Are past ownership experience and satisfaction major determinants of endorsement and future demand for zero emission vehicle technology when accounting for vehicle characteristics?

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Research in Transportation Economics Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101535
Hui Shi, Konstadinos G. Goulias
{"title":"Are past ownership experience and satisfaction major determinants of endorsement and future demand for zero emission vehicle technology when accounting for vehicle characteristics?","authors":"Hui Shi,&nbsp;Konstadinos G. Goulias","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Considering the worldwide impacts of climate change, it is crucial to embrace sustainable transport alternatives in order to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases. This study seeks to probe the impact factors of future vehicle choices and recommendations to other potential users. Specifically, clustering is first done based on vehicle attributes to group users' future vehicle intentions. Then a weighted multinomial logistic model (MNL) is developed to study the impact factors of people's future vehicle demand. Following that, three distinct models are evaluated to identify factors influencing consumer willingness to recommend three different zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) listed by the California Air Resources Board, namely plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), battery electric vehicles (BEVs), and hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), with past experiences (reflected by post-purchase satisfaction in this study) serving as mediators. Finally, the relationship between past experiences and future vehicle demand is discussed. Future vehicle choices are classified into four groups that based on fuel type, body size, vehicle addition or replacement, and desire for new or used automobiles. The results indicate that consumers who have experienced sustainable vehicles are more likely to continue to select them in the future. In terms of the impact factors of ZEV satisfaction and recommendation, PHEV owners are concerned about the costs associated with gasoline and electricity consumption at home. BEV users consider not just all of the aforementioned but also battery range and the availability of public charging stations. FCEV users value the convenience of refueling their vehicles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 101535"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885925000186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the worldwide impacts of climate change, it is crucial to embrace sustainable transport alternatives in order to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases. This study seeks to probe the impact factors of future vehicle choices and recommendations to other potential users. Specifically, clustering is first done based on vehicle attributes to group users' future vehicle intentions. Then a weighted multinomial logistic model (MNL) is developed to study the impact factors of people's future vehicle demand. Following that, three distinct models are evaluated to identify factors influencing consumer willingness to recommend three different zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) listed by the California Air Resources Board, namely plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), battery electric vehicles (BEVs), and hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), with past experiences (reflected by post-purchase satisfaction in this study) serving as mediators. Finally, the relationship between past experiences and future vehicle demand is discussed. Future vehicle choices are classified into four groups that based on fuel type, body size, vehicle addition or replacement, and desire for new or used automobiles. The results indicate that consumers who have experienced sustainable vehicles are more likely to continue to select them in the future. In terms of the impact factors of ZEV satisfaction and recommendation, PHEV owners are concerned about the costs associated with gasoline and electricity consumption at home. BEV users consider not just all of the aforementioned but also battery range and the availability of public charging stations. FCEV users value the convenience of refueling their vehicles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
期刊最新文献
Impact of autonomous vehicles on long-distance travel mode and destination choices in Texas Are past ownership experience and satisfaction major determinants of endorsement and future demand for zero emission vehicle technology when accounting for vehicle characteristics? What can empirical utility functions tell us about the value of a statistical life? Transmission of oil price risk to airline stock returns: Evidence from China and the United States Effects of building cycling infrastructure on bicycle use: Differences by gender through a longitudinal natural experiment study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1