Radical Vic: Politics and Performance on the Popular London Stage, ca. 1820–50

IF 0.7 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1017/jbr.2024.182
Stephen Ridgwell
{"title":"Radical Vic: Politics and Performance on the Popular London Stage, ca. 1820–50","authors":"Stephen Ridgwell","doi":"10.1017/jbr.2024.182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In nineteenth-century London, theater-going was a genuinely mass activity. Within a rapidly expanding entertainment industry, working-class playgoers abounded. Opened to the public in 1818, the Coburg Theatre, later renamed the Victoria and known as the Vic, developed an especially strong association with popular drama. Although much has been written on the kind of work that places like the Vic presented, much less has been said about their operation as plebeian public spheres, or what I term here “radical half-spaces.” Active in the campaign for political reform in the early 1830s, and the site of numerous socially critical melodramas, under the joint managerial team of David Osbaldiston and Eliza Vincent, the Coburg/Victoria would later align itself to Chartism. All the while, the theater continued to function as a profitable commercial enterprise. By showing how audiences at the Vic sought (and found) knowledge and cultural capital, as much as entertainment and spectacle, the article suggests that when considering the period's alternative radical spaces, account should be made of such avowedly populist establishments as London's minor theaters, and the complex assemblages of time, place, and people they represented.</p>","PeriodicalId":46738,"journal":{"name":"Journal of British Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of British Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2024.182","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In nineteenth-century London, theater-going was a genuinely mass activity. Within a rapidly expanding entertainment industry, working-class playgoers abounded. Opened to the public in 1818, the Coburg Theatre, later renamed the Victoria and known as the Vic, developed an especially strong association with popular drama. Although much has been written on the kind of work that places like the Vic presented, much less has been said about their operation as plebeian public spheres, or what I term here “radical half-spaces.” Active in the campaign for political reform in the early 1830s, and the site of numerous socially critical melodramas, under the joint managerial team of David Osbaldiston and Eliza Vincent, the Coburg/Victoria would later align itself to Chartism. All the while, the theater continued to function as a profitable commercial enterprise. By showing how audiences at the Vic sought (and found) knowledge and cultural capital, as much as entertainment and spectacle, the article suggests that when considering the period's alternative radical spaces, account should be made of such avowedly populist establishments as London's minor theaters, and the complex assemblages of time, place, and people they represented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激进的维克:政治和表演在流行的伦敦舞台上,约1820-50
在19世纪的伦敦,看戏是一种真正的群众活动。在迅速发展的娱乐产业中,工人阶级的戏剧观众比比皆是。科堡剧院于1818年向公众开放,后来更名为维多利亚,并以维克而闻名,与流行戏剧建立了特别紧密的联系。虽然很多人都写过像维多利亚这样的地方所呈现的作品,但很少有人说它们作为平民公共领域的运作,或者我在这里所说的“激进的半空间”。在19世纪30年代早期的政治改革运动中表现活跃,在大卫·奥斯巴尔德斯顿和伊丽莎·文森特的联合管理团队下,科堡/维多利亚剧院上演了许多社会批判情节剧,后来与宪章运动结盟。与此同时,剧院继续作为一个盈利的商业企业运作。通过展示维克剧院的观众如何寻找(并发现)知识和文化资本,以及娱乐和奇观,这篇文章表明,在考虑这一时期的另类激进空间时,应该考虑到伦敦的小剧院等公开的民粹主义机构,以及它们所代表的时间、地点和人群的复杂组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
163
期刊介绍: The official publication of the North American Conference on British Studies (NACBS), the Journal of British Studies, has positioned itself as the critical resource for scholars of British culture from the Middle Ages through the present. Drawing on both established and emerging approaches, JBS presents scholarly articles and books reviews from renowned international authors who share their ideas on British society, politics, law, economics, and the arts. In 2005 (Vol. 44), the journal merged with the NACBS publication Albion, creating one journal for NACBS membership. The NACBS also sponsors an annual conference , as well as several academic prizes, graduate fellowships, and undergraduate essay contests .
期刊最新文献
Arguing with Catholic Women: Devotion, Polemic, and Female Agency in the Theological Crisis of the 1620s Race, Blood, and Soil: Viscount Lymington and Britain’s Homegrown Agrarian Fascism Rethinking Periodization, Priorities, and Liberalism in British Queer History “I Am Not Anti Black Music But …”: Popular Music, the NME , and Race in Late Twentieth-Century Britain One British Archive: Stocked Stacks in the Great Plains: British and Irish Collections at the University of Kansas’s Kenneth Spencer Research Library
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1