Semi-Automated Interphase FISH (iFISH) Spot Scoring in CD138-Positive Cells: Validation Study for Genetic Abnormalities Detection in Multiple Myeloma

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Microscopy Research and Technique Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1002/jemt.24844
Daniela Borri, Chin Jia Lin, Victor Camillo, Renata K. Kishimoto, Mauren F. M. Santos, Roberta M. Safranauskas, Maria G. Cordeiro, Jason de L. Silva, Amanda A. C. Coimbra, Gilmara de S. E. Silva, Murilo C. Cervato, Elvira D. R. P. Velloso
{"title":"Semi-Automated Interphase FISH (iFISH) Spot Scoring in CD138-Positive Cells: Validation Study for Genetic Abnormalities Detection in Multiple Myeloma","authors":"Daniela Borri,&nbsp;Chin Jia Lin,&nbsp;Victor Camillo,&nbsp;Renata K. Kishimoto,&nbsp;Mauren F. M. Santos,&nbsp;Roberta M. Safranauskas,&nbsp;Maria G. Cordeiro,&nbsp;Jason de L. Silva,&nbsp;Amanda A. C. Coimbra,&nbsp;Gilmara de S. E. Silva,&nbsp;Murilo C. Cervato,&nbsp;Elvira D. R. P. Velloso","doi":"10.1002/jemt.24844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We conducted a study to validate the automated scoring of Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) in a routine cytogenetics laboratory using selected CD138-positive cells in samples from patients with multiple myeloma. A workstation was optimized based on the manufacturer's configurations. Six commercial probes (<i>CDKN2C/CKS1B</i>, <i>RB1/DLEU1/LAMP1</i>, <i>TP53/CEN17</i>, <i>FGFR3::IGH</i>, <i>CCND1::IGH</i>, and <i>IGH::MAF</i>) were examined to detect gains, losses, and rearrangements of genes across a total of 180 slides. We used reference values proposed by the European Myeloma Network (10% for rearrangements and 20% for gains and losses) to compare the accuracy of manual, automated, and semi-automated (automated coupled with manual revision) scoring. The time spent by the biologist to perform semi-automated and manual scoring was compared. Automated scoring was not effective and lacked validation. In contrast, semi-automated scoring proved to be efficient and highly accurate for all probes and offered time-saving benefits for deletion/gain probes. These findings suggest that semi-automated iFISH scoring for multiple myeloma is feasible and could become a routine practice in cytogenetics laboratories.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18684,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy Research and Technique","volume":"88 7","pages":"2001-2008"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy Research and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jemt.24844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted a study to validate the automated scoring of Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) in a routine cytogenetics laboratory using selected CD138-positive cells in samples from patients with multiple myeloma. A workstation was optimized based on the manufacturer's configurations. Six commercial probes (CDKN2C/CKS1B, RB1/DLEU1/LAMP1, TP53/CEN17, FGFR3::IGH, CCND1::IGH, and IGH::MAF) were examined to detect gains, losses, and rearrangements of genes across a total of 180 slides. We used reference values proposed by the European Myeloma Network (10% for rearrangements and 20% for gains and losses) to compare the accuracy of manual, automated, and semi-automated (automated coupled with manual revision) scoring. The time spent by the biologist to perform semi-automated and manual scoring was compared. Automated scoring was not effective and lacked validation. In contrast, semi-automated scoring proved to be efficient and highly accurate for all probes and offered time-saving benefits for deletion/gain probes. These findings suggest that semi-automated iFISH scoring for multiple myeloma is feasible and could become a routine practice in cytogenetics laboratories.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
cd138阳性细胞的半自动化间期FISH (FISH)斑点评分:多发性骨髓瘤遗传异常检测的验证研究
我们进行了一项研究,以验证荧光原位杂交(FISH)在常规细胞遗传学实验室的自动评分,使用选择的cd138阳性细胞样本来自多发性骨髓瘤患者。根据制造商的配置对工作站进行了优化。我们检测了6个商业探针(CDKN2C/CKS1B, RB1/DLEU1/LAMP1, TP53/CEN17, FGFR3::IGH, CCND1::IGH和IGH::MAF),以检测总共180张载玻片上基因的增益,损失和重排。我们使用欧洲骨髓瘤网络(European Myeloma Network)提出的参考值(重排10%,得失20%)来比较手动、自动化和半自动(自动化与手动修订相结合)评分的准确性。比较了生物学家进行半自动和手动评分所花费的时间。自动评分并不有效,而且缺乏验证。相比之下,半自动评分被证明对所有探针都是高效和高度准确的,并且为删除/增益探针提供了节省时间的好处。这些发现表明,半自动iFISH评分多发性骨髓瘤是可行的,可以成为细胞遗传学实验室的常规做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microscopy Research and Technique
Microscopy Research and Technique 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Microscopy Research and Technique (MRT) publishes articles on all aspects of advanced microscopy original architecture and methodologies with applications in the biological, clinical, chemical, and materials sciences. Original basic and applied research as well as technical papers dealing with the various subsets of microscopy are encouraged. MRT is the right form for those developing new microscopy methods or using the microscope to answer key questions in basic and applied research.
期刊最新文献
Accelerating Prostate Cancer Detection Through Histopathological Image Analysis Using Artificial Intelligence. A Camera-Like Dual-Defocus Curvature Wavefront Sensor With GPU Acceleration for Real-Time Quantitative Phase Imaging. Measuring Molecular Forces With Atomic Force Microscopy 1: Solvent Influence on Hydrophobic Interactions. Biogenic Synthesis of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles: Characterization, Biological Activities and Their Corrosion Inhibition Properties. Prospecting the Antibiofilm Potential of Bioactive Secondary Metabolites of Fungal Endophyte Cephalotheca foveolata (N11) Against Biofilm-Forming Bacteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1