Mechanical Power in Pressure-Controlled Ventilation: A Simple and Reliable Bedside Method.

Q4 Medicine Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001224
Jacob W M Snoep, Petra J Rietveld, Franciska van der Velde-Quist, Evert de Jonge, Abraham Schoe
{"title":"Mechanical Power in Pressure-Controlled Ventilation: A Simple and Reliable Bedside Method.","authors":"Jacob W M Snoep, Petra J Rietveld, Franciska van der Velde-Quist, Evert de Jonge, Abraham Schoe","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical power (MP) represents the amount of energy applied by the ventilator to the respiratory system over time. There are two main methods to calculate MP in mechanical ventilation. The first is the geometric method, which directly measures the dynamic inspiratory area of the pressure-volume loop during the respiratory cycle. The second involves using various algebraic equations to estimate MP. However, almost all calculations are either complex or not reliable compared with the geometric method, considered the gold standard. This study aimed to develop an easy to use, reliable equation for bedside calculation of MP and to compare its accuracy with other existing equations for calculating MP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a preliminary study, we measured MP in 56 cases who were mechanically ventilated and without spontaneous breathing efforts. The measurements were done at the ICU of a single university medical center in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the MP can be accurately calculated using an equation that incorporates the plateau pressure in 56 cases in 42 patients. The MP estimated with our new proposed equation (MP calculated using plateau pressure) correlated well with the reference value of MP with a bias of 0.2 J/min. The 95% limits of agreement (LoAs) were -3.1 to + 3.4 J/min. Other equations give the following bias and LoAs; bias of -0.8, LoA -3.8 to 1.9 J/min (van der Meijden equation), bias of -1.9, LoA -3.7 to -0.0 J/min (comprehensive Becher equation), bias of -2.4, LoA -4.5 to -0.3 J/min (simplified Becher equation), and a bias of -1.9, LoA -3.7 to 0.1 J/min (linear model equation).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The equation we propose to calculate MP in pressure-controlled ventilation is a reliable, simple, and accurate alternative for the previously published equations. Consequently, this method is highly suitable for routine use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 3","pages":"e1224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mechanical power (MP) represents the amount of energy applied by the ventilator to the respiratory system over time. There are two main methods to calculate MP in mechanical ventilation. The first is the geometric method, which directly measures the dynamic inspiratory area of the pressure-volume loop during the respiratory cycle. The second involves using various algebraic equations to estimate MP. However, almost all calculations are either complex or not reliable compared with the geometric method, considered the gold standard. This study aimed to develop an easy to use, reliable equation for bedside calculation of MP and to compare its accuracy with other existing equations for calculating MP.

Methods: In a preliminary study, we measured MP in 56 cases who were mechanically ventilated and without spontaneous breathing efforts. The measurements were done at the ICU of a single university medical center in the Netherlands.

Results: We found that the MP can be accurately calculated using an equation that incorporates the plateau pressure in 56 cases in 42 patients. The MP estimated with our new proposed equation (MP calculated using plateau pressure) correlated well with the reference value of MP with a bias of 0.2 J/min. The 95% limits of agreement (LoAs) were -3.1 to + 3.4 J/min. Other equations give the following bias and LoAs; bias of -0.8, LoA -3.8 to 1.9 J/min (van der Meijden equation), bias of -1.9, LoA -3.7 to -0.0 J/min (comprehensive Becher equation), bias of -2.4, LoA -4.5 to -0.3 J/min (simplified Becher equation), and a bias of -1.9, LoA -3.7 to 0.1 J/min (linear model equation).

Conclusions: The equation we propose to calculate MP in pressure-controlled ventilation is a reliable, simple, and accurate alternative for the previously published equations. Consequently, this method is highly suitable for routine use in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Case for Telemedicine-Enhanced Nighttime Staffing in a Neuro-ICU. Early Risk Stratification of Patients After Successfully Resuscitated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Without ST-Segment Elevation-The Angiography After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Without ST-Segment Elevation (TOMAHAWK) Risk Score. Mechanical Power in Pressure-Controlled Ventilation: A Simple and Reliable Bedside Method. Otoacoustic Emissions Testing to Identify Hearing Loss in the ICU: A Feasibility Study. Exploring the Extent and Depth of Clinical Education on Sepsis SEP-1 Core Measure and the Reported Impact on Outcomes and Compliance rate: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1