Impacts of Skilled Nursing Facility Change of Ownership on Staffing: A Staggered Difference-in-Difference Analysis

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105530
Rachel A. Prusynski DPT, PhD , Harsha Amaravadi MPH , Bianca K. Frogner PhD , Tracy M. Mroz PhD, OTR/L
{"title":"Impacts of Skilled Nursing Facility Change of Ownership on Staffing: A Staggered Difference-in-Difference Analysis","authors":"Rachel A. Prusynski DPT, PhD ,&nbsp;Harsha Amaravadi MPH ,&nbsp;Bianca K. Frogner PhD ,&nbsp;Tracy M. Mroz PhD, OTR/L","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are experiencing significant regulatory scrutiny. Recent federal rules established guidelines for increased transparency in reporting of changes in SNF ownership and controversial minimum staffing levels for nurse occupations. This study examined whether SNF changes in ownership were independently associated with changes in levels of nurse, non-nurse, administrator, and contract staff.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Staggered difference-in-differences analysis using SNF ownership and staffing data from January 2018 to June 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>11,543 SNFs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Outcomes were patient census and the following staffing variables: staffing hours per patient-day (HPPD) for all patient care staff, nurse staffing HPPD, non-nurse staffing HPPD, administrator staffing hours, and percentage of staff employed as contractors. We compared outcomes before and after ownership change for SNFs that changed ownership, using SNFs that never changed ownership as a control group. We adjusted for care quality, rural location, ownership, payer mix, occupancy, chain status, and state.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between January 2018 and June 2023, a total of 2508 SNFs (21.7%) changed ownership. The change in ownership average treatment effects were a census increase of 2.36 patients per day and a 0.07-HPPD decline in overall staffing, driven by a 0.09-HPPD decline in nurse staffing (−2.23% relative to control group means). Conversely, ownership change was associated with a 0.02-HPPD increase in non-nurse staffing (2.12% relative to control group means), a 0.52-hour (6.43%) increase in administrator staffing, and no change in contractor staffing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>We found that SNF ownership changes were associated with declines in overall patient care staffing, driven by nurse staffing declines. As nurse occupations comprise more than 80% of staff time in SNFs, results support concerns that SNF ownership changes may negatively impact staffing operations and suggest that SNFs undergoing changes in ownership may have increased difficulty meeting potential new nurse minimum staffing standards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 5","pages":"Article 105530"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025000477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are experiencing significant regulatory scrutiny. Recent federal rules established guidelines for increased transparency in reporting of changes in SNF ownership and controversial minimum staffing levels for nurse occupations. This study examined whether SNF changes in ownership were independently associated with changes in levels of nurse, non-nurse, administrator, and contract staff.

Design

Staggered difference-in-differences analysis using SNF ownership and staffing data from January 2018 to June 2023.

Setting and Participants

11,543 SNFs.

Methods

Outcomes were patient census and the following staffing variables: staffing hours per patient-day (HPPD) for all patient care staff, nurse staffing HPPD, non-nurse staffing HPPD, administrator staffing hours, and percentage of staff employed as contractors. We compared outcomes before and after ownership change for SNFs that changed ownership, using SNFs that never changed ownership as a control group. We adjusted for care quality, rural location, ownership, payer mix, occupancy, chain status, and state.

Results

Between January 2018 and June 2023, a total of 2508 SNFs (21.7%) changed ownership. The change in ownership average treatment effects were a census increase of 2.36 patients per day and a 0.07-HPPD decline in overall staffing, driven by a 0.09-HPPD decline in nurse staffing (−2.23% relative to control group means). Conversely, ownership change was associated with a 0.02-HPPD increase in non-nurse staffing (2.12% relative to control group means), a 0.52-hour (6.43%) increase in administrator staffing, and no change in contractor staffing.

Conclusions and Implications

We found that SNF ownership changes were associated with declines in overall patient care staffing, driven by nurse staffing declines. As nurse occupations comprise more than 80% of staff time in SNFs, results support concerns that SNF ownership changes may negatively impact staffing operations and suggest that SNFs undergoing changes in ownership may have increased difficulty meeting potential new nurse minimum staffing standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
熟练护理机构所有权变更对人员配备的影响:一个交错的差异分析。
目的:熟练护理设施(snf)正在经历重大的监管审查。最近的联邦法规制定了指导方针,以提高报告SNF所有权变化的透明度和有争议的护士职业最低人员配备水平。本研究考察了SNF所有权的变化是否与护士、非护士、管理人员和合同制员工水平的变化独立相关。设计:使用2018年1月至2023年6月SNF所有权和人员配备数据进行交错差异分析。设置和参与者:11543名snf。方法:结果是患者普查和以下人员配置变量:所有患者护理人员的每患者日工作时间(HPPD),护士人员配置HPPD,非护士人员配置HPPD,行政人员配置时间,以及作为承包商雇佣的员工百分比。我们比较了改变所有权的snf改变所有权前后的结果,使用从未改变所有权的snf作为对照组。我们调整了护理质量、农村位置、所有权、付款人组合、占用、连锁状态和州。结果:2018年1月至2023年6月,共有2508家snf(21.7%)更换了所有权。所有权平均治疗效果的变化是每天人口普查增加2.36名患者,总体人员编制下降0.07 hppd,由护士编制下降0.09 hppd驱动(相对于对照组平均值-2.23%)。相反,所有权的变化与非护士人员配备增加0.02-HPPD相关(相对于对照组平均值为2.12%),管理员人员配备增加0.52小时(6.43%),承包商人员配备没有变化。结论和意义:我们发现SNF所有权的变化与整体病人护理人员的减少有关,这是由护士人员减少引起的。由于护士职业占SNF员工时间的80%以上,研究结果支持了SNF所有权变化可能对人员配置操作产生负面影响的担忧,并表明经历所有权变化的SNF可能会增加满足潜在的新护士最低人员配置标准的难度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Can Dual-Task Assessment Be Used to Discriminate Recurrent Fallers in Older Populations? A Systematic Review Concordance Between the Minimum Data Set Kidney Impairment I1500 Item and eGFR Records in Nursing Homes Access to Mental Health Providers Among Older Adults With ADRD Using Telemedicine Multimorbidity Among Adults Aged 50 and Over in Europe and Israel: Prevalence and Associated Factors From SHARE Wave 9 Current Practice of Palliative Sedation in Dutch Nursing Homes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1