Consistent Safety and Efficacy of Sotatercept for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in BMPR2 Mutation Carriers and Noncarriers: A Planned Analysis of Phase 2, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial (PULSAR).
David Montani, Vallerie V McLaughlin, J Simon R Gibbs, Mardi Gomberg-Maitland, Marius M Hoeper, Ioana R Preston, Rogerio Souza, Aaron B Waxman, Pilar Escribano Subias, Jeremy Feldman, Gisela M Meyer, Karen M Olsson, Florence Coulet, Solaiappan Manimaran, Yujie Zhao, Anna Lau, Janethe de Oliveira Pena, David B Badesch, Marc Humbert
{"title":"Consistent Safety and Efficacy of Sotatercept for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in <i>BMPR2</i> Mutation Carriers and Noncarriers: A Planned Analysis of Phase 2, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial (PULSAR).","authors":"David Montani, Vallerie V McLaughlin, J Simon R Gibbs, Mardi Gomberg-Maitland, Marius M Hoeper, Ioana R Preston, Rogerio Souza, Aaron B Waxman, Pilar Escribano Subias, Jeremy Feldman, Gisela M Meyer, Karen M Olsson, Florence Coulet, Solaiappan Manimaran, Yujie Zhao, Anna Lau, Janethe de Oliveira Pena, David B Badesch, Marc Humbert","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202409-1698OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of genetic variant status on sotatercept efficacy and effect of sotatercept treatment on biomarkers in pulmonary arterial hypertension Methods: PULSAR (NCT03496207) was a phase 2, randomized, controlled study of sotatercept vs placebo added to background therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Participants had DNA sequencing done at baseline to detect genetic variants in disease-associated genes (<i>ACVRL1, BMPR2, CAV1, EIF2AK4, ENG, KCNA3, KCNK3</i>, and <i>SMAD9</i>). Safety (adverse events) and efficacy (pulmonary vascular resistance, 6-minute walk distance) were assessed by variant status and treatment at 24 weeks. Serum levels of <i>BMPR2</i> mRNA and N-terminal pro-hormone B-type natriuretic peptide were assessed at baseline and 24 weeks by treatment and variant status. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the change from baseline by treatment and variant status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 76 participants included, 25 had pathogenic variants detected (23 <i>BMPR2</i>; 2 other) and 51 had no variants or variants of uncertain significance. <i>BMPR2</i> mutation carriers were younger and more frequently on triple therapy but had less severe clinical characteristics at baseline. Changes at 24 weeks in pulmonary vascular resistance and 6-minute walk distance did not differ by variant status. <i>BMPR2</i> gene expression varied less than twofold from baseline over time, irrespective of treatment or variant status. The adverse events profile was generally consistent with that seen in the parent PULSAR study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest consistent safety and clinical efficacy of sotatercept for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, irrespective of <i>BMPR2</i> variant status. Clinical trial registration available at www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov, ID: NCT03496207.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202409-1698OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of genetic variant status on sotatercept efficacy and effect of sotatercept treatment on biomarkers in pulmonary arterial hypertension Methods: PULSAR (NCT03496207) was a phase 2, randomized, controlled study of sotatercept vs placebo added to background therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Participants had DNA sequencing done at baseline to detect genetic variants in disease-associated genes (ACVRL1, BMPR2, CAV1, EIF2AK4, ENG, KCNA3, KCNK3, and SMAD9). Safety (adverse events) and efficacy (pulmonary vascular resistance, 6-minute walk distance) were assessed by variant status and treatment at 24 weeks. Serum levels of BMPR2 mRNA and N-terminal pro-hormone B-type natriuretic peptide were assessed at baseline and 24 weeks by treatment and variant status. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the change from baseline by treatment and variant status.
Results: Of 76 participants included, 25 had pathogenic variants detected (23 BMPR2; 2 other) and 51 had no variants or variants of uncertain significance. BMPR2 mutation carriers were younger and more frequently on triple therapy but had less severe clinical characteristics at baseline. Changes at 24 weeks in pulmonary vascular resistance and 6-minute walk distance did not differ by variant status. BMPR2 gene expression varied less than twofold from baseline over time, irrespective of treatment or variant status. The adverse events profile was generally consistent with that seen in the parent PULSAR study.
Conclusions: These results suggest consistent safety and clinical efficacy of sotatercept for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, irrespective of BMPR2 variant status. Clinical trial registration available at www.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.