Investigating Effects of Providing Information and Professional Experience on Production of Stories in Response to Past-Behavior Questions

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Selection and Assessment Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1111/ijsa.70004
Marie-Eve Tescari, Adrian Bangerter, Christina Györkös, Charlène Padoan, Sandrine Fasel, Lucile Nicolier, Laurène Hondius, Karen Ohnmacht
{"title":"Investigating Effects of Providing Information and Professional Experience on Production of Stories in Response to Past-Behavior Questions","authors":"Marie-Eve Tescari,&nbsp;Adrian Bangerter,&nbsp;Christina Györkös,&nbsp;Charlène Padoan,&nbsp;Sandrine Fasel,&nbsp;Lucile Nicolier,&nbsp;Laurène Hondius,&nbsp;Karen Ohnmacht","doi":"10.1111/ijsa.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Past-behavior questions invite applicants to describe their behavior in a past work-related situation, that is, to tell a story about that situation. However, applicants often fail to produce stories in response to such questions. In two experiments (<i>n</i> = 91 and <i>n</i> = 102), we investigated the effects of providing information about questions and professional experience (2 × 2 between-subjects design) on the production of stories and interview performance. In Experiment 1, providing information and professional experience did not affect story production, but professional experience increased performance. In Experiment 2, we enhanced the manipulation of information, giving more explicit guidance about expected responses and increasing the contrast in professional experience. Experienced participants received better performance ratings than inexperienced ones. Neither providing information nor professional experience affected the production of stories, but both affected performance. Story narrative quality was coded post hoc in both studies. Providing information and professional experience did not affect narrative quality in Experiment 1 but did in Experiment 2. Results add to our understanding of individual differences affecting responses to past-behavior questions and have practical implications for facilitating appropriate responses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Past-behavior questions invite applicants to describe their behavior in a past work-related situation, that is, to tell a story about that situation. However, applicants often fail to produce stories in response to such questions. In two experiments (n = 91 and n = 102), we investigated the effects of providing information about questions and professional experience (2 × 2 between-subjects design) on the production of stories and interview performance. In Experiment 1, providing information and professional experience did not affect story production, but professional experience increased performance. In Experiment 2, we enhanced the manipulation of information, giving more explicit guidance about expected responses and increasing the contrast in professional experience. Experienced participants received better performance ratings than inexperienced ones. Neither providing information nor professional experience affected the production of stories, but both affected performance. Story narrative quality was coded post hoc in both studies. Providing information and professional experience did not affect narrative quality in Experiment 1 but did in Experiment 2. Results add to our understanding of individual differences affecting responses to past-behavior questions and have practical implications for facilitating appropriate responses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查回答过去行为问题时提供信息和专业经验对故事制作的影响
过去行为问题要求应聘者描述他们在过去与工作有关的情况下的行为,也就是说,讲述一个关于该情况的故事。然而,申请者往往无法用故事来回答这些问题。在两个实验(n = 91和n = 102)中,我们研究了提供有关问题和专业经验的信息(2 × 2被试设计)对故事制作和采访表现的影响。在实验1中,提供信息和专业经验不影响故事制作,但专业经验提高了性能。在实验2中,我们加强了对信息的操纵,对期望反应给予了更明确的指导,并增加了专业经验的对比。有经验的参与者比没有经验的参与者获得了更好的表现评分。提供信息和专业经验都不会影响故事的制作,但都会影响表演。在两项研究中,故事叙述质量都是事后编码的。在实验1中,提供信息和专业经验对叙述质量没有影响,但在实验2中有影响。结果增加了我们对个体差异影响对过去行为问题的反应的理解,并对促进适当的反应具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
31.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Selection and Assessment publishes original articles related to all aspects of personnel selection, staffing, and assessment in organizations. Using an effective combination of academic research with professional-led best practice, IJSA aims to develop new knowledge and understanding in these important areas of work psychology and contemporary workforce management.
期刊最新文献
What Draws Potential Applicants Towards an Organization? The Importance of Employer Brand Process Attributes and Applicants' Job Search Metacognitive Activities What Draws Potential Applicants Towards an Organization? The Importance of Employer Brand Process Attributes and Applicants' Job Search Metacognitive Activities Test Motivation and Performance of Older Versus Younger Test-Takers: Does Situational Judgment Test Stimulus Format Matter? Test Motivation and Performance of Older Versus Younger Test-Takers: Does Situational Judgment Test Stimulus Format Matter? Development of a Competency Model for Autistic Employment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1