Electric vs. magnetic: Which brain stimulation wins for bothering symptoms in multiple sclerosis?

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple sclerosis and related disorders Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2025.106365
Ahmed Dahshan , Hala Rashad El Habashy , Shahenda Al Menabbawy , Alaa Ahmed Shalan , Noha El Sawy
{"title":"Electric vs. magnetic: Which brain stimulation wins for bothering symptoms in multiple sclerosis?","authors":"Ahmed Dahshan ,&nbsp;Hala Rashad El Habashy ,&nbsp;Shahenda Al Menabbawy ,&nbsp;Alaa Ahmed Shalan ,&nbsp;Noha El Sawy","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2025.106365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease marked by fatigue, pain, cognitive impairment, and mood disorders. Pharmacological treatments often provide limited relief and have side effects, prompting interest in non-invasive neuromodulation techniques like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We aimed to compare the short-term efficacy of tDCS and TMS in alleviating fatigue, pain, depression, and cognitive impairment in MS patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a randomized, single-blinded, three-arm trial, 30 patients with relapsingremitting MS were assigned to active tDCS, active TMS, or placebo. The tDCS group received 2 mA anodal stimulation over the motor cortex for 20 min daily for five days, while the TMS group received 10 Hz stimulation at 80 % of the resting motor threshold for the same duration. The placebo group received sham stimulation. Outcomes were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both tDCS and TMS groups showed significant improvements in fatigue, pain, and depression compared to placebo (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). No significant cognitive changes were observed in any group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Short-term tDCS and TMS are effective for reducing fatigue, pain, and depression in MS patients, with tDCS showing potential for home use and TMS for clinical settings. Cognitive improvements may require longer treatment durations or combined therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 106365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034825001087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease marked by fatigue, pain, cognitive impairment, and mood disorders. Pharmacological treatments often provide limited relief and have side effects, prompting interest in non-invasive neuromodulation techniques like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We aimed to compare the short-term efficacy of tDCS and TMS in alleviating fatigue, pain, depression, and cognitive impairment in MS patients.

Methods

In a randomized, single-blinded, three-arm trial, 30 patients with relapsingremitting MS were assigned to active tDCS, active TMS, or placebo. The tDCS group received 2 mA anodal stimulation over the motor cortex for 20 min daily for five days, while the TMS group received 10 Hz stimulation at 80 % of the resting motor threshold for the same duration. The placebo group received sham stimulation. Outcomes were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS).

Results

Both tDCS and TMS groups showed significant improvements in fatigue, pain, and depression compared to placebo (p < 0.05). No significant cognitive changes were observed in any group.

Conclusion

Short-term tDCS and TMS are effective for reducing fatigue, pain, and depression in MS patients, with tDCS showing potential for home use and TMS for clinical settings. Cognitive improvements may require longer treatment durations or combined therapies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电与磁:哪种脑刺激能缓解多发性硬化症的症状?
多发性硬化症(MS)是一种以疲劳、疼痛、认知障碍和情绪障碍为特征的慢性疾病。药物治疗往往提供有限的缓解和副作用,促使人们对非侵入性神经调节技术的兴趣,如经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和经颅磁刺激(TMS)。我们的目的是比较tDCS和TMS在缓解MS患者疲劳、疼痛、抑郁和认知障碍方面的短期疗效。方法:在一项随机、单盲、三组试验中,30例复发缓解型MS患者被分配到活性tDCS、活性TMS或安慰剂组。tDCS组在运动皮层上每天接受20分钟的2 mA阳极刺激,持续5天,而TMS组在相同的时间内接受10 Hz的刺激,强度为静息运动阈值的80%。安慰剂组接受假刺激。采用疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)和多发性硬化症简要国际认知评估(BICAMS)对结果进行评估。结果与安慰剂组相比,tDCS组和TMS组在疲劳、疼痛和抑郁方面均有显著改善(p <;0.05)。在任何组中均未观察到明显的认知变化。结论短期tDCS和TMS可有效减轻多发性硬化症患者的疲劳、疼痛和抑郁,tDCS具有家庭应用和TMS临床应用的潜力。认知改善可能需要更长的治疗时间或联合治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
814
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource. A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.
期刊最新文献
Bridging perspectives on comorbidities in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study with individuals with lived experience and healthcare professionals Characterising executive functioning in the chronic phase of autoimmune encephalitis: A study by the Australian autoimmune encephalitis consortium Neurocognitive performance in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis Development of novel biomechanical outcomes using motion capture to characterize hand function in multiple sclerosis Cognitive-Motor dual-task assessments in people with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1