Mario Ceddia, Tea Romasco, Luca Comuzzi, Alessandro Cipollina, Adriano Piattelli, Natalia Di Pietro, Bartolomeo Trentadue
{"title":"Finite element analysis of primary healing implants with different transmucosal designs.","authors":"Mario Ceddia, Tea Romasco, Luca Comuzzi, Alessandro Cipollina, Adriano Piattelli, Natalia Di Pietro, Bartolomeo Trentadue","doi":"10.1111/jopr.14044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the response of peri-implant tissues, both hard and soft, to mechanical stress when using a primary healing implant (PHI) with two different transmucosal profiles: concave (Model A) and divergent (Model B). The investigation also sought to observe bone modeling under post-extraction conditions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The methodology involved the creation of a three-dimensional bone model of the first molar region, derived from a computed tomography scan. Subsequently, two implants were inserted into the bone site and subjected to a loading force of 100 N at a 45° angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of stress analysis, using the von Mises criterion, indicated that Model A exhibited a more uniform stress distribution within the soft tissues, registering a maximum value of 75 MPa, in contrast to 126 MPa observed in Model B. Concerning implant stress, the peak value was recorded at the conometric connection zone between the implant and the abutment, measuring 138 MPa for Model B and 125 MPa for Model A. The study specifically analyzed cortical bone stress, which revealed levels of 72 MPa for Model B and 64 MPa for Model A. Additionally, stress distribution in immature bone ranged from 1.3 to 9 MPa for Model A and from 1.5 to 12 MPa for Model B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The finite element method represents a valuable tool for the design and optimization of implant shapes, taking into account occlusal loads and specific anatomical locations. This approach aims to enhance the stimulation of both soft and hard tissues, thereby mitigating the risk of implant failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.14044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the response of peri-implant tissues, both hard and soft, to mechanical stress when using a primary healing implant (PHI) with two different transmucosal profiles: concave (Model A) and divergent (Model B). The investigation also sought to observe bone modeling under post-extraction conditions.
Materials and methods: The methodology involved the creation of a three-dimensional bone model of the first molar region, derived from a computed tomography scan. Subsequently, two implants were inserted into the bone site and subjected to a loading force of 100 N at a 45° angle.
Results: The results of stress analysis, using the von Mises criterion, indicated that Model A exhibited a more uniform stress distribution within the soft tissues, registering a maximum value of 75 MPa, in contrast to 126 MPa observed in Model B. Concerning implant stress, the peak value was recorded at the conometric connection zone between the implant and the abutment, measuring 138 MPa for Model B and 125 MPa for Model A. The study specifically analyzed cortical bone stress, which revealed levels of 72 MPa for Model B and 64 MPa for Model A. Additionally, stress distribution in immature bone ranged from 1.3 to 9 MPa for Model A and from 1.5 to 12 MPa for Model B.
Conclusions: The finite element method represents a valuable tool for the design and optimization of implant shapes, taking into account occlusal loads and specific anatomical locations. This approach aims to enhance the stimulation of both soft and hard tissues, thereby mitigating the risk of implant failure.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.