Finite element analysis of primary healing implants with different transmucosal designs.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1111/jopr.14044
Mario Ceddia, Tea Romasco, Luca Comuzzi, Alessandro Cipollina, Adriano Piattelli, Natalia Di Pietro, Bartolomeo Trentadue
{"title":"Finite element analysis of primary healing implants with different transmucosal designs.","authors":"Mario Ceddia, Tea Romasco, Luca Comuzzi, Alessandro Cipollina, Adriano Piattelli, Natalia Di Pietro, Bartolomeo Trentadue","doi":"10.1111/jopr.14044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the response of peri-implant tissues, both hard and soft, to mechanical stress when using a primary healing implant (PHI) with two different transmucosal profiles: concave (Model A) and divergent (Model B). The investigation also sought to observe bone modeling under post-extraction conditions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The methodology involved the creation of a three-dimensional bone model of the first molar region, derived from a computed tomography scan. Subsequently, two implants were inserted into the bone site and subjected to a loading force of 100 N at a 45° angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of stress analysis, using the von Mises criterion, indicated that Model A exhibited a more uniform stress distribution within the soft tissues, registering a maximum value of 75 MPa, in contrast to 126 MPa observed in Model B. Concerning implant stress, the peak value was recorded at the conometric connection zone between the implant and the abutment, measuring 138 MPa for Model B and 125 MPa for Model A. The study specifically analyzed cortical bone stress, which revealed levels of 72 MPa for Model B and 64 MPa for Model A. Additionally, stress distribution in immature bone ranged from 1.3 to 9 MPa for Model A and from 1.5 to 12 MPa for Model B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The finite element method represents a valuable tool for the design and optimization of implant shapes, taking into account occlusal loads and specific anatomical locations. This approach aims to enhance the stimulation of both soft and hard tissues, thereby mitigating the risk of implant failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.14044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the response of peri-implant tissues, both hard and soft, to mechanical stress when using a primary healing implant (PHI) with two different transmucosal profiles: concave (Model A) and divergent (Model B). The investigation also sought to observe bone modeling under post-extraction conditions.

Materials and methods: The methodology involved the creation of a three-dimensional bone model of the first molar region, derived from a computed tomography scan. Subsequently, two implants were inserted into the bone site and subjected to a loading force of 100 N at a 45° angle.

Results: The results of stress analysis, using the von Mises criterion, indicated that Model A exhibited a more uniform stress distribution within the soft tissues, registering a maximum value of 75 MPa, in contrast to 126 MPa observed in Model B. Concerning implant stress, the peak value was recorded at the conometric connection zone between the implant and the abutment, measuring 138 MPa for Model B and 125 MPa for Model A. The study specifically analyzed cortical bone stress, which revealed levels of 72 MPa for Model B and 64 MPa for Model A. Additionally, stress distribution in immature bone ranged from 1.3 to 9 MPa for Model A and from 1.5 to 12 MPa for Model B.

Conclusions: The finite element method represents a valuable tool for the design and optimization of implant shapes, taking into account occlusal loads and specific anatomical locations. This approach aims to enhance the stimulation of both soft and hard tissues, thereby mitigating the risk of implant failure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
期刊最新文献
Obtaining full-arch implant scan with smartphone video and deep learning: An in vitro investigation on trueness and precision. Sleep medicine, sleep apnea, and prosthodontics. Issue Information - Editorial Board Factors affecting stability of surgical guides in mandibular unilateral distal extension situation: An in vitro study. Finite element analysis of primary healing implants with different transmucosal designs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1