Masaad Ahmed, Ahmed Balla M Ahmed, Romaysa Abdelrahman Hassan Salih, Sohaib Mohammed Mokhtar Ahmed, Abdulhadi M A Mahgoub, Abdelmoula Hashim Abdelmagid Mohamed, Eman Hamid Abdallah Elamin, Al-Romaysa M Osman Khalafalla El-Haj, Mohamed Al-Hadi Hamed Abd-Allah, Arwa Yagoub Elmadani Ibrahim, Yousuf Alnoor Younis Mohamed, Arig Elias Shabo","doi":"10.1186/s13031-025-00655-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ongoing war in Sudan has triggered a massive displacement crisis, leaving internally displaced people (IDP) struggling to access healthcare services. This study aimed to investigate healthcare access, utilization, and the quality of life among Sudanese IDP during the conflict.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was carried out among Sudanese internally displaced people in six states. Quality of life was assessed using the WHOQOL-Bref questionnaire. Accessibility, utilization, and the consequences of not accessing healthcare were evaluated using an author-designed questionnaire, which was piloted prior to the study. Chi-square tests were used to analyze associations between categorical variables, while ANOVA was applied to assess differences in quality-of-life domains based on displacement duration and living conditions. Multinomial logistic regression identified predictors of healthcare affordability, with significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 612 participants, 40.3% reported facilities being very close, 13.0% faced waits over 2 h, and 54.3% found healthcare unaffordable. Only 33.6% always had access to qualified staff, and 22.8% of IDP visited public healthcare facilities supported by non-governmental organizations. The psychological domain had the highest quality-of-life mean score at 49.7 (18.1). Worsened symptoms (44%) were a common consequence of healthcare inaccessibility, while lack of transport (37.9%) was the most common barrier. Availability of qualified staff significantly increased the likelihood of seeking care (χ² = 11.30, p = 0.022). Quality-of-life domains varied significantly by displacement duration and living situation (p < 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed significant variations in healthcare access and utilization among Sudanese IDP, with quality-of-life domains lower than those of IDP in other countries. Interventions should prioritize innovative solutions like telemedicine, targeted support for vulnerable groups, and expanding health insurance coverage to enhance access and long-term health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54287,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-025-00655-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ongoing war in Sudan has triggered a massive displacement crisis, leaving internally displaced people (IDP) struggling to access healthcare services. This study aimed to investigate healthcare access, utilization, and the quality of life among Sudanese IDP during the conflict.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out among Sudanese internally displaced people in six states. Quality of life was assessed using the WHOQOL-Bref questionnaire. Accessibility, utilization, and the consequences of not accessing healthcare were evaluated using an author-designed questionnaire, which was piloted prior to the study. Chi-square tests were used to analyze associations between categorical variables, while ANOVA was applied to assess differences in quality-of-life domains based on displacement duration and living conditions. Multinomial logistic regression identified predictors of healthcare affordability, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: Among 612 participants, 40.3% reported facilities being very close, 13.0% faced waits over 2 h, and 54.3% found healthcare unaffordable. Only 33.6% always had access to qualified staff, and 22.8% of IDP visited public healthcare facilities supported by non-governmental organizations. The psychological domain had the highest quality-of-life mean score at 49.7 (18.1). Worsened symptoms (44%) were a common consequence of healthcare inaccessibility, while lack of transport (37.9%) was the most common barrier. Availability of qualified staff significantly increased the likelihood of seeking care (χ² = 11.30, p = 0.022). Quality-of-life domains varied significantly by displacement duration and living situation (p < 0.011).

Conclusion: This study revealed significant variations in healthcare access and utilization among Sudanese IDP, with quality-of-life domains lower than those of IDP in other countries. Interventions should prioritize innovative solutions like telemedicine, targeted support for vulnerable groups, and expanding health insurance coverage to enhance access and long-term health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict and Health
Conflict and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Conflict and Health is a highly-accessed, open access journal providing a global platform to disseminate insightful and impactful studies documenting the public health impacts and responses related to armed conflict, humanitarian crises, and forced migration.
期刊最新文献
Association between conflict intensity and health outcomes in contemporary conflicts, while accounting for the vulnerability and functioning of healthcare services. Correction: Health and well-being of older populations affected by humanitarian crises in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature. Evaluation of contact tracing performance during an Ebola virus disease outbreak in a complex security environment: the case of North Kivu province, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2018-2020. Healthcare accessibility, utilization, and quality of life among internally displaced people during the Sudan war: a cross-sectional study. A review of the response and the emergency medical teams (EMTs) deployment in Armenia following an explosion at a fuel depot near Stepanakert (Nagorno-Karabakh)/ in Armenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1