Predicting the fracture load of asphalt concrete under TPB test using POA-optimized machine learning methods

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Construction and Building Materials Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140580
Huikun Ling , Xinyu Wang , Chuan Lv , Zhong Sun , Liangjun Liu , Junjie Wang
{"title":"Predicting the fracture load of asphalt concrete under TPB test using POA-optimized machine learning methods","authors":"Huikun Ling ,&nbsp;Xinyu Wang ,&nbsp;Chuan Lv ,&nbsp;Zhong Sun ,&nbsp;Liangjun Liu ,&nbsp;Junjie Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fracture load <em>P</em><sub><em>f</em></sub> is a critical parameter for evaluating the fracture behavior of asphalt concrete (AC). However, traditional experimental methods for determining <em>P</em><sub><em>f</em></sub> are time-consuming and costly. Thus, this study employs machine learning (ML) to predict the <em>P</em><sub><em>f</em></sub> of AC under three-point bending (TPB) test based on aggregate gradation, specimen dimensions, porosity, and temperature. The Pelican Optimization Algorithm (POA) is utilized to optimize the hyperparameters of the Random Forest Regressor (RFR), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Generalized Additive Model (GAM), and LSBoost. Model performance is compared through error analysis, and the effective fracture resistance (<em>K</em><sub>eff</sub>) computed with the optimized models is evaluated against predictions by the traditional Maximum Tangential Stress (MTS) and Maximum Tangential Strain (MTSN) fracture criteria. The results suggest that conventional ML algorithms tend to exhibit lower predictive accuracy, weaker correlation, and signs of overfitting. By applying POA optimization, all four models show improvements in predictive accuracy, <em>R</em>² values, and a notable reduction in overfitting. Among the optimized models, LSBoost-POA demonstrates the highest predictive accuracy and robustness. Under Mixed-Mode I/II loading conditions, the <em>K</em><sub>eff</sub> predictive performance of RFR-POA and LSBoost-POA significantly outperforms that of MTS and MTSN, with LSBoost-POA achieving the best results. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis reveals that for LSBoost-POA, the specimen size factor <em>λ</em> is the most influential parameter in <em>P</em><sub><em>f</em></sub> prediction, while the specimen height <em>H</em> has the least impact. These insights hold promising implications for applying machine learning to the study of fracture behavior in AC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"470 ","pages":"Article 140580"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825007287","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fracture load Pf is a critical parameter for evaluating the fracture behavior of asphalt concrete (AC). However, traditional experimental methods for determining Pf are time-consuming and costly. Thus, this study employs machine learning (ML) to predict the Pf of AC under three-point bending (TPB) test based on aggregate gradation, specimen dimensions, porosity, and temperature. The Pelican Optimization Algorithm (POA) is utilized to optimize the hyperparameters of the Random Forest Regressor (RFR), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Generalized Additive Model (GAM), and LSBoost. Model performance is compared through error analysis, and the effective fracture resistance (Keff) computed with the optimized models is evaluated against predictions by the traditional Maximum Tangential Stress (MTS) and Maximum Tangential Strain (MTSN) fracture criteria. The results suggest that conventional ML algorithms tend to exhibit lower predictive accuracy, weaker correlation, and signs of overfitting. By applying POA optimization, all four models show improvements in predictive accuracy, R² values, and a notable reduction in overfitting. Among the optimized models, LSBoost-POA demonstrates the highest predictive accuracy and robustness. Under Mixed-Mode I/II loading conditions, the Keff predictive performance of RFR-POA and LSBoost-POA significantly outperforms that of MTS and MTSN, with LSBoost-POA achieving the best results. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis reveals that for LSBoost-POA, the specimen size factor λ is the most influential parameter in Pf prediction, while the specimen height H has the least impact. These insights hold promising implications for applying machine learning to the study of fracture behavior in AC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
期刊最新文献
Particle shape effect on dynamic mechanical responses, energy conversion and fragmentation behaviours of granular materials under impact Investigation into the crack propagation behaviors of asphalt mixture containing recycled concrete aggregates using digital image correlation Transforming waste powder into two types of supplementary cementitious materials through a wet carbonation process Predicting the fracture load of asphalt concrete under TPB test using POA-optimized machine learning methods Experimental study and finite element analysis on interfacial mechanical behaviors of steel-UHPC composite structures in acidic environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1