Obtaining full-arch implant scan with smartphone video and deep learning: An in vitro investigation on trueness and precision.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1111/jopr.14041
Junying Li, Zhaozhao Chen, Fei Liu, Berna Saglik, Gustavo Mendonca, Hom-Lay Wang
{"title":"Obtaining full-arch implant scan with smartphone video and deep learning: An in vitro investigation on trueness and precision.","authors":"Junying Li, Zhaozhao Chen, Fei Liu, Berna Saglik, Gustavo Mendonca, Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"10.1111/jopr.14041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the accuracy of complete-arch implant scans generated by a smartphone camera and a deep learning model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A deep learning model was trained to generate 3D scans from smartphone videos using a maxillary edentulous model with 6 implants and scan bodies (SBs). Three test groups were created: (1) deep learning 3D reconstruction with 1500 training epochs (DL1), (2) deep learning 3D reconstruction with 5000 training epochs (DL2), and (3) scans obtained from an intraoral scanner (IOS). Each method was repeated 10 times, with a desktop scanner scan as the reference. Test scans were aligned to the reference using two methods: (a) aligning all SBs to evaluate the overall fit, and (b) aligning just the first and second SBs to simulate passive fitting test of multiple implant-supported prostheses. Linear deviations from the reference model (trueness) and within each group (precision) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the overall fit, the DL2 group (67.69 ± 33.29 µm) showed significantly better (p < 0.05) mean trueness than the DL1 group (127.82 ± 73.07 µm), and similar trueness to the IOS group (57.42 ± 36.09 µm). However, the DL2 group (98.12 ± 59.85 µm) showed worse (p < 0.05) precision compared to the IOS group (64.54 ± 42.53 µm). In the virtual passive-fitting test, the DL2 group showed similar trueness and accuracy compared to the IOS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the in vitro environment, combining smartphone videos with a deep learning model generated full arch implant scans with accuracy similar to an IOS. Although this accuracy is not good enough for clinical application, this approach shows promise as a potential direction for future development in economical full-arch implant scanning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.14041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of complete-arch implant scans generated by a smartphone camera and a deep learning model.

Materials and methods: A deep learning model was trained to generate 3D scans from smartphone videos using a maxillary edentulous model with 6 implants and scan bodies (SBs). Three test groups were created: (1) deep learning 3D reconstruction with 1500 training epochs (DL1), (2) deep learning 3D reconstruction with 5000 training epochs (DL2), and (3) scans obtained from an intraoral scanner (IOS). Each method was repeated 10 times, with a desktop scanner scan as the reference. Test scans were aligned to the reference using two methods: (a) aligning all SBs to evaluate the overall fit, and (b) aligning just the first and second SBs to simulate passive fitting test of multiple implant-supported prostheses. Linear deviations from the reference model (trueness) and within each group (precision) were analyzed.

Results: For the overall fit, the DL2 group (67.69 ± 33.29 µm) showed significantly better (p < 0.05) mean trueness than the DL1 group (127.82 ± 73.07 µm), and similar trueness to the IOS group (57.42 ± 36.09 µm). However, the DL2 group (98.12 ± 59.85 µm) showed worse (p < 0.05) precision compared to the IOS group (64.54 ± 42.53 µm). In the virtual passive-fitting test, the DL2 group showed similar trueness and accuracy compared to the IOS group.

Conclusions: In the in vitro environment, combining smartphone videos with a deep learning model generated full arch implant scans with accuracy similar to an IOS. Although this accuracy is not good enough for clinical application, this approach shows promise as a potential direction for future development in economical full-arch implant scanning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用智能手机视频和深度学习获得全弓种植体扫描:准确性和准确性的体外研究。
目的:探讨智能手机相机和深度学习模型生成的全弓种植体扫描的准确性。材料和方法:利用上颌无牙模型(含6个种植体和扫描体)训练深度学习模型,从智能手机视频中生成3D扫描。建立了三个测试组:(1)1500个训练epoch的深度学习3D重建(DL1),(2) 5000个训练epoch的深度学习3D重建(DL2),以及(3)口腔内扫描仪(IOS)的扫描结果。每种方法重复10次,以桌面扫描仪扫描为参考。使用两种方法将测试扫描与参考对齐:(a)对齐所有SBs以评估整体配合,(b)仅对齐第一和第二SBs以模拟多个种植体支持的假体的被动配合测试。分析与参考模型的线性偏差(真实度)和每组内的线性偏差(精度)。结果:在整体拟合方面,DL2组(67.69±33.29µm)的平均拟合度显著高于DL1组(127.82±73.07µm) (p < 0.05),与IOS组(57.42±36.09µm)相近。DL2组(98.12±59.85µm)的精度低于IOS组(64.54±42.53µm) (p < 0.05)。在虚拟被动拟合测试中,DL2组与IOS组的准确率相近。结论:在体外环境下,将智能手机视频与深度学习模型相结合,生成的全弓种植体扫描精度与IOS相似。虽然这种精度在临床应用中还不够好,但这种方法有望成为未来经济全弓种植体扫描的潜在发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
期刊最新文献
Influence of simulated gastric acid on surface roughness and substance loss of different dental veneering porcelains and different surface finishing protocols: An in vitro study. Five-year survival and failure patterns of complete arch fixed implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses: A retrospective analysis of 3300 laboratory cases. Effect of denture cleansers and surface treatments on the color stability, gloss, and wettability of CAD-CAM denture bases. Effect of resin type, cleaning solution, and aging on the mechanical properties and reliability of additively manufactured occlusal devices. Effect of clinical-crown height space on extra-narrow dental implant (2.9 mm) fracture load and failure mode.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1