Explainable machine learning model for predicting acute pancreatitis mortality in the intensive care unit.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY BMC Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1186/s12876-025-03723-3
Meng Jiang, Xiao-Peng Wu, Xing-Chen Lin, Chang-Li Li
{"title":"Explainable machine learning model for predicting acute pancreatitis mortality in the intensive care unit.","authors":"Meng Jiang, Xiao-Peng Wu, Xing-Chen Lin, Chang-Li Li","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03723-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current prediction models are suboptimal for determining mortality risk in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP); this might be improved by using a machine learning (ML) model. In this study, we aimed to construct an explainable ML model to calculate the risk of mortality in patients with AP admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) and compared it with existing scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A gradient-boosting ML (XGBoost) model was developed and externally validated based on two public databases: Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC, training cohort) and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD, validation cohort). We compared the performance of the XGBoost model with validated clinical risk scoring systems (the APACHE IV, SOFA, and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis [BISAP]) by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method was applied to provide the explanation behind the prediction outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The XGBoost model performed better than the clinical scoring systems in correctly predicting mortality risk of AP patients, achieving an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94). When set the sensitivity at 100% for death prediction, the model had a specificity of 38%, much higher than the APACHE IV, SOFA and BISAP score, which had a specificity of 1%, 16% and 1% respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This model might increase identification of very low-risk patients who can be safely monitored in a general ward for management. By making the model explainable, physicians would be able to better understand the reasoning behind the prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03723-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current prediction models are suboptimal for determining mortality risk in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP); this might be improved by using a machine learning (ML) model. In this study, we aimed to construct an explainable ML model to calculate the risk of mortality in patients with AP admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) and compared it with existing scoring systems.

Methods: A gradient-boosting ML (XGBoost) model was developed and externally validated based on two public databases: Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC, training cohort) and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD, validation cohort). We compared the performance of the XGBoost model with validated clinical risk scoring systems (the APACHE IV, SOFA, and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis [BISAP]) by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method was applied to provide the explanation behind the prediction outcome.

Results: The XGBoost model performed better than the clinical scoring systems in correctly predicting mortality risk of AP patients, achieving an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94). When set the sensitivity at 100% for death prediction, the model had a specificity of 38%, much higher than the APACHE IV, SOFA and BISAP score, which had a specificity of 1%, 16% and 1% respectively.

Conclusions: This model might increase identification of very low-risk patients who can be safely monitored in a general ward for management. By making the model explainable, physicians would be able to better understand the reasoning behind the prediction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于预测重症监护病房急性胰腺炎死亡率的可解释机器学习模型。
背景:目前的预测模型在确定急性胰腺炎(AP)患者的死亡风险方面并不理想;这可以通过使用机器学习(ML)模型来改善。在本研究中,我们旨在构建一个可解释的ML模型来计算重症监护病房(ICU)住院AP患者的死亡风险,并将其与现有评分系统进行比较。方法:基于两个公共数据库:重症监护医学信息集市(MIMIC,培训队列)和eICU合作研究数据库(eICU- crd,验证队列),开发梯度增强ML (XGBoost)模型并进行外部验证。我们通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分析,将XGBoost模型的性能与经过验证的临床风险评分系统(APACHE IV、SOFA和急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数[BISAP])进行了比较。采用SHapley加性解释(SHapley Additive exPlanations)方法对预测结果进行解释。结果:XGBoost模型在正确预测AP患者死亡风险方面优于临床评分系统,AUC为0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94)。当死亡预测灵敏度为100%时,该模型的特异性为38%,远高于APACHE IV评分、SOFA评分和BISAP评分的特异性,后者的特异性分别为1%、16%和1%。结论:该模型可能会增加对非常低风险患者的识别,这些患者可以在普通病房进行安全监测。通过使模型具有可解释性,医生将能够更好地理解预测背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Single-cell transcriptomic landscape of intrahepatic B Cells in MASH. Survival and complications in older adult patients with resectable gastric cancer according to number of resected lymph nodes: a cohort study. Prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: clinical features and independent predictors of histopathological confirmation via EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/fine-needle biopsy. Appropriateness of stress ulcer prophylaxis and associated factors among patients in medical, surgical, and intensive care units at Wolaita Sodo university comprehensive specialized hospital, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1