Modern Trends of Drain Placement in Primary Bariatric Surgery: An MBSAQIP Analysis of 526,723 Patients.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07760-5
Daniel J Meyer, Sukhdeep Jatana, Daniel W Birch, Noah J Switzer, Shahzeer Karmali, Valentin Mocanu
{"title":"Modern Trends of Drain Placement in Primary Bariatric Surgery: An MBSAQIP Analysis of 526,723 Patients.","authors":"Daniel J Meyer, Sukhdeep Jatana, Daniel W Birch, Noah J Switzer, Shahzeer Karmali, Valentin Mocanu","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07760-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prophylactic drain use during primary bariatric surgeries continues despite previous literature cautioning against their routine use. Modern drain utilization and associated outcomes remain largely poorly studied which limits selective utilization and perhaps may lead to excess morbidity and healthcare resource utilization. This study aimed to reassess current trends of drain use in primary bariatric procedures, factors driving surgeons to place drains, and patient outcomes associated with drain placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing the most common primary bariatric surgery operations from 2020 to 2022 were included using the Metabolic and Bariatric Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database. Two cohorts were created, a drain placed (DP) cohort and no drain (ND) cohort, which were then compared in terms of baseline characteristics, rates of complications, and length of stay. Multivariate modeling was performed to assess the effect of drains on various complications and factors associated with drain placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 526,723 included patients, drain utilization decreased across operative years (8.7% in 2020 to 6.1% in 2022, p < 0.001). Factors associated with drain placement in multivariate models included older age, higher BMI, partially dependent functional status, renal insufficiency, venous thromboembolism, hypoalbuminemia, and non-sleeve anastomotic procedures. Drain placement was associated with increased risk of numerous complications on bivariate analysis, which was still significant in multivariate analysis, including 30-day serious complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.24, p < 0.001), anastomotic leak (aOR 2.1, p < 0.001), organ space infection (aOR 2.0, p < 0.001), reoperation (aOR 1.2, p = 0.036), and excess length of stay (LOS, aOR 1.45, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The frequency of prophylactic drain placement during primary bariatric surgical procedures has decreased in recent years and patients with drain placement seem to have increased 30-day morbidity, including longer length of stay. Independent predictors of drain placement include increased age and metabolic burden along with anastomotic procedures. Surgeons should be judicious in selecting patients for drain placement and future prospective, controlled studies may better answer drain placement association with complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1377-1386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07760-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prophylactic drain use during primary bariatric surgeries continues despite previous literature cautioning against their routine use. Modern drain utilization and associated outcomes remain largely poorly studied which limits selective utilization and perhaps may lead to excess morbidity and healthcare resource utilization. This study aimed to reassess current trends of drain use in primary bariatric procedures, factors driving surgeons to place drains, and patient outcomes associated with drain placement.

Methods: Patients undergoing the most common primary bariatric surgery operations from 2020 to 2022 were included using the Metabolic and Bariatric Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database. Two cohorts were created, a drain placed (DP) cohort and no drain (ND) cohort, which were then compared in terms of baseline characteristics, rates of complications, and length of stay. Multivariate modeling was performed to assess the effect of drains on various complications and factors associated with drain placement.

Results: Of 526,723 included patients, drain utilization decreased across operative years (8.7% in 2020 to 6.1% in 2022, p < 0.001). Factors associated with drain placement in multivariate models included older age, higher BMI, partially dependent functional status, renal insufficiency, venous thromboembolism, hypoalbuminemia, and non-sleeve anastomotic procedures. Drain placement was associated with increased risk of numerous complications on bivariate analysis, which was still significant in multivariate analysis, including 30-day serious complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.24, p < 0.001), anastomotic leak (aOR 2.1, p < 0.001), organ space infection (aOR 2.0, p < 0.001), reoperation (aOR 1.2, p = 0.036), and excess length of stay (LOS, aOR 1.45, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The frequency of prophylactic drain placement during primary bariatric surgical procedures has decreased in recent years and patients with drain placement seem to have increased 30-day morbidity, including longer length of stay. Independent predictors of drain placement include increased age and metabolic burden along with anastomotic procedures. Surgeons should be judicious in selecting patients for drain placement and future prospective, controlled studies may better answer drain placement association with complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性减肥手术引流管放置的现代趋势:526,723例患者的MBSAQIP分析
背景:在原发性减肥手术中,预防性引流术的使用仍在继续,尽管先前的文献警告其常规使用。现代排水利用和相关结果的研究仍然很少,这限制了选择性利用,并可能导致过度发病率和医疗资源利用。本研究旨在重新评估目前引流管在原发性减肥手术中的使用趋势、促使外科医生放置引流管的因素以及与引流管放置相关的患者结果。方法:使用代谢和减肥认证和质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)数据库纳入2020年至2022年接受最常见的原发性减肥手术的患者。创建了两个队列,放置引流管(DP)队列和不放置引流管(ND)队列,然后比较基线特征、并发症发生率和住院时间。采用多变量模型来评估引流管对各种并发症和与引流管放置相关的因素的影响。结果:在526,723例纳入的患者中,引流管使用率在手术期间下降(2020年为8.7%,2022年为6.1%)。结论:近年来,原发性减肥手术中预防性引流管放置的频率有所下降,放置引流管的患者似乎增加了30天的发病率,包括更长的住院时间。引流管放置的独立预测因素包括年龄增加和代谢负担以及吻合手术。外科医生在选择引流管放置的患者时应谨慎,未来的前瞻性对照研究可能更好地回答引流管放置与并发症的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass: Does Duodenal Exclusion Matter? Short-term Safety of one Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Versus Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S): 30-day Results from the OASIS trial. Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery Versus Nutritional Interventions in Adolescents: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Influence of Heart Function on the Assessment of MASLD Using Indocyanine Green Clearance. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Overweight and Obesity among School-Aged Children in Zhuzhou, China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1