Antoine Vautrin, Raphaël Thierrin, Patrik Wili, Samuel Klingler, Vivianne Chappuis, Peter Varga, Philippe Zysset
{"title":"Prediction of Dental Implants Primary Stability With Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Homogenized Finite Element Analysis","authors":"Antoine Vautrin, Raphaël Thierrin, Patrik Wili, Samuel Klingler, Vivianne Chappuis, Peter Varga, Philippe Zysset","doi":"10.1111/cid.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Predicting implant stability preoperatively remains a challenge. Computed tomography (CT) based finite element (FE) simulations virtually evaluate the mechanical performance of the bone-implant construct. However, translation requires trustworthy simulations based on clinically relevant CT data. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prediction accuracy of FE models created from cone-beam CT (CBCT) images against experimental results of primary implant stability in human bone specimens.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-three dental implants were inserted into bone biopsies extracted from three cadaveric mandibles, and biomechanical testing was performed to determine the load-bearing capacity in a previous study. CBCT-based sample-specific homogenized FE (hFE) models were used to predict ultimate force. The accuracy of the CBCT-based hFE model predictions was compared to the experimental results and to previous μCT-based hFE models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The ultimate load predicted by the CBCT-based hFE models correlated well with the experimental one (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.66) and was a better estimator than the peri-implant CBCT-based bone density (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.39) or μCT-based bone volume fraction (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.57). Although the results of the two hFE models were strongly correlated (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.91), the μCT-based simulation better predicted the experiments (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.81).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>By showing that CBCT-based hFE modeling can predict primary stability, this study represents an important step forward toward the clinical translatability of these numerical models as preoperative predictors of primary stability. Nevertheless, several challenges remain to be addressed, such as the lack of an accurate and quantitative way to calibrate CBCT images.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cid.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Predicting implant stability preoperatively remains a challenge. Computed tomography (CT) based finite element (FE) simulations virtually evaluate the mechanical performance of the bone-implant construct. However, translation requires trustworthy simulations based on clinically relevant CT data. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prediction accuracy of FE models created from cone-beam CT (CBCT) images against experimental results of primary implant stability in human bone specimens.
Material and Methods
Twenty-three dental implants were inserted into bone biopsies extracted from three cadaveric mandibles, and biomechanical testing was performed to determine the load-bearing capacity in a previous study. CBCT-based sample-specific homogenized FE (hFE) models were used to predict ultimate force. The accuracy of the CBCT-based hFE model predictions was compared to the experimental results and to previous μCT-based hFE models.
Results
The ultimate load predicted by the CBCT-based hFE models correlated well with the experimental one (R2 = 0.66) and was a better estimator than the peri-implant CBCT-based bone density (R2 = 0.39) or μCT-based bone volume fraction (R2 = 0.57). Although the results of the two hFE models were strongly correlated (R2 = 0.91), the μCT-based simulation better predicted the experiments (R2 = 0.81).
Conclusion
By showing that CBCT-based hFE modeling can predict primary stability, this study represents an important step forward toward the clinical translatability of these numerical models as preoperative predictors of primary stability. Nevertheless, several challenges remain to be addressed, such as the lack of an accurate and quantitative way to calibrate CBCT images.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal.
The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to:
New scientific developments relating to bone
Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues
Computer aided implant designs
Computer aided prosthetic designs
Immediate implant loading
Immediate implant placement
Materials relating to bone induction and conduction
New surgical methods relating to implant placement
New materials and methods relating to implant restorations
Methods for determining implant stability
A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.