Physiological team dynamics explored: physiological synchrony in medical simulation training.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Advances in simulation (London, England) Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1186/s41077-025-00335-5
Rafael Wespi, Andrea N Neher, Tanja Birrenbach, Stefan K Schauber, Marie Ottilie Frenkel, Helmut Schrom-Feiertag, Thomas C Sauter, Juliane E Kämmer
{"title":"Physiological team dynamics explored: physiological synchrony in medical simulation training.","authors":"Rafael Wespi, Andrea N Neher, Tanja Birrenbach, Stefan K Schauber, Marie Ottilie Frenkel, Helmut Schrom-Feiertag, Thomas C Sauter, Juliane E Kämmer","doi":"10.1186/s41077-025-00335-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For researchers and medical simulation trainers, measuring team dynamics is vital for providing targeted feedback that can lead to improved patient outcomes. It is also valuable for research, such as investigating which dynamics benefit team performance. Traditional assessment methods, such as questionnaires and observations, are often subjective and static, lacking the ability to capture team dynamics. To address these shortcomings, this study explores the use of physiological synchrony (PS) measured through electrocardiogram (ECG) data to evaluate team dynamics automated and in high-resolution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre observational field study was conducted involving 214 medical first responders during mixed reality (MR) mass casualty training sessions. Participants were equipped with electrocardiogram (ECG) sensors and MR gear. The study measured dyadic PS using heart rate (HR), root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), and standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN). Data were collected at high frequency and analysed using dynamic time warping (dtw) to assess fluctuations in PS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that PS varies significantly by task nature, with higher synchrony during cooperative tasks compared to baseline. Different ECG metrics offered unique insights into team dynamics. Proximity and scenario conditions influenced PS, with closer teamwork leading to higher PS. Smaller sampling intervals (e.g. 5 s) provided a detailed view of PS fluctuations over time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results demonstrate the potential of PS as an indicator of team performance and cohesion. High-resolution monitoring provides detailed insights into team dynamics, offering high-resolution feedback that traditional methods cannot provide. The integration of physiological measures into training programmes can enhance team performance by providing objective, high-resolution data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that PS, measured by ECG data, is sensitive to medical team activities, offering insights into team dynamics. Different ECG metrics highlight various aspects of team performance, and high-resolution monitoring captures detailed dynamics. Further research is needed to validate these findings across diverse scenarios. This approach could improve training methodologies, resulting in better-prepared medical teams and improved patient care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"10 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00335-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: For researchers and medical simulation trainers, measuring team dynamics is vital for providing targeted feedback that can lead to improved patient outcomes. It is also valuable for research, such as investigating which dynamics benefit team performance. Traditional assessment methods, such as questionnaires and observations, are often subjective and static, lacking the ability to capture team dynamics. To address these shortcomings, this study explores the use of physiological synchrony (PS) measured through electrocardiogram (ECG) data to evaluate team dynamics automated and in high-resolution.

Methods: A multicentre observational field study was conducted involving 214 medical first responders during mixed reality (MR) mass casualty training sessions. Participants were equipped with electrocardiogram (ECG) sensors and MR gear. The study measured dyadic PS using heart rate (HR), root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), and standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN). Data were collected at high frequency and analysed using dynamic time warping (dtw) to assess fluctuations in PS.

Results: Findings indicate that PS varies significantly by task nature, with higher synchrony during cooperative tasks compared to baseline. Different ECG metrics offered unique insights into team dynamics. Proximity and scenario conditions influenced PS, with closer teamwork leading to higher PS. Smaller sampling intervals (e.g. 5 s) provided a detailed view of PS fluctuations over time.

Discussion: The results demonstrate the potential of PS as an indicator of team performance and cohesion. High-resolution monitoring provides detailed insights into team dynamics, offering high-resolution feedback that traditional methods cannot provide. The integration of physiological measures into training programmes can enhance team performance by providing objective, high-resolution data.

Conclusion: This study shows that PS, measured by ECG data, is sensitive to medical team activities, offering insights into team dynamics. Different ECG metrics highlight various aspects of team performance, and high-resolution monitoring captures detailed dynamics. Further research is needed to validate these findings across diverse scenarios. This approach could improve training methodologies, resulting in better-prepared medical teams and improved patient care outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介绍:对于研究人员和医学模拟培训师来说,测量团队动态对于提供有针对性的反馈至关重要,而这些反馈可以改善患者的治疗效果。它对研究也很有价值,例如调查哪些动态有利于团队表现。传统的评估方法,如问卷调查和观察,往往是主观和静态的,缺乏捕捉团队动态的能力。为了解决这些不足,本研究探讨了利用心电图(ECG)数据测量的生理同步性(PS)来自动、高分辨率地评估团队动态:方法:在混合现实(MR)大规模伤亡培训课程中,对 214 名医疗急救人员进行了多中心实地观察研究。参与者配备了心电图(ECG)传感器和 MR 设备。研究使用心率(HR)、连续差值的均方根(RMSSD)和 NN 间隔的标准偏差(SDNN)测量了双人 PS。数据以高频率收集,并使用动态时间扭曲(dtw)进行分析,以评估 PS 的波动:结果:研究结果表明,PS 因任务性质的不同而有显著差异,与基线相比,合作任务期间的同步性更高。不同的心电图指标提供了对团队动态的独特见解。距离和场景条件对同步性有影响,团队合作距离越近,同步性越高。较小的采样间隔(如 5 秒)可提供 PS 随时间波动的详细情况:讨论:研究结果证明了 PS 作为团队表现和凝聚力指标的潜力。高分辨率监测可详细了解团队动态,提供传统方法无法提供的高分辨率反馈。通过提供客观、高分辨率的数据,将生理测量纳入培训计划可提高团队绩效:本研究表明,通过心电图数据测量的 PS 对医疗团队的活动非常敏感,可深入了解团队动态。不同的心电图指标突出了团队表现的各个方面,而高分辨率监测则捕捉到了详细的动态信息。还需要进一步研究,在不同场景中验证这些发现。这种方法可以改进培训方法,使医疗团队做好更充分的准备,改善患者护理效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the potential of virtual reality in nursing education: learner's insights and future directions. Neonatal resuscitation skills acquisition among healthcare providers after Helping Babies Breathe simulation training using improved tools across two regions in Tanzania. Physiological team dynamics explored: physiological synchrony in medical simulation training. What can simulation educators learn from the reluctant participant? An exploration of the factors influencing engagement amongst adult learners participating in paediatric simulation training. Combining forces to improve simulation-based practices for Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Responses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1