Association between intraoperative electroencephalograph complexity index and postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a prospective cohort study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s00540-025-03471-4
Xiao-Yi Hu, Yu-Chen Dai, Lan-Yue Zhu, Jian-Jun Yang, Jie Sun, Mu-Huo Ji
{"title":"Association between intraoperative electroencephalograph complexity index and postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Xiao-Yi Hu, Yu-Chen Dai, Lan-Yue Zhu, Jian-Jun Yang, Jie Sun, Mu-Huo Ji","doi":"10.1007/s00540-025-03471-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary method for predicting POD (postoperative confusion) relies on the analysis of clinical features. Brain activity complexity is a promising factor associated with the state of consciousness. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of EEG (electroencephalography) complexity changes in predicting POD in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2024 to August 2024, 289 elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery were recruited at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Intraoperative EEG data from patients were collected and then EEG nonlinear features were extracted by MATLAB custom scripts. The logistic regression and CNN (convolutional neural networks) were used to explore the predictive effect of nonlinear features on POD from both static and dynamic perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low permutation Lempel-Ziv complexity (PLZC) among the EEG nonlinear features emerged as an independent risk factor for POD [OR = 0.210; 95% CI (0.050-0.850); p = 0.029]. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed a poor area under the curve of 0.615 (95% CI 0.517-0.711) for PLZC in predicting POD. After the inclusion of temporal factors, the ROC analysis indicated that the EEG nonlinear indices had a moderate predictive effect on POD [AUC = 0.701; (95% CI 0.541-0.862)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EEG nonlinear feature indices may be effective biomarkers for POD and could help predict POD in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-025-03471-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The primary method for predicting POD (postoperative confusion) relies on the analysis of clinical features. Brain activity complexity is a promising factor associated with the state of consciousness. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of EEG (electroencephalography) complexity changes in predicting POD in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Methods: From January 2024 to August 2024, 289 elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery were recruited at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Intraoperative EEG data from patients were collected and then EEG nonlinear features were extracted by MATLAB custom scripts. The logistic regression and CNN (convolutional neural networks) were used to explore the predictive effect of nonlinear features on POD from both static and dynamic perspectives.

Results: Low permutation Lempel-Ziv complexity (PLZC) among the EEG nonlinear features emerged as an independent risk factor for POD [OR = 0.210; 95% CI (0.050-0.850); p = 0.029]. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed a poor area under the curve of 0.615 (95% CI 0.517-0.711) for PLZC in predicting POD. After the inclusion of temporal factors, the ROC analysis indicated that the EEG nonlinear indices had a moderate predictive effect on POD [AUC = 0.701; (95% CI 0.541-0.862)].

Conclusions: EEG nonlinear feature indices may be effective biomarkers for POD and could help predict POD in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of spinal ultrasonography just before caudal epidural block for identifying tethered cord syndrome in urological cases with sacral dimples: a retrospective descriptive study. Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Considerations for interpreting clinical research findings on perioperative respiratory adverse events in children. Response to letter to the editor by Dr. Huang et al. Association between intraoperative electroencephalograph complexity index and postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1