Determining the Importance of Lifestyle Risk Factors in Predicting Binge Eating Disorder After Bariatric Surgery Using Machine Learning Models and Lifestyle Scores.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07765-0
Maryam Mousavi, Mastaneh Rajabian Tabesh, Seyyedeh Mahila Moghadami, Atoosa Saidpour, Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi
{"title":"Determining the Importance of Lifestyle Risk Factors in Predicting Binge Eating Disorder After Bariatric Surgery Using Machine Learning Models and Lifestyle Scores.","authors":"Maryam Mousavi, Mastaneh Rajabian Tabesh, Seyyedeh Mahila Moghadami, Atoosa Saidpour, Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07765-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was conducted to assess the association between lifestyle risk factors (LRF) and odds of binge eating disorder (BED) 2 years post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) using lifestyle score (LS) and machine learning (ML) models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the current study, 450 individuals who had undergone LSG 2 years prior to participation were enrolled. BED was assessed using BES questionnaire. The collected data for LRF included smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity (PA), fruit and vegetable intake, overweight/obesity, and percentage excess weight loss (EWL%). ML models included: logistic regression (LG), KNN, decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), SVM, XGBoost, and deep learning or artificial neurol network (ANN). Additionally, accumulative LRF was assessed using LS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty-two subjects (26.1%) met the criteria for BED 2 years after LSG. Participants who were in the highest quartile of the lifestyle score (nearly worst) had significantly three times higher odds of BED compared to the lowest quartile (nearly optimal) (p trend = 0.01). Furthermore, RF, LG, SVM, and ANN had the highest accuracy (about 75%) in predicting BED compared to other ML models (between 60 and 72%). Among the lifestyle risk factors, insufficient PA, lower vegetable consumption, a higher level of BMI, and lower EWL% were independently associated with BED (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that poor lifestyle patterns are associated with the development of BED, in contrast to non-BED individuals. Given the prevalence of this disorder among LSG participants, lifestyle risk factors must receive special attention after BS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1396-1406"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07765-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to assess the association between lifestyle risk factors (LRF) and odds of binge eating disorder (BED) 2 years post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) using lifestyle score (LS) and machine learning (ML) models.

Methods: In the current study, 450 individuals who had undergone LSG 2 years prior to participation were enrolled. BED was assessed using BES questionnaire. The collected data for LRF included smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity (PA), fruit and vegetable intake, overweight/obesity, and percentage excess weight loss (EWL%). ML models included: logistic regression (LG), KNN, decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), SVM, XGBoost, and deep learning or artificial neurol network (ANN). Additionally, accumulative LRF was assessed using LS.

Results: One hundred and twenty-two subjects (26.1%) met the criteria for BED 2 years after LSG. Participants who were in the highest quartile of the lifestyle score (nearly worst) had significantly three times higher odds of BED compared to the lowest quartile (nearly optimal) (p trend = 0.01). Furthermore, RF, LG, SVM, and ANN had the highest accuracy (about 75%) in predicting BED compared to other ML models (between 60 and 72%). Among the lifestyle risk factors, insufficient PA, lower vegetable consumption, a higher level of BMI, and lower EWL% were independently associated with BED (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that poor lifestyle patterns are associated with the development of BED, in contrast to non-BED individuals. Given the prevalence of this disorder among LSG participants, lifestyle risk factors must receive special attention after BS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用机器学习模型和生活方式评分确定生活方式风险因素在预测减肥手术后暴饮暴食障碍中的重要性。
背景:本研究采用生活方式评分(LS)和机器学习(ML)模型评估腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)后2年生活方式风险因素(LRF)与暴食症(BED)几率之间的关系。方法:在目前的研究中,纳入了450名在参与前2年接受过LSG的个体。BED采用BES问卷进行评估。收集的LRF数据包括吸烟、饮酒、体力活动(PA)、水果和蔬菜摄入量、超重/肥胖和超重减重百分比(EWL%)。ML模型包括:逻辑回归(LG)、KNN、决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)、XGBoost和深度学习或人工神经网络(ANN)。此外,使用LS评估累积LRF。结果:122名受试者(26.1%)在LSG术后2年达到BED标准。生活方式得分最高的四分位数(几乎最差)的参与者患BED的几率是最低四分位数(几乎最佳)的三倍(p趋势= 0.01)。此外,与其他ML模型(60 - 72%)相比,RF、LG、SVM和ANN在预测BED方面具有最高的准确性(约75%)。在生活方式的危险因素中,PA不足、蔬菜摄入量低、BMI水平高和EWL%低与BED独立相关(p结论:我们的研究结果表明,与非BED个体相比,不良的生活方式与BED的发生有关。鉴于这种疾病在LSG参与者中的流行,BS后生活方式的危险因素必须得到特别关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
A Pain-informed Predictive Model and Mediation Analysis for Postoperative Nausea after Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: Insights from the PAIN OUT Registry. Conversion to One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease after Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ten-Year Follow-Up for Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bariatric Surgery and Pharmacological Treatments for People with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Gastric Volumetric Filling Capacity Before and After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomechanical Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1