Impact of a smartphone application for appropriate antibiotic prescribing at three tertiary hospitals; an international, multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Clinical Microbiology and Infection Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.026
R I Helou, G Catho, L Faxén, M Hulscher, S Teerenstra, J Conly, B D Huttner, T Tängdén, A Verbon
{"title":"Impact of a smartphone application for appropriate antibiotic prescribing at three tertiary hospitals; an international, multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.","authors":"R I Helou, G Catho, L Faxén, M Hulscher, S Teerenstra, J Conly, B D Huttner, T Tängdén, A Verbon","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Smartphone applications (apps) for antibiotic prescribing have been studied in observational studies. Here, we assessed whether use of a smartphone app increased appropriateness of antibiotic therapy (AAT) in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An antibiotic stewardship app (Firstline.org) was populated with local guidelines and tested in a stepped-wedged cluster randomised trial in three hospitals in the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland. Defined clusters were randomised per hospital for the intervention (use of app) or standard of care. Primary outcome was AAT assessed by chart review in 15 random patients per cluster per intervention period. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes and user analytics. A questionnaire identifying barriers to app use was disseminated. Multivariable multilevel logistic models with time periods as fixed effects to adjust for time trend and treatment as fixed effects were employed to estimate the odds ratio of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve clusters in the Netherlands (1085 patients) were included, 12 in Sweden (362 patients) and 8 in Switzerland (653 patients). Overall, AAT was not increased (2.0% ([95%CI: -5.92 to 9.97]) in the intervention arm compared to control across the 3 centres. Average app use by cluster was associated with an AAT increase (1.9% [95%CI: 1.18 - 2.62]) across study centres; 3.2% in the Netherlands (p<0.01), 2.8% in Switzerland (p<0.01), and remained similar in Sweden (0.4%; p= 0.46). No difference was found for the other secondary outcomes. Main barriers for app use reported in the questionnaire were easily forgetting using the app and having other tools to help prescribing antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the introduction of a stewardship app did not significantly increase AAT, but a pre-specified secondary analysis of app use frequency was associated with a small but significant improvement of AAT. Variable uptake of the app, co-existing routes to guidelines and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic during the trial likely had an impact on the results.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, trial number NCT03793946.</p><p><strong>Trial funding: </strong>JPIAMR, grant number JPIAMR2017-045.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Smartphone applications (apps) for antibiotic prescribing have been studied in observational studies. Here, we assessed whether use of a smartphone app increased appropriateness of antibiotic therapy (AAT) in hospitals.

Methods: An antibiotic stewardship app (Firstline.org) was populated with local guidelines and tested in a stepped-wedged cluster randomised trial in three hospitals in the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland. Defined clusters were randomised per hospital for the intervention (use of app) or standard of care. Primary outcome was AAT assessed by chart review in 15 random patients per cluster per intervention period. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes and user analytics. A questionnaire identifying barriers to app use was disseminated. Multivariable multilevel logistic models with time periods as fixed effects to adjust for time trend and treatment as fixed effects were employed to estimate the odds ratio of treatment.

Results: Twelve clusters in the Netherlands (1085 patients) were included, 12 in Sweden (362 patients) and 8 in Switzerland (653 patients). Overall, AAT was not increased (2.0% ([95%CI: -5.92 to 9.97]) in the intervention arm compared to control across the 3 centres. Average app use by cluster was associated with an AAT increase (1.9% [95%CI: 1.18 - 2.62]) across study centres; 3.2% in the Netherlands (p<0.01), 2.8% in Switzerland (p<0.01), and remained similar in Sweden (0.4%; p= 0.46). No difference was found for the other secondary outcomes. Main barriers for app use reported in the questionnaire were easily forgetting using the app and having other tools to help prescribing antibiotics.

Conclusions: Overall, the introduction of a stewardship app did not significantly increase AAT, but a pre-specified secondary analysis of app use frequency was associated with a small but significant improvement of AAT. Variable uptake of the app, co-existing routes to guidelines and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic during the trial likely had an impact on the results.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, trial number NCT03793946.

Trial funding: JPIAMR, grant number JPIAMR2017-045.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
期刊最新文献
From medical editors: a call to the global infectious diseases and clinical microbiology community. ORCHESTRA Delphi Consensus: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Rheumatological Patients. Late HIV diagnosis - a tale of successes and failures. Four months daily rifampicin versus three months daily rifampicin/isoniazid for the treatment of tuberculosis infection in asylum seekers: a randomized controlled trial. Impact of a smartphone application for appropriate antibiotic prescribing at three tertiary hospitals; an international, multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1