A Delphi-based needs assessment to identify and prioritise procedural skills through consensus for simulation-based learning in neurosurgery.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06922-4
Adam F Roche, Dara O Kavanagh, Darach Crimmins, Vincent Healy, Gulam Zilani, Lars Konge, Leizl Joy Nayahangan, Danyal Z Khan, Daniel Murray, Javier Francisco Cuello, Caitriona Cahir, Niamh Murphy, Claire M Condron
{"title":"A Delphi-based needs assessment to identify and prioritise procedural skills through consensus for simulation-based learning in neurosurgery.","authors":"Adam F Roche, Dara O Kavanagh, Darach Crimmins, Vincent Healy, Gulam Zilani, Lars Konge, Leizl Joy Nayahangan, Danyal Z Khan, Daniel Murray, Javier Francisco Cuello, Caitriona Cahir, Niamh Murphy, Claire M Condron","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06922-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Training of the neurosurgeon today differs greatly from that of the past, with several well-documented challenges contributing to reduced operative time for current cohorts. The Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCST) in the UK and Ireland have stated that simulation-based education (SBE) is part of the solution to tackle this training crisis. Our objective was to develop a prioritised list of technical skills through consensus with key opinion leaders (KOLs). This approach aimed to enhance understanding of the essential procedures that should shape a technical skills framework for neurosurgical simulation-based learning curricula.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilised a modified Delphi process and Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) Needs Assessment Formula (NAF) to reach consensus. A total of 71 procedures were included for initial analysis, which were extracted from all phases of the JCST curriculum and subsequent brainstorming with KOLs. A five person steering group oversaw the process, to ensure a robust methodological approach was followed at all stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For each of the three Delphi rounds, there were 32, 30, and 31 KOL responses, respectively. A prioritised list of 47 procedural skills was generated through consensus. The top three ranking procedures were patient positioning, pinning positions and flap design, intracranial pressure (ICP) probe insertion and external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion. Emphasis was placed on acute cranial trauma, degenerative spine, neuro-oncology and CSF diversion procedures as the categorical themes of highest priority.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We describe a multi-jurisdiction general needs assessment for technical skills in neurosurgical simulation training. This study will inform the design of future simulation-based learning curriculum in this sphere of training.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06922-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Training of the neurosurgeon today differs greatly from that of the past, with several well-documented challenges contributing to reduced operative time for current cohorts. The Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCST) in the UK and Ireland have stated that simulation-based education (SBE) is part of the solution to tackle this training crisis. Our objective was to develop a prioritised list of technical skills through consensus with key opinion leaders (KOLs). This approach aimed to enhance understanding of the essential procedures that should shape a technical skills framework for neurosurgical simulation-based learning curricula.

Methods: We utilised a modified Delphi process and Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) Needs Assessment Formula (NAF) to reach consensus. A total of 71 procedures were included for initial analysis, which were extracted from all phases of the JCST curriculum and subsequent brainstorming with KOLs. A five person steering group oversaw the process, to ensure a robust methodological approach was followed at all stages.

Results: For each of the three Delphi rounds, there were 32, 30, and 31 KOL responses, respectively. A prioritised list of 47 procedural skills was generated through consensus. The top three ranking procedures were patient positioning, pinning positions and flap design, intracranial pressure (ICP) probe insertion and external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion. Emphasis was placed on acute cranial trauma, degenerative spine, neuro-oncology and CSF diversion procedures as the categorical themes of highest priority.

Conclusions: We describe a multi-jurisdiction general needs assessment for technical skills in neurosurgical simulation training. This study will inform the design of future simulation-based learning curriculum in this sphere of training.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于德尔菲的需求评估,通过达成共识,确定神经外科模拟学习的程序技能并排定优先顺序。
背景:今天的神经外科医生的培训与过去有很大的不同,有几个充分证明的挑战有助于减少当前队列的手术时间。英国和爱尔兰的外科培训联合委员会(JCST)表示,基于模拟的教育(SBE)是解决这一培训危机的解决方案的一部分。我们的目标是通过与关键意见领袖(kol)达成共识,制定一份技术技能的优先列表。这种方法旨在加强对基本程序的理解,这些程序应形成神经外科模拟学习课程的技术技能框架。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法和哥本哈根医学教育与模拟学院(CAMES)需求评估公式(NAF)达成共识。总共包括71个程序进行初步分析,这些程序是从JCST课程的所有阶段提取出来的,随后与kol进行头脑风暴。一个五人指导小组监督整个过程,以确保在所有阶段都遵循一个强有力的方法方法。结果:对于三轮德尔菲,每轮分别有32、30和31个KOL回应。通过协商一致产生了47项程序性技能的优先清单。排在前三位的手术分别是患者体位、钉针位置和皮瓣设计、颅内压(ICP)探头插入和脑室外引流(EVD)插入。重点放在急性颅脑损伤,退行性脊柱,神经肿瘤学和脑脊液转移手术作为最高优先级的分类主题。结论:我们描述了神经外科模拟训练中技术技能的多辖区一般需求评估。本研究将为未来该领域模拟学习课程的设计提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the clinical decision-making performance of large language models in clinically oriented thoracic anatomy scenarios: a comparative evaluation study. Headache knowledge of young neurologists in Germany. The role of narrative medicine in cultivating professional competencies: a mediation analysis of empathy among medical students. Feasibility of a blended learning approach to teaching comprehensive geriatric assessment: a mixed-methods educational study. Virtual reality simulator-based assessment of non-technical skills in eye surgery: managing complex cataract surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1