Umbrella review: CT of frontal, maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses for sexual dimorphism

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL Journal of forensic and legal medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2025.102838
Wahaj Anees , Debora Moreira , Marianna Arakelyan , Walbert Vieira , Luiz Renato Paranhos , Ademir Franco
{"title":"Umbrella review: CT of frontal, maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses for sexual dimorphism","authors":"Wahaj Anees ,&nbsp;Debora Moreira ,&nbsp;Marianna Arakelyan ,&nbsp;Walbert Vieira ,&nbsp;Luiz Renato Paranhos ,&nbsp;Ademir Franco","doi":"10.1016/j.jflm.2025.102838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to synthesize evidence on the use of computed tomography (CT) for sexual dimorphism based on the frontal (FS), maxillary (MS) and sphenoidal (SS) sinuses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An umbrella review was designed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) and considered the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) network. The study protocol was registered in Open science framework (OSF, <span><span>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5XWJU</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining FS, MS and SS through CT imaging were included. The search was performed across PubMed, SciELO, LILACS and Open Grey.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six eligible systematic reviews published between 2021 and 2024 were identified. These reviews analyzed the sinuses for parameters such as height, width, length, area, and volume. The studies predominantly focused on adults with age range spanning 13–97 years. The findings indicated accuracy rates for sexual dimorphism typically ranging between 60 % and 80 %, with MS generally being more dimorphic than the others. Two systematic reviews included meta-analyses, reporting sensitivity and specificity rates for MS of up to 72.3 % and 69 %, respectively. Cone beam CT yielded higher accuracy compared to multislice CT. However, the quality of studies was critically low or moderate based on AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS assessments – highlighting methodological inconsistencies and biases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The studied sinuses were considered adjuvant tools for sexual dimorphism. Better results might come from MS visualized by means of CBCT. Primary studies remain necessary for stronger evidence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 102838"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X25000393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to synthesize evidence on the use of computed tomography (CT) for sexual dimorphism based on the frontal (FS), maxillary (MS) and sphenoidal (SS) sinuses.

Methods

An umbrella review was designed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) and considered the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) network. The study protocol was registered in Open science framework (OSF, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5XWJU). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining FS, MS and SS through CT imaging were included. The search was performed across PubMed, SciELO, LILACS and Open Grey.

Results

Six eligible systematic reviews published between 2021 and 2024 were identified. These reviews analyzed the sinuses for parameters such as height, width, length, area, and volume. The studies predominantly focused on adults with age range spanning 13–97 years. The findings indicated accuracy rates for sexual dimorphism typically ranging between 60 % and 80 %, with MS generally being more dimorphic than the others. Two systematic reviews included meta-analyses, reporting sensitivity and specificity rates for MS of up to 72.3 % and 69 %, respectively. Cone beam CT yielded higher accuracy compared to multislice CT. However, the quality of studies was critically low or moderate based on AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS assessments – highlighting methodological inconsistencies and biases.

Conclusion

The studied sinuses were considered adjuvant tools for sexual dimorphism. Better results might come from MS visualized by means of CBCT. Primary studies remain necessary for stronger evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine publishes topical articles on aspects of forensic and legal medicine. Specifically the Journal supports research that explores the medical principles of care and forensic assessment of individuals, whether adult or child, in contact with the judicial system. It is a fully peer-review hybrid journal with a broad international perspective. The Journal accepts submissions of original research, review articles, and pertinent case studies, editorials, and commentaries in relevant areas of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Context of Practice, and Education and Training. The Journal adheres to strict publication ethical guidelines, and actively supports a culture of inclusive and representative publication.
期刊最新文献
Purple bowel misdiagnosed as intestinal hemorrhage Umbrella review: CT of frontal, maxillary and sphenoidal sinuses for sexual dimorphism Skull fractures or accessory sutures: A case report Sodium azide/nitrite suicides in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2022 Multidisciplinary analysis of ancient human skeletal remains using computed tomography: A case study from Cumae, Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1