Correlating Data-Driven Muscle Selection Approaches to Synergies for Gait Prediction

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3543743
Annika Guez;C. Sebastian Mancero Castillo;Balint Hodossy;Dario Farina;Ravi Vaidyanathan
{"title":"Correlating Data-Driven Muscle Selection Approaches to Synergies for Gait Prediction","authors":"Annika Guez;C. Sebastian Mancero Castillo;Balint Hodossy;Dario Farina;Ravi Vaidyanathan","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3543743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimizing sensors for physiological input is critical to enhance performance as well as minimize the cost and complexity of assistive devices (e.g. lower-limb exoskeletons). Electromyography (EMG) data can trace muscle activation for gait kinematics prediction. However, identifying optimal muscle groups for electrode placement and the potential variance between users has not yet been established. In this study, we use data-driven channel selection techniques on EMG signals to find muscle group combinations that maximize prediction performance. We apply greedy search (Recursive Feature Elimination, RFE) and variance-based (Principal Component Analysis, PCA) methods to select muscle groups during gait, without prior knowledge of musculoskeletal inter-connectivity. The selected muscle subsets are evaluated using the normalized accuracy of a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), mapping muscle activity to knee flexion angle in a one-step-ahead scheme. The RFE selection led to an average predicted knee angle validation accuracy of <inline-formula> <tex-math>$4.52\\pm 1.85$ </tex-math></inline-formula> % higher than the PCA approach, suggesting that dynamic search is more appropriate than a variance analysis of the signals. Whilst the RFE-selected muscle groups differed across subjects, the selected muscles were consistently spread out over more than 80% of the extracted synergy groups. This study underlines the value of incorporating synergistic information when developing gait prediction models, and reveals that maximizing the number of synergy groups could constitute the basis of muscle selection frameworks.","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"33 ","pages":"945-955"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10907970","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10907970/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimizing sensors for physiological input is critical to enhance performance as well as minimize the cost and complexity of assistive devices (e.g. lower-limb exoskeletons). Electromyography (EMG) data can trace muscle activation for gait kinematics prediction. However, identifying optimal muscle groups for electrode placement and the potential variance between users has not yet been established. In this study, we use data-driven channel selection techniques on EMG signals to find muscle group combinations that maximize prediction performance. We apply greedy search (Recursive Feature Elimination, RFE) and variance-based (Principal Component Analysis, PCA) methods to select muscle groups during gait, without prior knowledge of musculoskeletal inter-connectivity. The selected muscle subsets are evaluated using the normalized accuracy of a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), mapping muscle activity to knee flexion angle in a one-step-ahead scheme. The RFE selection led to an average predicted knee angle validation accuracy of $4.52\pm 1.85$ % higher than the PCA approach, suggesting that dynamic search is more appropriate than a variance analysis of the signals. Whilst the RFE-selected muscle groups differed across subjects, the selected muscles were consistently spread out over more than 80% of the extracted synergy groups. This study underlines the value of incorporating synergistic information when developing gait prediction models, and reveals that maximizing the number of synergy groups could constitute the basis of muscle selection frameworks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关联数据驱动的肌肉选择方法协同步态预测
优化用于生理输入的传感器对于提高性能以及降低辅助设备(例如下肢外骨骼)的成本和复杂性至关重要。肌电图(Electromyography, EMG)数据可以追踪肌肉的活动,用于步态运动学预测。然而,确定电极放置的最佳肌肉群和用户之间的潜在差异尚未建立。在这项研究中,我们使用数据驱动的通道选择技术在肌电信号上找到最大限度地预测性能的肌肉群组合。我们应用贪婪搜索(递归特征消除,RFE)和基于方差的(主成分分析,PCA)方法来选择步态中的肌肉群,而不需要预先了解肌肉骨骼的相互连接。选择的肌肉子集使用多层感知器(MLP)的归一化精度进行评估,在一步前的方案中将肌肉活动映射到膝关节屈曲角度。RFE选择导致平均预测膝关节角验证精度比PCA方法高4.52美元/ 1.85美元,表明动态搜索比方差分析信号更合适。虽然rfe选择的肌肉群在受试者之间有所不同,但选择的肌肉一致分布在超过80%的提取协同组中。这项研究强调了在开发步态预测模型时纳入协同信息的价值,并揭示了最大化协同组的数量可以构成肌肉选择框架的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
479
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.
期刊最新文献
A non-invasive, MRCP-based BCI for online communication. HD-sEMG-Based Control Using Neck Muscles and Shallow Neural Networks: Assessing Performance in Rehabilitation-Oriented Tasks. Ankle Exoskeleton Assistance Reduces Knee Contact Force during Walking in Individuals with Cerebral Palsy. Self-organizing recruitment of compensatory cortical areas post-stroke can maximize residual motor performance. Myo-Hand XP: User-Centred Co-Design, Clinical Implementation, and Commercial Translation of an Immersive Virtual Reality Intervention for Myoelectric Prosthesis Training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1