The nature of syntactic working memory during relative clause processing: fMRI evidence from multiple anatomic ROIs

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109107
Wenjia Zhang , Zhiqiang Yan , Jie Dong , Xinyi Liu , Aoke Zheng , Hong Liang , Hao Yan
{"title":"The nature of syntactic working memory during relative clause processing: fMRI evidence from multiple anatomic ROIs","authors":"Wenjia Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Yan ,&nbsp;Jie Dong ,&nbsp;Xinyi Liu ,&nbsp;Aoke Zheng ,&nbsp;Hong Liang ,&nbsp;Hao Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Relative clauses (RC) are a common embedded structure in natural language. They can be classified as Subject-extracted RC (SRC) and object-extracted RC (ORC). Previous studies have suggested an ORC advantage in Chinese. This is consistent with the memory-based theories, which propose that more syntactic working memory (SWM) is needed during the Chinese SRC processing than the ORC processing. However, it is still unclear about the nature of the SWM (language-specific vs. domain-general). In the current study, participants were asked to read Chinese SRC and ORC sentences while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning. Because of the important role of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) in SWM, these two brain regions were divided into sub-regions. Critically, LIFG<sub>orbital</sub> is more related to language-specific processing whereas LIFG<sub>opercular</sub> is more related to domain-general processing. Activation analyses and Granger causality (GC) analyses were both conducted. The results first provided more neurophysiological evidence of the ORC advantage in Chinese. More importantly, the results of activation analyses showed that LIFG<sub>oper</sub> was more activated in the contrast of SRC &gt; ORC. In contrast, the results of GC analyses showed that LIFG<sub>orb</sub> was more involved in the SRC-specific connectivity. Altogether, these results suggest that the SWM induced by the contrast of SRC &gt; ORC was related to both the language-specific and domain-general processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 109107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393225000429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relative clauses (RC) are a common embedded structure in natural language. They can be classified as Subject-extracted RC (SRC) and object-extracted RC (ORC). Previous studies have suggested an ORC advantage in Chinese. This is consistent with the memory-based theories, which propose that more syntactic working memory (SWM) is needed during the Chinese SRC processing than the ORC processing. However, it is still unclear about the nature of the SWM (language-specific vs. domain-general). In the current study, participants were asked to read Chinese SRC and ORC sentences while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning. Because of the important role of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) in SWM, these two brain regions were divided into sub-regions. Critically, LIFGorbital is more related to language-specific processing whereas LIFGopercular is more related to domain-general processing. Activation analyses and Granger causality (GC) analyses were both conducted. The results first provided more neurophysiological evidence of the ORC advantage in Chinese. More importantly, the results of activation analyses showed that LIFGoper was more activated in the contrast of SRC > ORC. In contrast, the results of GC analyses showed that LIFGorb was more involved in the SRC-specific connectivity. Altogether, these results suggest that the SWM induced by the contrast of SRC > ORC was related to both the language-specific and domain-general processing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
期刊最新文献
Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation shifts Time Reproduction in Opposite Directions for ADHD and TD Individuals. Towards a genetics of semantics? False memories and semantic memory organization in Williams syndrome The nature of syntactic working memory during relative clause processing: fMRI evidence from multiple anatomic ROIs Editorial Board Somatosensory influence on auditory cortical response of self-generated sound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1